It’s British New Wave (clearly Richardson from Look Back in Anger, Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner) taking on some of the style of the French New Wave- mainly Truffaut
One of the best edited films of the 1960’s- the editing is a character
Academy Award wins for picture, writer, director and score
First of 5 noms for Finney
Finney was one of the go-to first faces on the acting side of the British New Wave- Saturday Night and Sunday Morning– 1960—he’s also a small role in Richardson’s The Entertainer
It updates Henry Fielding’s for the modern generation—not quite like Sofia Coppola did with Marie Antoinette or Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet but in a similar vein
Opens with titles and dialogue-less like a silent film then the omniscient voice-over with a sense of humor winking at the audience saying things like “we’ll leave such scenes (sex scene) for decency and decorum”
Film debut for David Warner
Prestige period picture/adaptation-but we have comic organ cues for laughing, reflexivity talking to the camera
Great comic actors like Peter Bull and Hugh Griffith
Keystone cops-like broad comedy—fast-motion in one sequence,
Wipe editing, freeze frame, it’s wild—the narrative movies and the transitions are genius—Iris in later, very- Truffaut Shoot the Piano Player
It’s editing is far superior to any of the five films nominated in that category in 1963
Richardson directs the hell out this thing
Hugh Griffith was apparently a handful on set- always drunk—I can only say that his performance is excellent- it matches the style of the editing and pace with perfection
Finney is superb- a bounder—adventurer and folk hero—grinning in most shots
The freeze frame of Susanna York looking at the camera—long silent sequence after
The eating chicken foreplay scene is great
Lines like “civilization my trunk” by Griffith at a costume part wearing an elephant costume
Freeze-frame jump cutting as two eavesdrop on a door
Freeze frame final shot—years before Butch Cassidy (1969), though four years after The 400 Blows
You know, it’s funny (Finney?). This is probably the single most despised Best Picture winner that I know of outside of not-quite-Cronenberg in 2005. This gets a 2.8 out of 5 on Letterboxd and nearly all of the highest-rated reviews are 1-star reviews and virtually everybody seems to revile the editing (“sloppy”), acting, writing (the characterization especially), and shooting (“ugly”) of the film. Why do you think that is given that clearly you don’t feel any of that about the film at all?
@Zane- Hmm- I do not use Letterboxd– but on Rotten Tomatoes the reviews are fine. Certainly not spectacular but better than plenty of Best Picture Winners (83% positive)- including Forrest Gump and others. https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/guide/oscars-best-and-worst-best-pictures/ . It didn’t win best picture but I think The Tree of Life is 83% positive.
You know, it’s funny (Finney?). This is probably the single most despised Best Picture winner that I know of outside of not-quite-Cronenberg in 2005. This gets a 2.8 out of 5 on Letterboxd and nearly all of the highest-rated reviews are 1-star reviews and virtually everybody seems to revile the editing (“sloppy”), acting, writing (the characterization especially), and shooting (“ugly”) of the film. Why do you think that is given that clearly you don’t feel any of that about the film at all?
@Zane- Hmm- I do not use Letterboxd– but on Rotten Tomatoes the reviews are fine. Certainly not spectacular but better than plenty of Best Picture Winners (83% positive)- including Forrest Gump and others. https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/guide/oscars-best-and-worst-best-pictures/ . It didn’t win best picture but I think The Tree of Life is 83% positive.