Fincher. David Fincher has now spent 25 years as a top filmmaker. His includes nine (9) archiveable films, three (3) in the top 500 (Fight Club, Zodiac, Seven), and another two (Social Network, Gone Girl) that should enter when the top 500 when the 10 year moratorium lifts. Fincher makes films that are not only consistently brilliant but brilliantly consistent. When searching for images for this post it’s interesting- unlike most auteurs you’re not looking for a highlight shot or image from their work—you’re looking for the typical Fincher look/lighting/mise-en-scene. That’s an unbelievable compliment.
Best film: Fight Club. Fortunately, after being severely underrated for a decade or so, this is slowly being correctly canonized as one of the best films of the 1990’s.
total archiveable films: 9
top 100 films: 0
top 500 films: 3 (Fight Club, Zodiac, Seven)
top 100 films of the decade: 5 (Fight Club, Zodiac, Seven, The Social Network, Gone Girl)
most overrated: Nothing. Don’t come to be looking for overrated Fincher films.
most underrated: Gone Girl. . Metacritic almost always underrates Fincher (The Social Network aside)- the first film of his to score over 70 was zodiac in 2007. I have little doubt it’ll change soon but right now Gone Girl is #14 on TSPDT for 2014 (it was #22 in 2015) and that’s outrageously underrated. It might be the best written film of 2014, is sumptuously shot, and might be the best edited film of the year as well.
gem I want to spotlight: The Social Network. It is a marvel and much more than just a hair-on-fire genius screenplay by Sorkin. Even if repeat viewings lessen the sting of Sorkin’s dialogue (which I highly doubt they will) your appreciation for Fincher’s work, lighting, rowing montage, will expand. It’s a masterpiece that may combine the best work of both David Fincher and Aaron Sorkin. Hard to top Travers: “The Social Network lights up a dim movie sky with flares of startling brilliance. Director David Fincher (Fight Club, Seven, Zodiac) puts his visual mastery to work on the verbal pyrotechnics in the dynamite, dick-swinging script by Aaron Sorkin (The West Wing), and they both do the best and ballsiest work of their careers. The Social Network gets you drunk on movies again. It deserves to go viral.”. From the opening you know you’re watching something special. Fincher paints the mise-en-scene so well with his patented darkness (he may have to take the mantle of the master of darkness from Gordon Willis), green/yellow lighting—the dialogue is fire—there are tiny flaws “I could do without the Stairmaster line” going as broad as that— apparently the opening dialogue scene was shot in 99 takes—a Fincher trademark—such a perfectionist. It’s the 21st century Citizen Kane– told in a creative flashback narrative, genius/billionaire of our times, layered, dark. The case for it being Fincher’s best (it’s this or Fight Club I believe) is that it’s as procedurally formal as Zodiac (hmm), as “of our times” as Fight Club, and has an ending as devastating as Seven. Shakespearian weight to these characters, the setting—the morality play 2.5 scenes (including that jaw-dropping opening) with Rooney Mara and it’s a star-maker… Eisenberg was already established but this is his best, Garfield is mesmerizing, Armie Hammer became a star, too. Trent Rezner’s score is masterful- it’s the theme is only used a few times but it’s one of the best scores of the decade. A medication on jealousy. The case against it being Fincher’s best is that you’re just in the throes of the narrative machine at work for 10-15 minute stretches a few times without really admiring (too much) what’s in front of you visually—this is getting really nit-picky though and only worthwhile when making the distinction between like this and In the Mood for Love or Tree of Life on the masterpiece level. Garfield gives us the big final scene though I think I’m going with Eisenberg who has the slightly better achievement- neither are the wrong answer— Garfield’s little dance over to him at the Jewish party and then saying “I’m buying” with those eyes—it’s a remarkably sympathetic character—and then he tears your heart out at the ambush at the end. One of the best 10 screenplays in the artform’s history- Chinatown, Casablanca, The Godfather, Pulp Fiction, Sunset Boulevard, Seventh Seal—a few others. Lines could go on forever “You would’ve invented Facebook” I’m 6’5 220 lbs and there are two of me”—the entire “do I have your full attention” scene—“I was your only friend”. Fincher is a ridiculously good editor- one of the best we have and the Regatta scene, paired with music and stunning photography is just him showing that skill off without Sorkin at all—but his largest overall achievement in the film is the mise-en-scene specifically the lighting. It’s just very rare in cinema’s history that an auteur/director make his movies so specifically unique to look at in every frame and so beautiful. It’s unmistakably a Fincher film from the lighting. Timberlake is revelation and the film is off again- he’s intoxicatingly good. It’s not him though, and as much as I like the cast it’s not the cast—it’s Fincher—he made Ben Affleck amazing in Gone Girl–The dialogue makes for a chess match and a tennis match simultaneously. Sorkin is taking us in and out of a series of conversations, testimonies in the larger structure—and then within the scenes the verbal wit is without a peer. Another show-off editing for Fincher is Timberlake’s dinner montage. “The ambush”- lighting as mise-en-scene as Fincher shoots Garfield low- it’s Welles. I might change the ending with the Beatles song—“baby you’re a rich man”—the Beatles are notoriously hard to get and it’s a coup—but I’d go back to Rezner’s notes like the opening and the ambush—the ambush scene is one of the best of the decades because of the lighting, Garfield, Sorkin and Rezner. A masterpiece.
stylistic innovations/traits:
Lighting, lighting, lighting- Fincher is a master of mise-en-scene and the creative god-child of German expressionism. Look at the list of directors above and below on this list—there have been great auteurs before Fincher and there will be great auteurs after but nobody’s films look like his. He’s is the current master of darkness (unofficial mantle I took from dp Gordon Willis) and his films are both gorgeous and easily identifiable- there is no mistaking a Fincher film when flipping around your tv at home. Try watching a film of his (for a second) with the lights on in your house- it’s impossible with the glare. His narratives are almost all a mirror image of that darkness- like a dystopian gloom whether he’s ruminating on masculinity (Fight Club, Gone Girl) or malevolent incarnate (Seven, Zodiac). Detractors say that his films are no more than experiments in style but those same people probably would say the same about Wes and QT. I guess Fincher doesn’t write his own work (many of the great auteurs don’t- Scorsese, Hitchcock) in his world like Wes and QT but Fincher has also reigned over some of the best narratives in the last decade so he either has had some input or has a remarkable ear for good narrative.
top 10
- Fight Club
- The Social Network
- Zodiac
- Seven
- Gone Girl
- The Curios Case of Benjamin Button
- The Game
- The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
- Panic Room
By year and grades
| 1995- Seven | MS/MP |
| 1997- The Game | R |
| 1999- Fight Club | MP |
| 2002- Panic Room | R |
| 2007- Zodiac | MP |
| 2008- The Curious Case of Benjamin Button | R |
| 2010- The Social Network | MP |
| 2011- The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo | R |
| 2014- Gone Girl | MS |
*MP is Masterpiece- top 1-3 quality of the year film
MS is Must-see- top 5-6 quality of the year film
HR is Highly Recommend- top 10 quality of the year film
R is Recommend- outside the top 10 of the year quality film but still in the archives
@Drake – What are your most up to date grades for Fincher’s films?
@James Trapp – Hi James- unvetted- but here’s what I have on his page on my sheets- may be one or two that I haven’t updated yet:
1995- Se7en MP
1997- The Game R
1999- Fight Club MP
2002- Panic Room HR
2007- Zodiac MP
2008- The Curious Case of Benjamin Button HR/MS
2010- The Social Network MP
2011- The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo R
2014- Gone Girl MS/MP
2020- Mank MS
2023- The Killer HR
@Drake – awesome, thanks, I really like seeing Gone Girl inching toward MP, I picked it for a movie club I do with my family and am looking to revisit Benjamin Button this week
I am really excited about the next Fincher film, finally another collaboration with Brad Pitt, and from a Tarantino script. Hopefully it comes to fruition. The only downside for me is that it will be on Netflix, and not in the theaters.
My ranking of Fincher`s films that I`ve seen:
1. The Social Network MP
2. Zodiac MP
3. Fight Club MP
4. Se7en MP
5. Gone Girl MS
6. Mindhunter MS (probably)
7. Mank MS
8. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button HR/MS
9. The Killer HR/MS
10. Panic Room HR
11. The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo R
12. The Game R
20 Best Performances
1. Eisenberg- The Social Network 5
2. Pike- Gone Girl 5
3. Freeman- Se7en 5
4. Britton- Mindhunter 5
5. Norton- Fight Club 5
6. Pitt- Fight Club 5
7. Oldman- Mank 5
8. Garfield- The Social Network 5
9. Spacey- Se7en 5
10. Mara- The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo 5
11. Carter- Fight Club 5
12. Ruffalo- Zodiac 5
13. Downey Jr.- Zodiac 5
14. Fassbender- The Killer 5
15. Hammer- The Social Network 5
16. Lynch- Zodiac 4.5
17. Groff- Mindhunter 4.5
18. McCallany- Mindhunter 4.5
19. Pitt- Se7en 4.5
20. Timberlake- The Social Network 4.5
@RujK – Mindhunter not renewing for a 3rd season was infuriating. I normally would applaud a top auteur leaving a TV Series to make a film and Mank (2020) was fantastic but why create something as brilliant as Mindhunter only to abandon it after 2 seasons. Apparently there is a small chance for a 3rd season but it seems to be very unlikely at this point. I like you including Groff, Holden Ford is a fascinating character
@James Trapp- I had a similar reaction to the cancellation as yourself. A real crime. I have actually bought the book that was the inspiration- plan to read it when I will rewatch the show for my tv show study.
@RujK – Great list, I have a few minor differences but pretty much agree with this
I would include Gyllenhaal in Zodiac. I am bigger on Gyllenhaal than most admittingly but he is tremendous in Zodiac even though I would agree Ruffalo and Downey Jr. are more impressive on a per minute basis and probably make more of an impact on the viewer. Gyllenhaal plays up the earnest boy scout persona from October Sky (1999) in a far better film
I like Lynch included despite the minor amount of screen time. He is so incredibly creepy and manages to function as the key Villain with just a few scenes
@James Trapp- I also like Gyllenhaal (especially that boy scout enthusiasm), don’t really understand those that actually do not like the performance, I am just never really blown away by the ambition of his characterization (always when I grade performances I look at how perfectly they realize the character and how ambitiously they do it)- other 3 performers have much more difficult tasks and far more “perfect” at that- and I realize how subjective that is, though I try. 4 or 4.5 out of 5.
Lynch for example has to realize the entire chilling enigma of a man, all the nuances of his guilt or innocence that haunts the entire film from a single scene and one masterful reaction shot; Ruffalo is incredible because he so perfectly presents this unquestionable cop, who slowly, terrifyingly and heartbreakingly becomes haunted by this unsolvable case; Downey does a similar thing with a sardonic, charismatic reporter whose desperation leads to self-destruction in a much more poignant way than Gyllenhaal. The height of Gyllenhaal’s ambitions is the slow turn into an unhealthy obsession, but I have seen that done to a much greater effect in a lot of other works, even by Gyllenhaal himself in Enemy.
I hope you understand what I’m getting at.
@RujK – I do, I think those are all fair points. I enjoy that you rank the performances. I do not do it myself as I find it quite difficult. When it comes to lists in general, I think consistency is crucial so I I appreciate you have a method even if as you note it is still subjective to a degree. I actually missed that you have Cameron Britton from Mindhunter and I love that pick as well as it is consistent with “realizing the character”.
I actually got the Mindhunter book as a gift a couple of years ago for a Secret Santa I do with my family. It is an excellent read. Fincher is the perfect auteur for anything related to “True Crime”. When I rewatched Red Dragon (2002) a few weeks back I kept thinking how much better that film would have been with Fincher directing
I am actually about to watch Seven (1995). Been on a true crime
* I am actually about to watch Seven (1995) again. Been on a true crime binge lately
I am curious, do you rank directors? I have thought about doing that soon for directors I have covered via Director Studies
@James Trapp- great, in the discord server I actually explain the grades a bit more thoroughly. I also settled on a 4.5 for Gyllenhaal as I really do not have any real complaints.
Excited for Mindhunter, I might actually start the TV study with more auteur-ish shows just so that the transition won’t be to jarring, so a rewatch is probably pretty close.
I do rank directors for the decade analyses, but nothing bigger. Maybe later in the future.
@RujK – Yeah when it comes to TV it seems less driven by one person compared to auteur cinema. Even with a show like Breaking Bad, created by Vince Gilligan, there are many directors. 25 directors in a show with 60 episodes
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0903747/fullcredits/director
For Mindhunter Season 1 David Fincher director the 1st and 10th episode
Study Summary:
David Fincher has been a favorite of mine ever since my first viewing of Fight Club
I do not distinguish my list of objectively best films from personal favorites to the same degree that I once did, but I will still recognize they are not entirely the same thing. Zodiac is my favorite film of the 21st Century and one of my top 5 or 6 films favorite films of all time, it also happens to be one of the very best somewhere in the top 30 for me
Fincher’s filmography is very strong with 5 MP and 2 MS.
Of the 5 MP, I am confident with Zodiac at # 1. The Social Network at # 2 and Fight Club at # 3 are really close and I think there is a bit of a gap between those two and Gone Girl and Seven, which are also MPs
I would not rule out bumping up either of those MS as both Mank and The Killer were very impressive films although for now I am good with those grades. I do think The Killer (2023) is stronger although Mank as a couple of truly stunning images but is not quite as consistently impressive shot to shot and not as formally impressive as The Killer
With Fincher there is an incredible visual consistency from not only film to film but within a film shot to shot. A Fincher film is often identifiable almost instantly. The lighting serves a purpose beyond aesthetics, it serves as a strong visual match for the dark subject matter of his work. His films cover subjects such as serial killers, hitmen, criminal investigations, characters undergoing psychological changes, loners on the outskirts of society, and even the nature of truth as some of his films have unreliable narrators
Several of Fincher’s films revolve around an investigation/mystery of sorts: both Seven and Zodiac has its protagonists chasing a serial killer; The Social Network uses a flashback structure with the present timeline set in an office regarding a disposition; The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo involves a 40 year old disappearance; and Gone Girl involves a disappearance with true crime elements
The use of shallow focus is effective with its troubled protagonists who feel isolated even when they are in close proximity to groups of people. His protagonists are often isolated individuals who often have psychological problems. Even Zuckerberg, the man with a billion “Facebook Friends” was basically friendless. Ed Norton’s unnamed narrator in Fight Club is even more disturbed than he initially appears to be. Ironically Fassbender’s assassin in The Killer (2023) is one of the most self-assured protagonists because despite being an assassin he seems comfortable with who he is although he does break his own rule of “forbid empathy” in one key scene
The scores are crucial with Fincher as they, along with the lighting, reinforcing the dark atmosphere and subject matter of his films
Despite the dark subject matter, several of Fincher’s films have mainstream appeal, most notably The Social Network and Gone Girl. Fight Club has gained popularity over the years but that is due more to its status as a Cult Film
Like other top level auteurs, he has great actors and actresses. And beyond that he is so good with his casting. In the Gone Girl review, I went into detail regarding why Ben Affleck was such a genius casting choice. Eisenberg as Zuckerberg is another of the standout choices, he gives one of the very best performance of the decade as I went into detail for The Social Network review. There are many others including Brad Pitt in Fight Club, Spacey in Seven, Rosamund Pike in Gone Girl, Jodie Foster in Panic Room, Timberlake in The Social Network, Downey Jr in Zodiac, Fassbender in The Killer, amongst many others
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button has strong visuals even if overall it feels like a fish out of water for Fincher. The Game is easily his weakest for me, there are some ideas I like, and it is quite fun at times but overall, just much weaker and ambitious than the rest of his work
Final Ranking and Grades:
MP
# 1 Zodiac
# 2 The Social Network
# 3 Fight Club
# 4 Gone Girl
# 5 Seven
MS
# 6 The Killer
# 7 Mank
HR
# 8 Panic Room
HR/R
# 9 The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
R/HR
# 10 The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
R
# 11 The Game
@James-“The Game is easily his weakest”
He did direct Alien 3
@Malith – I skipped it, it is the only feature film of his I have not seen
@James – you should check out the short animated film ‘Bad Travelling’ which is on Netflix and directed by Fincher, I think it’s really cool. It was part of an anthology series on Netflix called Love Death + Robots and is a good quick watch.
The Killer (2023)
Notes:
For the purpose of this review whenever I write “The Killer” I am referring to the film’s main character played by Michael Fassbender since his actual name is never revealed
Does anyone do the opening credits better than Fincher? This is a throwback to Seven (1995) especially with the disturbing images and stylized graphics
Chapter 1 Paris / The Target
Michael Fassbender as the title character narrates from the inside of an apartment unit
3:43 elevated POV shot through open window at top of apartment building, showing The Killer’s tactical advantage over his mark
6:15 overhead shot of narrow staircase as The Killer briefly leaves the room
9:10 beige hat resembles fedora and beige jacket blends in with interior of apartment
13:00 some great dark humor as The Killer ponders about the ways he kills “When was my last, nice, quiet drowning?”
14:40 green/yellow glare and dissolve
17:04 high angle shots reinforce his tactical advantage
19:16 Killer’s face and sniper riffle taking up entire frame
21:24 the first time a shot is fired after all that build up
23:27 high angle shot of aftermath with police and security arriving at scene
25 min The Killer forensic countermeasures
29:39 carefully placed objects within hotel room showing ultra cautious nature
Chapter 2: Dominican Republic/The Hideout
31:23 overhead shot as The Killer driving through long road near in tropical area
33:56 dark clouds as foreshadow
35 min The Killer’s girlfriend injured in hospital, humanizing the protagonist who thus far is shown as a loner who shows little to no emotion
40:11 The Killer as silhouette image standing in alley
43:01 over shoulder shot
43:10 internal narration with The Killer repeating professional mantras
Chapter 3 The Lawyer
52:24 camera focused on The Killer’s face as he calmly
53:49 venetian blinds in dimly lit office
54:30 Hodges is unfazed by The Killer showing up point a gun around
56:44 power dynamics with close low and high angle shots between The Killer and Hodges
58:13 mantra repeated
1:03:03 The Killer kidnaps the Lawyers Assistant and successfully gets vital financial information
1:05:37 dark shadow covers The Killers face so he is merely outline during night
1:06:33 pink/blue skyline as The Killer washes the white van he’s been driving
Chapter 4: Florida/The Brute
1:07:34 overhead shot
1:10:00 neon lit signs outside strip club
1:12:48 silhouette image of The Killer with yellow/green fog surrounding him
Chapter 5: New York/The Expert
1:21:26 Grand Central
1:23:21 over the shoulder shot and car window as frame with deep focus
1:25:10 Tilda Swinton as “The Expert” a fellow assassin
1:25:55 silhouette close up profile shot with shallow focus and blurry red light
1:27:00 The Killer enters dimly lit restaurant, The Waterfront,
1:28:04 “you would be very impolite to refuse to join in my last supper” Swinton’s character is awesome
1:33:08 The Killer remains unblinking throughout
1:33:52 The Killer repeats mantra before murder
Chapter 6: Chicago/The Client
1:41:21 splitting of frame inside locker room with Client on right and The Killer on the left
1:46:12 face to face between The Client and The Killer in the Clients expensive downtown apartment
1:49:23 subverts expectations and does not kill The Client, instead merely threatens
Epilogue
1:50:50 The Killer returns to his girlfriend’s place and film ends
Thoughts:
This is an impressive film start to finish but the opening 21 minutes is unbelievable. It is set primarily in a small dimly lit apartment unit, features no spoken dialogue aside from internal narration from Michael Fassbender’s character who is referred to as The Killer. There is minimal action, little in the way of story/plot, and no interactions between characters…and yet it is absolutely riveting building up suspense while Fassbender wows you with an incredibly focused yet dryly amusing performance
This film is well directed but the performance from Fassbender is impeccable (the best of 2023 in my opinion aside from Civilian Murphy in Oppenheimer). Fassbender excels in these roles as evident from his collaborations with Steve McQueen, especially Shame (2011), in which he plays
The film certainly has narrative and stylistic similarities to Melville’s Le Samouraï (1967). Both of the leads, Alain Delon and Michael Fassbender play taciturn characters, however, Fassbender’s character has the internal narration giving access to his steam of conscious thoughts consisting of a combination of philosophical musings, facts, statistics, and even pop culture references amongst other thought ideas that cross his mind
Amusingly filled with pop culture references, Popeye the sailor, The Green River Killer Gary Ridgeway, McDonalds, John Wilkes Booth, Storage Wars TV Show, etc. The Killer uses the names of Sitcom characters as his various aliases, he seems to get a kick out of it
I love how meticulous this film is, the sequence following the failed Paris hit in the film’s opening Chapter shows The Killer immediately departing from the scene and using prearranged locations to change clothes and performing various forensic countermeasures in protecting himself being stopped or arrested by police
The film is impressive formally using the 6 Chapter Structure, repetition with the repeated mantras in each chapter in which The Killer reminds himself via internal narration to “forbid empathy” and “stick to the plan, don’t improvise” amongst other thoughts. The Killer is shown on planes at the end of each chapter on his way to his next job along with a joke about the various sitcom names he uses each time
The final chapter subverts expectations but the most exciting for me aside from the opening was Chapter 5 “The Expert” which features the great Tilda Swinton who does most of the talking in a great sequence at an upscale restaurant
Roger Ebert once hilariously wrote that there are more Hollywood films about hitmen than the actual population of real life hitmen.
This is a meticulously designed film
I am not there yet but this has MP potential
Verdict: MS
Mank (2020)
Notes:
Starts in black and white, a noticeable change for Fincher
2.21 to 1 aspect ratio
Gary Oldman plays real life film screenwriter, Herman J. Mankiewicz, a brilliant writer with a penchant for boozing
5:20 close up profile shot of Orson Welles
6:07 beautiful b&w photography in low angle shot of Orson Welles
9:25 shallow focus shot with Mank on bed in foreground and blurry image approaching from back of frame, image revealed to be Orson Welles
12:27 slow pan up in shot of a Hollywood studio
13:52 the light seeps through venetian blinds into office
20:38 great use of framing via a U shaped tree
22:26 great composition with low angle shot of Mank looking up at Marion Davies played by Amanda Seyfried and sky in background of frame
24:40 impressive composition of set during a movie being shot while Mank meets William Randolph Hearst, the man who is partially the inspiration for the protagonist of Citizen Kane
29:06 camera pans to bottles of booze after calls to an unresponsive Mank
31:24 I love the cinnamon role analogy in reference to the narrative structure of Citizen Kane
34:53 reverse tracking shot as Mank brings brother into Hollywood Studio
36:39 spectacular shot with slightly titled high angle shot with the co-found of MGM studio, Louis B. Mayer (played by Arliss Howard) as his character is shown in deep focus speaking to employees, the lighting resembles a shot from Citizen Kane
36:55 low angle shot over shoulder of Mayer facing crowd of employees
41:26 interiors of William Randolph Hearst’s considerable mansion filled with Hollywood players including Marion Davies and other gorgeous actresses
46:52 Mank is the best party guest entertaining the room
54:28 similar shot to the one at 9:25 only here the person is the Lily Collins character not Orson Welles
54:48 sunlight seeping through the windows
1:06:00 excellent use of Venetian Blinds in scene with Mank refusing to declare political support for a particular candidate he does not agree with as Mank shows support to Upton Sinclair, a writer and political activist with ties to socialism
1:12:52 standout image with use of venetian blinds
1:24:07 high contrast lighting as Mank and his wife make their way into the nightclub on the eve of the 1934 election in California
1:27:23 montage with high ASL and sound cutting in and out as Mank becomes progressively more drunk, suspense building here as drunk Mank is ticking time bomb especially talking politics
1:31:33 binocular as frame as Mank’s brother Joseph approaches
1:40:28 sunlight through tree is Malick-like as Mank sits next to Marion
1:41:03 deep focus shot through car window as frame
1:43:20 standout image of light seeping into Church is a shot out of Citizen Kane itself
1:47:20 high slightly canted angle shot in William Randolph Hearst’s mansion, a drunk Mank enters the dinner party, the atmosphere is tense and a Mank is a ticking time bomb
1:53:00 Mank goes on extended drunken monologue insulting just about everyone in the room, with close up reaction shots on faces of party guests, in cringe sequence ending in Hearst throwing Mank out
2:00:39 spectacular use of light seeping through hall as Hearst walks a drunk Mank out of his mansion
2:02:40 extreme low angle shot of an angry Welles yelling at Mank
2:03:35 Welles tosses liquor bottles inspires Mank in writing scene where Kane starts smashing his possessions after Susan leaves him for good
2:05:00 great use of high contrast light in Academy Award scene
Thoughts:
David Fincher took a screenplay written by his father, Jack Fincher, and turned it into a film exclusively shown on Netflix. This is definitely a film with considerably less mainstream appeal than The Social Network and Gone Girl. However, similar to The Social Network and Gone Girl you have incredible wit and biting sarcasm from several characters (this is set in Hollywood after all) but no one more than Mank himself who wields this wit incorporated into his reservoir of one liners. This is a “passion project” for Fincher, and a damn good one at that
On paper the film does not sound like it would make great Cinema, yet Fincher pulls it off. The lighting is a treat, the black and white photography prevents Fincher’s trademark color palette, but it also opens up an opportunity to use light in an entirely different way which is exciting. The DP here used a digital sensor in 8K to obtain the highest resolution possible. There are numerous scenes inspired from Citizen Kane including a couple of stunners that would make Welles proud
The high contrast lighting is essential to the films visual style, most of the scenes that occur outside are during bright and sunny days including several scenes shot of movie sets, that is the movie sets within the movie. These bright outside shots are contrasted with shots of dark interiors of Hollywood studio offices. There are some great shots that use Venetian Blinds to show natural light seeping into the interiors. Aside from Hollywood studios there are some stunning shots of light seeping into a Church during funeral scene
Add Mank to the list of great films set in or about the film industry. Also add Mank to the list of beautiful black and white films from the last several years ago with Roma, Cold War, Blonde, El Conde, amongst others
The performances are solid all the way around but Gary Oldman in the lead role is the obvious standout, it is an incredible performances with Oldman disappearing into the role as he so often does. The limited appearance of Orson Welles is actually a smart move in my opinion, most of the time you hear his voice it is over the phone speaking with Mank and it’s a small percentage of the film. It gives Welles a mysterious presence
The friendship between Mank and Marion Davies is kept refreshingly platonic, it is actually quite touching; there are two particularly strong scenes between the two spread out over the film
Verdict: MS
Did you see The Killer(2023)?
@Malith – yes a few weeks ago, and I am about to watch again today with the usual notes and thoughts, and grade. Very excited, I was impressed. I was going to get to in earlier in the day but after watching Mank I could not resist revisiting Citizen Kane. Then I hope to get around to the Polanski films you send me; True Story and Officer and a Spy tomorrow.
@James-Great. I only sent subtitles for An Officer and a Spy. Hope they are working. There is once scene at the end in the film where there is no subtitles and words are displayed on screen.
They say:
“alfred dreyfus accepta la measure de grace”
“sept and plus tard, la cour de cassation le declara innocent”
“il fut reintegre dans l’armee”
Meaning:
“Alfred Dreyfus accepted the measure of pardon”
“Seven years later, the Court of Cassation declared him innocent.”
“he was reintegrated into the army”
Have you seen Tess and Knife in the Water after they got upgraded?
@Malith – thanks for the subtitle help. Regarding Tess and Knife in the Water I have not rewatched yet, I had Knife in the Water # 6 for my Polanski Study and Tess # 8. Both MS
Gone Girl (2014)
Notes:
Starts with Ben Affleck voice over unsettling score and montage of small town in Missouri the film is mainly set in. Ben Affleck as Nick Dunne and Carrie Coon as Margo Dunne, his twin and co-owner of “The Bar”
3:31 smooth transition from the bar to flashback as Amy becomes narrator as she writes in her journal
4 min Fincher signature lighting at party where Nick and Amy meet, the dialogue is key here and throughout the film, full of wit and sarcasm
6:10 sugar storm with sugar truck sequence gives fantasy like element to film along with the hypnotic score including the repetition of the xylophone
12 min the lighting again signifies a prior timeline, here a Wedding Party with Nick proposes
16 min Detective Rhonda Boney and Officer James Galpin as lead investigators on the case
25:23 Nick in exact center of frame during first press conference, in between two identical Missing Person posters with Amy’s face
29:53 Nick enters his father’s house leading to alarm
31:26 Nick enters car and drives away with his face covered in shadow, as Detective Boney and Officer Galpin watch from background of frame; this is noticeable contrast as the first signs of suspicion emerge
35 min search center for Amy filled when Nick enters
37 min attractive woman makes shameless pass at uninterested Nick
39:40 Nancy Grace inspired character Missi Pyle on TV tearing apart Nick
42:20 POV of Nick scanning outside at night
42:44 Emily Ratajkowski as Andie, a young and attractive college student, enters the film as a student in one of the college writing courses Nick teaches, reveal of affair makes Nick less sympathetic
49:29 camera slowly zooms through dark room as Andie wakes up and leaves
52 min Tyler Perry is shockingly good as high priced defense attorney Tanner Bolt, makes entrance on TV show within the film
54:50 candlelit vigil showing off Fincher’s skills
57:33 harsh lighting, Nick’s face hidden by shadow
59:40 Nick violently smashes glass following confirmation of pregnancy, kicks out detectives
1:02:49 aerial shot capturing media circus even during the night, in suburban neighborhood
1:03:13 Nick’s face again covered by shadow
1:05:45 Nick fully engulfed by shadow and taking up most of frame, great reaction shot as face comes into light before revealing the shed filled with all the credit card purchases as score ramps up the danger
1:07:00 big reveal that Amy is still alive as she recounts, with corresponding images, her framing of Nick
1:10:05 haunting image of Amy slowly sinking toward bottom of whatever body of water
1:18:55 sugar storm scene from earlier only now from Amy’s POV as she watches Nick kissing Andie outside of bar in the same manner from earlier in the film
1:20:26 Tyler Perry as Tanner Bolt meeting Nick in person
1:22:03 dimly lit bar as Nick meets Tommy O’Hara, a previous victim of Amy’s
1:29:09 a rare miscast by Fincher but I don’t like Neil Patrick Harris in this role (though I think he is hilarious in comedies)
1:30:00 slow motion shot of Nick driving by “The Bar” which now has crowds in front
1:39:38 slow zoom out from increasingly frustrated Amy becoming silhouette. This followed by daytime shot of The Gateway Arch
1:43:03 shallow focus
1:51:01 low angle shot of Desi’s beautiful lake house
1:53:18 close up shot of Nick on TV in Desi’s house followed by a transfixed Amy in foreground of shot and Desi in background; great sequence showing Nick’s plan working
2:05:00 insanely brutal murder scene, incredible editing
2:06:28 overhead shot of Amy returning covered in blood and falling into Nick’s arms
2:07:09 incompetent FBI borders on parody
2:14:42 score building to crescendo as Nick sits in dark
2:17:00 Tanner Bolt leaves town
2:22:50 emotionally brutal scene between Nick and Margo who is devastated by the knowledge that Amy is pregnant, and Nick will not leave her
Bookend with Nick’s narration from opening
Thoughts:
Fincher with a dark dissection of a marriage that is part mystery, part thriller
The film has various themes including the nature of marriage, the way the media creates narratives and prioritizes them over truth, and even the nature of truth itself. The media angle is far from a novel concept, but it does have a different sort of vibe in the 24/7 social media world. The novel the film is based on is itself heavily based on the real life case of Scott Peterson who was convicted of murdering his pregnant wife Lacey Peterson. There was a media circus for several months between the disappearance and the eventual arrest of Scott Peterson
Fincher’s lighting is key as always both for aesthetic value and also to distinguish the setting as the film moves through different timelines
Affleck’s face becomes increasingly hidden or partially covered by shadow as he becomes a suspect and faces increasing scrutiny from the Investigators
The editing in the murder sequence is amazing, it is a truly haunting scene with impeccable score building to a crescendo during brutal violence
The dialogue is so sharp here, perhaps the best of any Fincher film aside from The Social Network, the early scenes with a heavy dosing of meet cute. The sugar storm scene goes even further, it is almost fairy tale like
The score is just tremendous, in particular during the brutal murder sequence, the way it crescendo as Amy carries out a vicious attack
Affleck’s performance is effective partly because he leans into his real life persona in a way that will naturally both attract and disgust female fans, at times simultaneously. There is a scene in the film where an attractive woman shamelessly hits on him offering to make him a chicken Frito pie but lashes out when she realizes he is not interested. The first time I watched it I really had no idea whether or not he was guilty as he played the character in a way that really had you jumping back and forth.
Rosamund Pike gives an all time great performance as the villainous Amy Dunne. She is highly intelligent, manipulative, determined, vindictive, brutal, and ruthless. She is also an unreliable narrator of sorts, at least through the journal entries
I have no real complaints here, amazing screenplay, acting, direction, score, dialogue, visuals, etc.
Verdict: MP
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2011)
Notes:
Starts with awesome graphics during opening credit along with a cover of Led Zeppelin’s Immigrant Song, Fincher really has a knack for opening credits
Amazing cast complete with Daniel Craig, Robin Wright, Rooney Mara, Christopher Plummer, and best of all Stellan Skarsgård
9:09 certainly has the color palette of a Fincher film
Rooney Mara as Lisbeth Salander, a brilliant but troubled young woman who wears all black/gothic clothes and black makeup, she also has a dragon tattoo
18:38 lighting different in earlier timeline narrated by Christopher Plummer speaking to Daniel Craig about his family history and his 40 years search for Harriet
32 min detective story board the investigative work begins using flashbacks through dissolves
38 min Stellan Skarsgård makes his appearance playing Martin, the brother of the missing Harriet
45:28 soft focus with eerie score as creepy sexual advances on terrified and repulsed Lisbeth
47:50 great camera movement over Lisbeth’s head to showing upside down close up shot of her face following her sexual assault, also see the dragon tattoo on her shoulder
53:13 camera slow zoom out with score bumping before return to inside of apartment where Lisbeth is sexually assaulted again, these scenes are so brutal to watch
57:12 impressive composition with check for food in bottom of foreground and blurry surroundings as Lisbeth still traumatized moves toward shower in background
1:03:47 overhead shot immediately following taser
1:04:35 low angle shot displaying change in power dynamics as Lisbeth is now the one who has control/power over Nils Bjurman, her rapist/legal guardian. The change in power is further is further reinforced with several close ups on Lisbeth’s face in this sequence
1:17:30 Michael and Lisbeth team up almost exactly halfway through the film
1:31:28 over the shoulder POV shot of Lisbeth speeding through traffic in her motorcycle, highlighting her reckless/risk taking nature
1:35:55 nice tracking shot of Michael running after being shot at by unseen person
1:38:42 great composition of Lisbeth standing over a sitting Michael and makes a sexual advance that he resists for a whopping 4-5 seconds before giving in
1:48:50 back and forth montage of Michael and Lisbeth investigating
1:53:38 great cat and mouse movements between Martin and Michael, these are common thriller elements but done well and without score
1:56:02 nice pan to knife as tension builds and even more upon a pan to hunting riffle
1:58:16 low angle silhouette images of Martin walking behind Michael as they walk down steps into basement which reveals Martin’s torture chamber and realization that he is behind all the murders
2:01:38 Martin begins monologue
2:06:28 surveillance angle pan across floor
2:08:44 great composition with canted POV shot and Lisbeth in background of frame approaching vehicle which is set ablaze
2:17:43 Harriet is still alive, and recounts abuse to Michael in scene with three timelines; the present and two different past timelines that are all distinguishable from color palette
2:32:14 bittersweet ending as Lisbeth throws away gift for Michael upon seeing him reunited with girlfriend
Thoughts:
I skipped Aliens 3 so this is the first Fincher film I have seen that is a remake or sequel. I almost skipped this one as well but decided to watch and happy I did even if it is one of Fincher’s weaker films
The dark subject matter is right up Fincher’s alley, as is the troubled character Lisbeth
Some interesting casting choices: Daniel Craig playing Mikael Blomkvist, I know him primarily through James Bonds films though I know he has been in many other films. While the Bond background makes it harder for me to view as everyman, I still think he gives a fairly strong performance although I preferred the Michael Nyqvist portrayal. Rooney Mara as Lisbeth Salander is a huge change up from the stereotypical college student she plays in The Social Network in which she had only several minutes of screentime but was impactful. I think Noomi Rapace’s portrayal is superior though I was impressed by Mara’s performance
Overall, I think the Ficher version is superior, with more impressive compositions, lighting, editing, and score. The lighting is key not only for aesthetic purposes, but also with distinguishing scenes which occur in different timelines
Some great low angle shots, especially in a sequence displaying a change in power dynamics as Lisbeth is now the one who has control/power over Nils Bjurman, her rapist/legal guardian. The change in power is further is further reinforced with several close ups on Lisbeth’s face in this sequence
Nothing groundbreaking for Fincher here, he sticks to his strengths and gives a solid film
Verdict: R/HR
The Social Network (2010)
Notes:
Starts with a shot of Jesse Eisenberg as Mark Zuckerberg sitting across table from Rooney Mara as Erica, his brief girlfriend, in an incredibly dimly lit barroom with the Fincher green/yellow color palette. The opening scene captures your attention as Zuckerberg speaks at supersonic speed covering numerous subjects but seems slightly oblivious to his dismissiveness toward his girlfriend at the time Erica until she breaks-up with him after he insults her.
5:22 opening credits following a riveting opening scene
9:50 tempo increase as parallel editing between Zuckerberg with his friends is crossed with a party at one of the exclusive clubs Mark cannot get into
13 min window as frame capturing Zuckerberg, Eduardo and their 2 buddies inside dorm room, zoom out of window to Harvard Frat Parties
14:16 montage of Zuckerberg’s immature game comparing girls from the campus which connects entire school regardless of social status
19:28 shallow focus with camera over Zuckerberg shoulders in foreground
30:58 narrator switches mid-sentence from lawyer to Winklevoss business partner as
31:20 extreme low angle shot of Eduardo
35:20 Eisenberg is really good at this, when he gets an idea in his head you can see the gears turning in his mind, again the physical mannerisms are so good
39:24 tracking shot into Winklevoss workout room
44:40 camera with constant movement
47:17 “it’s never finished its like fashion” so many great quotes
49:36 Zuckerberg in foreground with shallow focus and blurred face of the deposition lawyer in background as Zuckerberg is completely dismissive of his questions pointing out that it is raining, this scene is one of the best examples of Zuckerberg’s arrogance although it’s kind of awesome to watch
51:42 Eisenberg and Garfield in foreground on right side of frame with shallow focus on everyone else in the room, this when they are gaining popularity and attention of girls
52:12 impressive mise en scene with placement of yellow candles throughout bar/restaurant
57 min Justin Timberlake as Sean Parker makes his entrance
1:07:01 after dramatic entrance Sean Parker gets to meeting, dialogue cuts out and brief slow motion montage eating an drinking while Parker makes a strong impression of Zuckerberg
1:17:11 drunken try outs for Facebook
1:18:44 noticeable lighting change for first scene with Zuckerberg in California
1:21:10 switch to club sequence, neon lights and music
1:24:38 overhead shot to close up on faces of Winklevoss twins racing crew
1:47:20 tracking shot through 1 million member party, lighting near identical to opening bar scene
1:50:42 shallow focus in back and forth phone conversation between Zuckerberg and Parker
1:54:28 ends with Beatles song Baby you’re a Rich Man
Thoughts:
I watched this in theatres and had to actually be talked into it by a friend as a film about Facebook did not have a lot of appeal for me, I still had a lot to learn about Cinema at the time and put too much emphasis on the subject matter despite my love of Fight Club and Zodiac
The Social Network is basically flawless, it is excellent on every level especially the direction, screenplay, acting, score, and pacing. Timberlake as Sean Parker is introduced almost exactly halfway
There are so many great subtle moments you start to notice with repeat viewings, at 43:45 Zuckerberg states he approached Eduardo for the startup money rather than the Winkle twins because Eduardo was his best friend, there is a quick pan to an empty seat from Zuckerberg’s POV
The screenplay is one of the very best using a flashback structure and a told through multiple perspectives, although primarily Zuckerberg himself. It is as lean as possible, every scene serves a purpose
The opening scene captures your attention as Zuckerberg speaks at supersonic speed covering numerous subjects but seems slightly oblivious to his dismissiveness toward his girlfriend at the time Erica until she breaks-up with him after he insults her. This opening is effective in establishing Zuckerberg’s personality including his disposition, intelligence, and social awkwardness, amongst other traits
The camera is very active, this is a high energy film and a notable contrast from Fincher’s previous film, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button which used much less camera movement and was a much slower paced film. I love the camera movement and editing in the sequence early in the film with Zuckerberg and his buddies creating immature games is shown in parallel with the parties thrown by the most exclusive clubs at Harvard
There is a notable contrast between outside scenes which use natural light and inside sequences which use artificial light. Inside scenes include offices, court rooms (for disposition), dorm rooms, etc.
Shallow focus is used in several sequences where Mark Zuckerman is surrounded by people showing his nature as an introvert even though he is perfectly comfortable speaking to people he does not know, I do not really consider him to be socially awkward, at least based on this portrayal of him though I noticed a number of reviews described him that way
Jesse Eisenberg is an actor I have always been impressed with going back to The Squid and the Whale (2005) and he nails this, one of the very best performances of the decade for me. I mean he becomes Zuckerberg, he has with the tics, mannerisms, speech patterns. Physically he’s a close match, they are both listed at 5’7’’ and probably are not more than a few pounds different in weight. But it’s far more than just verisimilitude, Eisenberg plays Zuckerberg as a complex character. He is arrogant, dismissive of others, and cold at times but all this is partially neutralized by his insecure nature. He has biting sarcasm that is often rude but quite hilarious at times.
Andrew Garfield is phenomenal as Eduardo Saverin, Zuckerberg’s best and apparently only friend at least at that time in his life. Justin Timberlake is terrific, apparently Sean Parker was impressed by the performance but said it was not remotely accurate in capturing Parker’s true self but said that he cannot really complain about being played by a sex symbol, hilarious. Timberlake has a bit of the young Tom Cruise cockiness in this role
While a films subjective matter is largely independent to its cinematic quality, The Social Network’s subject matter does give it a certain “movie of its generation” label
Verdict: MP
“This opening is effective in establishing Zuckerberg’s personality including his disposition, intelligence, and social awkwardness, amongst other traits”
“I do not really consider him to be socially awkward, at least based on this portrayal of him though I noticed a number of reviews described him that way”
I contradicted myself here, stratch the end of the first sentence, I would remove the word awkwardness
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008)
Notes:
Starts with old woman on her deathbed with her daughter by her side
2:50 flashback narrated by older woman, flashback slightly more desaturated colors than present
7:50 daughter reading from diary
8:04 dissolve moves story to past in New Orleans as Brad Pitt takes over as narrator from the daughter
10:41 Fincher’s calling card with the green/yellow color palette
15:15 Benjamin Button born with deformities
18:30 pan across room showing Benjamin’s upbringing
21 min Benjamin is raised by a black mother Taraji P. Henson and is brought to black churches where he is accepted by the community
24 min Benjamin Button as a 7 year old looks like an old man but with the height of a 7 year old
32:40 after time jump Benjamin meets his Romanic interest
44:35 shipmate is shocked to learn Benjamin has never been with a woman
45:20 bar scene uses several low angle shots and medium shots showing Benjamin uncomfortable in this environment initially
53:33 thick fog with blue tint
56:33 Benjamin going off as 17 years old
58:55 beautiful shot of boat at sea with green/yellow lighting
1:00:03 slow zoom into dimly lit crowded bar
1:10:08 flashback from Tilda Swinton character, beautiful shot complete with rainbow circle present throughout scene
1:12:40 dedication to color palette in mise en scene is impressive
1:16:47 slow zoom out, gorgeous lighting of boats at sea
1:18:35 slow pan counterclockwise building tension
1:28:21 Benjamin returns and meets up with Daisy (Cate Blanchett)
1:30:55 Daisy’s red dress stands out as a contrast to color palette throughout film, red is often associated with love/sexuality
1:31:13 series of dissolves as Daisy talks nonstop, effectively showing Benjamin’s state of mind as he is clearly falling in love
1:33:08 beautiful silhouette imagery with Jazz horn playing
1:37:33 tour through the button factory
1:38:03 medium close up used as reaction shot upon Mr. Button’s reveal that Benjamin is his son; camera capturing the two men isolated in shot reverse shot
1:40:50 excellent use of door way as frame
1:43:46 great composition with a beautiful skyline shot and blocking
1:44:03 dissolve as Mr. Button passes away going into funeral service
1:44:58 wide angle capturing Benjamin’s POV entering theater where Daisy is performing as a dancer
1:52:23 nice aerial shot, have not seen one yet in this film
2:00:52 Daisy returns to New Orleons
2:03:44 series of dissolves during their extended honeymoon of sorts with Benjamin and Daisy in their physical primes
2:10:34 rare long shot with them riding a motorcycle under dark blue clouds
2:12:39 mirror splitting frame with 2 Benjamins and then reverse shot on Daisy and her reflection as they walk toward each other, it’s brilliant symbolism regarding their contrasting aging, Daisy explains this, would have been stronger to leave unsaid (show don’t tell but still brilliant scene)
2:29:09 silhouette two shot
2:32:00 emotionally brutal
Thoughts:
I did enjoy this film but will say it is a bit odd for Fincher, more akin to a Spielberg or even Zemeckis film, at least in terms of narrative and character. Hard not to think of Forrest Gump at times. I am a big fan of Pitt but was actually surprised how good he was here, it’s very different from any other performance I have seen from him and certainly way different from his two prior Fincher collaborations. The performances were solid all the way around actually. Cate Blanchett was great because well, it’s Cate Blanchett. Some solid supporting performances as well, including Taraji P. Henson as Benjamin’s mother.
The visuals are very impressive. As usual you have incredible dedication to his preferred color palettes incorporated into the mise en scene. The interiors are meticulously designed and the lighting is magnificent as usual.
While use of narrator works great in other Fincher films, I felt like the heavy use of narrator weighted the film down at times.
Around the 132 min mark there is a scene with a mirror splitting frame with 2 Benjamins and then reverse shot on Daisy and her reflection as they walk toward each other, it’s brilliant symbolism regarding their contrasting aging, Daisy explains this, would have been stronger to leave unsaid (golden rule: show don’t tell) but still brilliant scene
The film is loosely based upon a short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald, only it is set in Baltimore. I like that they changed the setting to New Orleans, this was partly due to more beneficial tax rules, but even so New Orleans has a gothic mystique to it.
The long runtime of 2 hours 40 minutes could have been trimmed down a bit. I think there was a better 2 hour 10 minute film but even when the narrative slows there are not many uncinematic stretches
Verdict: HR/R
Zodiac (2007)
Notes:
Starts with nighttime aerial shot of San Franciso on 4th of July with fireworks over the bridge, this using Fincher’s trademark green/yellow color palette
3:50 Hurdy Gurdy Man playing in background with teens in car at lover’s lane
4:55 slow motion close-up shots used as Zodiac fires shoots into car
6:20 segues from anonymous call from Zodiac to police to another aerial shot/establishing shot of San Franciso but this one in daytime
10:25 Zodiac’s letters to police begin, POV shot of letter from editor at San Francisco Chronicle
14:08 nice frame in frame of colleagues in afterwork Bar, Gyllenhaal’s Robert Graysmith looking into Bar is established as a sort of outsider despite working with the men
17:44 zoom in on letter revealing Zodiac giving himself a name
20:11 composition captures power dynamic with Zodiac shown in towering status as his ankle to waist takes up height of frame with waist up off screen, while the terrified couple’s entire bodies are less than half the height of frame on left side of frame
20 min the entire lake sequence is so brutal and hard to watch
21:39 low angle shot emphasizing Zodiac’s stature and power over tied up couple
24:05 The Most Dangerous Game reference explained, Fincher seems to like incorporating literature references into his films
25:08 overhead shot tracking cab
25:30 again with the slow motion shooting and blood splatter
36:24 the inside of the Chronicle with its bright white lights contrasts with most of other settings so far
38 min jurisdiction issues shown via telephone montage
43:16 slightly canted surveillance angle as
44:44 meticulous composition with Toschi in background overlooking Station during call from Zodiac
51:08 Robert Graysmith has a penchant for Aqua Velvas, I always like details like this, may seem frivolous but it makes characters more authentic
51:35 “we weren’t all boy scouts Robert” says Paul Avery while taking a hit of cocaine, hilarious
55:08 another aerial shot continuing pattern
57:42 Zodiac show as silouette image in foreground with intended female victim in background of frame captured within window frame
1:00:15 dissolves and superimposed images in montage of Zodiac letters to police includes images over maps, pushing the narrative timeline further
1:05:21 Paul Avery in background of shallow focus frame, this followed by shot of Avery in focus wearing a “I AM NOT PAUL AVERY” button on shirt as he seemingly wants to “blend in”
1:15:09 the 2nd reference to Bullitt (1968) the first being a scene where Graysmith realizes Toschi wears his gun like Bullitt only to learn Toschi taught Bullitt (played by Steve McQueen)
1:21:19 John Carroll Lynch as lead suspect Arthur Leigh Allen
1:22:55 close ups on each of 3 detective isolated in frame, as they are interrogating Allen who becomes increasingly suspicious
1:25:50 green and yellow dominate mise en scene
1:34:00 search Allen’s trailer
1:40:40 inflection point reached; Paul Avery left Chronicle and Toschi’s partner transfers to spend more time with his family
1:44:00 Avery shell of former self
1:48:21 a stunning image overlooking the bridge surrounded by thick layer of clouds, this following Graysmith suddenly exhilarated after getting information from Toschi; this continues a pattern of using aerial shots of the city which functions as a sort of character in the film
1:59:55 phone call when heavy breathing, close up profile shot of Graysmith’s head and panicked look on his face
2:10:00 Graysmith’s wife asks why he needs to be the one to determine the Zodiac’s identity and he cannot really give a legitimate answer, it is just pure obsession
2:14:45 incredible suspense builds in this scene as Graysmith fears the man he is talking to might actually be the Zodiac; these are more conventional thriller/horror tactics that the film has mainly (and smartly) thus far but man this is intense
2:22:28 dim lit apartment with green/yellow lighting and papers and boxes scattered throughout apartment
2:27:40 similar shot to opening of Social Network even though lighting is not as extreme, Toschi and Graysmith talk shop
The stare down scene between Graysmith and Arthur Leigh Allen is a great understated way of handling this where a lesser director would have made this overly dramatic
The final scene in the airport is a low key final scene but the lack of resolution makes perfect sense for ending the film, of course this is largely because the real life case is still considered unsolved but none the less it makes for a solid ending
Thoughts:
I don’t say this lightly, but this might be my favorite film of all time. I have about 10 films that I could call my favorite depending on the day you ask. Objectively, its not a top 10 film ever but I do consider it a top 30 film and yes, I realize I am in the minority on this
Fincher is known as one of the most obsessive filmmakers, a control freak who will shoot a single -scene 100 times if he’s not satisfied with the first 99 takes. Above all else this is a film about obsession with Gyllenhaal’s Robert Graysmith as a sort of stand in for Fincher himself. There are examples of this throughout Fincher’s work; certainly, Morgan Freeman’s character in Seven, Eisenberg as Zuckerberg in the Social Network, to his most recent film The Killer
The 3 lead performances; Gyllenhaal, Downey Jr, and Ruffalo are all fantastic, but John Caroll Lynch’s performance as the prime suspect Arthur Leigh Allen also deserves praise, he has way less screen time of course by he is so effectively creepy and menacing in the time he does have
I like how Fincher does not completely hide the face of The Zodiac; he is shown committing 3 murders that they can definitely tie him (and possibly an attempted murder with the woman on the highway to and each time a different actor is used though they have similar physiques, their faces are covered by shadows each time but are not completely obscured. I like this choice from Fincher as it is almost more frustrated to almost be able to see him but not all the way, in a way resembles the efforts from Investigators to catch him
Most of the murders occur within the first 45 min and they are brutal showing the victims in close up shots and with the Lake murder and attempted murder there are extreme close ups on the faces of the terrified victims screaming out in pain and horror as they are being stabbed
I think this film would qualify as a two-act structure with the 2nd act starting around the 100 minute mark, this is when Graysmith’s character takes over the film as all the key players from earlier have moved on for various reasons. Graysmith is relentless in his pursuit of the truth like the star of a journalism film such as All the President’s Men
Fincher shows the impact of Zodiac on the films lead and some supporting characters but there is a community impact shown as well, Fincher uses montages and parallel editing in several scenes where multiple characters are shown reacting to a single event. The city as character trope works here, many aerial shots and overhead shots of San Franciso including a museum quality composition above the bridge
The Ciphers factor into the films plot but they also serve as a sort of motif; some of the Ciphers were solved about 40-50 years later
Some humor Gyllenhaal and Downey Jr getting hammered drinking Aqua Velvas, the scene with all the lunatics “confessing” to the Zodiac’s crimes, “have you ever considered that the zodiac is Paul Avery?” Ruffalo’s deadpan response “frequently”, Graysmith using his kids in his investigative work on Zodiac
There’s a great scene late in the film when Chloë Sevigny’s character confronts Gyllenhaal, who has become a mess, and she asks him point blank why solving the case is so important to him and why he has to be the one to do it and he is unable to answer the question. He gives some BS answer, but it is clear that even he does not truly know why he feels the need to know the Zodiac’s identity. I thought this scene was a culmination of all the events in the film leading up to it. Gyllenhaal does such a great job conveying the power of his obsession and how it has completely taken over every aspect of his life
The dedication to color palettes in the mise en scene is extremely meticulous. The screenplay is excellent, no wasted or unnecessary sequences. It just keeps moving along and a brisk pace but without any thriller/mystery cliches like jump scares or other basic audience manipulations tactics
The editing is incredible during the first murder sequence of the two teens in a lover’s lane; it involves slow motion with close ups on the faces of the terrified victims in a state of shock, the stylized nature of the sequence and the shadow looming over the shooter is haunting. The second shooting scene of the cab driver, Paul Stein also features slow a slow motion shooting
I love the use of montage in this film as it is effective in pushing narratives along their respective timelines. There are three distinct sequences of this in the film giving the time lapses a seamless transition.
I really don’t have any complaints about this film. It succeeds at every level; amazing performances, rich character details, incredible period detail with the cars and clothes, consistent color palettes, great editing using montages and some dissolve edits transitioning between scenes. It is both sprawling and efficient, every scene has a purpose, great music choices. I like the frequent god’s eye view and aerial shots; unlike other Fincher films this is not told through the perspective of one main character
Verdict: MP
If Gyllenhaal is fantastic here, I have no idea why he isn’t in the top 100 male actors of all-time.
1.Donnie Darko
2.Enemy
3.Brokeback Mountain
4.Zodiac
5.Nightcrawler
The order could be different. But that’s a rock solid top 5.
@Malith – I posted the following about Gyllenhaal on another page
“I revisited Enemy (2013) a few weeks ago and it impressed me even more, both the film and Gyllenhaal’s performance. Gyllenhaal has displayed impressive range I know filmography is the single biggest factor in your actor/actress rankings and Gyllenhaal’s is quite strong. Furthermore, he plays the lead role or co-lead in the following films and is excellent in all of them
Zodiac (2007) – clear-cut MP and Gyllenhaal is great playing the lead role. You could certainly argue for Ruffalo and/or Downey Jr having better performances but even if that’s true that is simply because of how great their performances are. Gyllenhaal has the most screen time and gives arguably the best performance with 3rd best as worst-case scenario
Enemy – (2013) – Gyllenhaal plays two characters in this excellent and really utterly fascinating doppelganger film
Brokeback Mountain (2005) – I have only seen once and it was a long time ago but from what I remember and based on reviews I read before making this post; Gyllenhaal gives a very strong performance even if Ledger is better
Donnie Darko (2001) – Gyllenhaal is excellent, this is first great performance
Nightcrawler (2014) – this is an incredible performance, and not only that but Lou Bloom is just an original character and so different from any other Gyllenhaal roles
Jarhead (2005) – I still need to see this but it is ranked highly on the 2005 page
Prisoners (2013) – Definitely the weaker of the 2013 Villeneuve films, none the less Gyllenhaal is excellent playing the lead detective with a couple of standout scenes
October Sky (1999) – A solid but not amazing film, none the less Gyllenhaal is great and gives easily the best performance though Chris Cooper and Laura Dern give solid performance as well
Zodiac – MP
Enemy – MS
Brokeback Mountain – HR/MS
Donnie Darko – HR/MS
Jarhead – HR/MS
Nightcrawler – HR
Prisoners -R
October Sky – R
He is in a number of other R level films, but I know those do not carry that much weight. Still, he has impressive range and talent along with a very strong filmography. Perhaps he has contemporaries with slightly stronger filmographies but as I noted above, he plays the lead role or co-lead in all of the best movies he is in, there are no bit parts and aside from Brokeback Mountain and possibly Zodiac he gives the films best performances.
Zodiac is the big one. I think it is hard to argue he isn’t fantastic in the others. In Brokeback he is maybe 3rd best but he has a powerful scene in front of a lake where he tells off Ledgers’ character and questions their relationship. Zodiac and maybe Jarhead as well I have heard his performance isn’t quite upto par with the quality of the film. If he is fantastic in Zodiac like you say that may change the conversation and how I feel about Gyllenhaal. He is good in Wildlife too, the one with Mulligan.
Plus Brokeback is a MS for me. I think Lee’s direction is inconsistent but the performances are amazing. And the landscapes are magnificent.
@Malith – he also has incredible range
In Zodiac and October Sky he plays very smart albeit somewhat awkward at times. In Zodiac “what are you some kind of boy scout?” “eagle scout actually”. He plays those roles with a certain charming earnestness. His character in Donnie Darko is much darker and is impressive in the way the character doesn’t fit into the usual High School film tropes.
He can also play intense characters, his character in Prisoners is ultra calm at moments with bursts of violence and intimidation when dealing with suspects. I still need to see Jarhead but he seems like an intense character and then you also have a film like Southpaw (2015) which is a medicre boxing film but still remarkable to watch his performance and physique. Especially since he made it following the below film.
His character in Nightcrawler is so chilling; his bizarre way of speaking, constantly using language from self-help mantras.
His performance in Enemy mixes his more earnest characters with the more intense ones
Panic Room (2002)
Notes:
Starts with several aerial shots of Manhattan
1:50 Jodie Foster as Meg and Kristen Stewart as her daughter Sarah
2:34 Meg is shown multimillion dollar brownstone in Manhattan as Meg is revealed to be a recent divorcee due to cheating husband
6:40 Meg is shown panic room by real estate agent, hazy blue/green lighting
8:29 camera movement to over Meg’s left shoulder
8:54 already Fincher making use of 2:40:1 aspect ratio in this composition that has Meg and Sarah on diagonally opposite corners of the frame, they are on two different floors
13:50 camera slowly gliding through house which is still mainly empty or at least unpacked
15:58 camera moving through house in similar manner to Fight Club sequence where camera follows gas through the Narrator’s apartment
16:26 camera moves through peep hole and back into residence
19:09 slow zoom on object as Forrest Whitiker’s character realizes apartment is not empty
19:49 great shot of Meg in bed as camera rotates and Forrest Whitiker in background
Jared Leto as Junior and Dwight Yoakam as Raoul; revealed the 3 are there to steal $3 million in bearer bonds except the house is supposed to be vacant, Junior has inside knowledge as the former owner is a relative while Whitaker is an expert in house securities and Raoul is a criminal and the only one who brought a facemask and a gun
26:30 Meg and intruders are both aware of the others presence and suspense ramps up
27:50 frame split with left side elevator shaft, so they pass each other
31:01 Meg and Sarah are officially in the panic room complete with video cameras everywhere
40:42 camera zooms in on wall inside panic room creating claustrophobic like atmosphere
48 min tension ramps up as the trio pumps gas into the room
49:41 propane gas is use against the trio when it creates a blue firestorm
51:58 slow zoom out as Morse Code used
57:09 Elmore Leonard reference
57:30 slow motion as Meg makes her move, sounds cuts out around
58:55 Meg
1:08:58 Raoul executes Junior
1:09:20 low angle shot
1:10:36 Stephan Altman, the cheating husband, enters apartment
1:25:53 finally see the safe
1:26:49 police show up
1:27:54 low angle shot
1:33:33 parallel editing between Whitiker drilling into safe and Meg smashing cameras with sledgehammer
1:36:24 peep hole shot
1:38:34 slow pan across hall
1:43:00 high angle shot right after Meg hits Raoul with sledgehammer
1:44:54 low angle of Burnham executing Raoul rather than running early
1:46:28 spectacular shot with Burham surrendering in backyard and bearer bonds floating away
Thoughts:
Fincher with a simple yet impressive film, less ambitious than his best work but excellent at what it is attempting with this genre exercise
Looks like a Fincher film with its lighting, atmospheric setting. The camera glides through the Brownstone several times capturing not only its vastness but its isolation from the outside world; this pays off in establishing the helplessness of the protagonists despite the security offered by the films panic room
There is some occasion comedy in the form of the personality clash of the 3 burglars; the Dwight Yoakam character, Raoul was crucial otherwise the personality clash of the Leto and Whitaker characters might have dipped too far toward comedy. Raoul reveals himself to have a significant inferiority complex that at times seems to dictate his actions far more than the money
While it was predictable even the cliché thriller sequences are so well done in terms of the filming such as the use of slow motion when Jodie Foster retrieves her cell phone. The entire final 15 minutes is extremely predictable but the tension ramps up so much it doesn’t matter. Raoul somehow surviving a sledgehammer to the head is ridiculous but it’s all good fun
The film uses frequent high angle and low angle shots in succession several times as the back and forth which is a good example of theme matching style as you have a sort of back and forth power dynamic between the trio of thieves and Meg and Sarah. There are several compositions that capture characters literally on different levels of the house
The bearer bonds into the wind reminded me of The Treasure of the Sierra Madre ending with the gold going into the wind
I loved this when I watched it as a kid but was unsure if it would hold up, when I rewatched it a couple of years ago and was pleasantly surprised to see that the answer to that question was yes. And while this is not at the same level as his top tier work, I do think it is comfortably better than The Game (1997) which certainly had its moments but is not nearly as consistently impressive
Verdict: HR/MS
Fight Club (1999)
Notes:
Starts with stylized opening credits set to The Dust Brothers
2:11 close up with Edward Norton’s character “the narrator” with a gun in his mouth held by Brad Pitt’s character iconic character “Tyler Durden”
2:48 camera moving rapidly with green/blue color palette
3:59 shallow focus surrounding The Narrator who suffers from insomnia
5:12 camera panning 360 around Narrator’s apartment with imposed images of consumer culture
6:18 Brad Pitt’s Tyler Durden appears for literally a second like a brief flash of light
11:02 blue frame with Narrator in his “cave”
12 min Marla, played by Helena Bonham Carter, joins self-help groups which bothers Narrator
12:15 best shot so far with Marla blowing out a puff from a cigarette in slow motion
14:48 nice foreground/background and shallow focus
20 min Narrator works in the insurance industry
22 min Tyler Durden appears seated next to Narrator on airplane
27:27 gas moving through Narrator’s apartment, great visuals effects
28:38 Narrator reaches out to Tyler after his apartment burns down
29:12 neon lit bar “Lou’s Tavern” with green, red, and purple
29:44 discussion on consumer culture with Tyler philosophizing about modern society’s obsession with materialism
31:03 shallow focus in bar making The Narrator and Tyler seem isolated despite being surrounded by group of people
32:24 freeze frame followed by Narrator explaining Tyler’s strange and disturbing behavior and personality
35 min the fighting begins in bar parking lot, as Narrator and Tyler start to hit each other and strangely enjoy it before returning to Tyler’s dilapidated building
38:10 pan counterclockwise
38:30 golfing at night
39:06 stacks of books/papers throughout the house, dimly lit
40:24 nice background/foreground work with Pitt talking in bathtub while smoking cigarette
40:42 fight club expanding
41:16 “Cornflower blue” Narrator’s fight club impacting his white collar job
41:48 great tracking shot as Tyler enters Lou’s bar like he owns the place, the neon lights are contrast to the drab palette so far
42:57 iconic “rules of fight club
47:33 great split of frame and foreground/background work
48:44 distorted images of Marla and Tyler having sex
49:21 blue/green palette from earlier returns when Marla takes first appearance
1:04:20 overhead shot following the acid burning
1:05:10 the narrator indirectly threatens his boss after getting confronted with the “rules of fight club” that he forgot to remove from the printer, the Narrator uses such high level detail in describing the weapons he would use
1:06:15 nice framing with extreme close ups during phone call, showing Narrator and Marla back and forth on phone in isolated shots
1:08:38 Bob from support groups in beginning of film, now returns and is revealed to be Fight Club member
1:10:40 great speech from Tyler
1:11:38 Lou of Lou’s Tavern shows up in basement of Fight Club revealing
1:12:15 Tyler responds to Lou directing them out to suggesting Lou joins the club, this entire sequence is hilarious as Tyler descends into madness scaring away Lou
1:14:52 Tyler commands room while sitting down
1:16:06 Narrator blackmails boss in hilarious way
1:17:07 great low angle shot of Narrator starting to harm himself
1:20:00 Project Mayhem begins, montage of reckless destruction
1:22:04 Tyler terrifies Store Clerk in attempt to motivate man into
1:24:45 close up on Tyler’s face with shaky camera
1:28:10 running Fight Club like a college fraternity complete with hazing
1:34:26 Tyler’s face inverted with POV shot from random guy
1:35:27 train noises muffled in background
1:36:12 amazing sequence with slow motion, blurry images, and rapid edits while noise crawls to a near halt reminding me of Raging Bull
1:38:00 shot inside of vehicle during rain, similar to scene early in Seven (1995) with Freemon and Pitt
1:42:34 Tyler gone
1:47:27 “his name his Robert Paulson”
1:49:00 the search for Tyler, but always a step behind
1:51:10 big reveal starts
1:53:00 Tyler reveals similar to The Sixth Sense which interestingly came out the same year, 1999
2:02:18 police officers actually are members of Fight Club
2:03:48 tracking shot leading to Narrator running through traffic
2:05:28 green/blue lighting
2:09:44 self-referential, opening scene
2:09:47 great shot with Tyler putting gun in Narrator’s mouth and huge glass window with blue tint
2:13:26 slow motion of smoke through Narrator’s mouth after shooting himself in the head
2:14:44 nice blocking
2:15:40 The Pixies “Where Is My Mind?” playing as buildings collapse, Narrator now revealed to be Tyler holds hands with Marla as they calmly watch the destruction around them
Thoughts:
A box office failure with mixed reviews upon its release, yet this film endured thanks to a dedicated cult fan base and is now considered one of the best films of the 1990s by many
It does not really factor into my rankings, but this has become arguably Fincher’s most iconic film with undeniable pop culture presence; “First rule of fight club is you do not talk about fight club. Second rule of fight club…”
Fincher’s trademark yellow/green lighting present throughout the film which takes place in a similar world to Seven (1995) even if the violence is not as extreme, the films atmosphere is similarly bleak and uses dulls color palettes with limited primary colors in emphasizing the Narrator’s mundane existence
Some great use of slow motion like the entrance of Carter’s character as she smokes a cigarette in a hyper stylized fashion. The visuals reinforce the themes related to the Narrator’s psychological state of mind as Fincher uses a combination of extreme close ups, low angles shots, slow motion, blurry images, etc.
There is an intentional visual contrast between the Narrator’s existence in the bland corporate world accompanied with whites and fluorescent green and his new life revolving around Fight Club and Project Mayhem which takes place in dark basements, dilapidated apartments, etc. There is also a noticeable difference in the extremely dull outfits worn by the Narrator vs Tyler’s flashy leather coats, expensive sunglasses, and bright colored robes
Shallow focus used in scenes with the Narrator and Tyler in public areas like bars or on the street showing them cut off from the outside world even when physically surrounded by people
The three leads; Brad Pitt, Edward Norton, and Helena Bonham Carter are all phenomenal. Pitt’s role is the most iconic of the film and really, he is playing the epitome of cool with his confident nature and flashy clothing
Some great dark humor like the Narrator blackmailing his boss and some quotes from Carter’s character not to mention Marla and Narrator negotiating the splitting up of the support groups
The ending with The Pixies “Where Is My Mind?” playing could not be more perfect matching of song to what is occurring on the screen
Verdict: MP
The Game (1997)
Notes:
Starts with strange home video dream
3 min Michael Douglas as Nicholas Van Orton, a wealthy but lonely man
4:18 slow zoom into Nicholas office
6:15 Sean Penn as the brother Conrad Van Orton, he joins Nicholas in restaurant and ends up purchasing him a ticket to a “game” run by a Company called CRS. It is all really mysterious, but Conrad seems to feel that Nicholas needs something new in his routine life
13:33 reoccurring dream sequence with slow motion shot of man jumping off roof
18 min blue/black/gray color palette inside office
18:35 series of dissolves used to take Nicholas through all the tests
19:50 flashing lights from projector
26:33 creepy clown discovered in Nicolas’s driveway
33:53 wide angle shot of Nicolas walking through airport, Fincher sure loves airports
38 min series of wildly unlikely connections
43:07 dimly lit parking garage with creepy music
53 min Christine (Deborah Kara Unger) leaves in a cab after a series of events with Nicolas, and reveals she was part of the Company, it is unclear if she was joking with him or not
58:35 series of rapid shots with drugs in hotel room
59:50 side mirror shot as Nicolas is followed
1:06:24 intense royal blue color heavily saturated when Nicolas returns to his house, this is the same color saturation from a scene in Seven when Sommerset and Mills are in the print lab
1:06:26 the terrific Jefferson Airplane song “White Rabbit” starts playing
1:08:30 Sean Penn returns and is now riding shotgun as Nicholas drives away from his house in a panic
1:11:20 the brothers argue with Nicolas standing near top a steep series of steps
1:12:37 silhouette image of Douglas
1:16:36 Nicolas brings detectives to the building that CRS was located except when they enter the floor that CRS was on the entire floor is empty and being renovated, reminded me of North by Northwest (1959) when Cary Grant’s character brings detectives to the mansion he was forced to drink liquor until he was black out drunk and of course everything incriminating is gone
1:24:33 surveillance angle shot of approaching silhouette figures before bullets are flying
1:32:38 POV shot from Nicolas’s perspective after being drugged, blurry yellow/green palette
1:33:20 superimposed image
1:34:34 great mise en scene in this image of Nicolas after waking up in Mexican Graveyard
1:34:48 long distance shot of Nicolas walking next to monument, looking extremely small by contrast
1:38:34 neon lights at night, Michael Mann like
1:44:35 Nicolas seeing James Rebhorn character on TV
1:50:45 pan across room revealing all the people in on The Game, green/blue palette
1:52:30 chased through staircase reminding me of raids during Seven (1995)
1:55:01 shallow focus surrounds stunned Nicolas
1:56:47 great sequence with Nicolas jumping off building, slow motion fall while passing green/blue lit building, triple edit of the fall through the glass
1:57:10 falls on the “X” of a air cushion that saves his life
1:58:28 final reveal of film, it was all planned and rare happy ending for Fincher
Thoughts:
A lesser Fincher film is still a Fincher film
Michael Doulgas plays a wealthy investment banker, but make no mistake about it this is no Gordon Gekko, Douglas character here Nicolas is miserable, lonely, and barely contains an ounce of Gordon Gekko’s charisma
It’s extremely ridiculous and you have to just accept that to enjoy it which is fine because it is quite enjoyable even though you eventually start to figure out what is happening
Definitely some strong Hitchcock inspiration here
– with a sort of twist on Hitchcock’s “wrong man on the run” as the paranoia is increasingly ramped up
– North by Northwest scene when Nicolas brings detectives to the building and floor of CRS only to see its now vacant
– You even have a drugged tea scene with POV shot similar to Notorious
– Character jumping of building like Vertigo
A fun rollercoasting ride
Verdict: R
Seven (1995)
Notes:
Starts with Morgan Freeman’s Somerset at a crime scene when Brad Pitt’s David Mills
1:15 Morgan Freemon as Lieutenant Sommerset played by Morgan Freemon
1:47 Detective Mills played by Brad Pitt
2:18 low angle tracking shot
3:57 close up on ticking clock as Sommerset lies in bed alone
4:20 Fincher does the opening credits better than most, montage of disturbing images with fast tempo music from Howard Shore
6:26 Mills wakes up in bed next to his wife played by Gwyneth Paltrow
8:00 rain of course, appropriate from the film’s dark mood
8:54 Sommerset and Mills enter dark building as crime scene
12:27 blue light from their flashlights, green/yellow silhouette
12:54 camera captures Mills and Sommerset in isolated shots inside dimly lit car during rainstorm
15 min the great R. Lee Ermey as police captain
15:44 switch to wide angle lens capturing entire office with Somerset on left side of frame, Mills on far right slumped over in chair, and the captain in background of frame behind office, the placement of the 3 characters speaks volumes
17:18 maybe best shot of film so far with low angle silhouette image with huge glass window in background of the frame
18:38 symmetrical shot
19:16 high angle surveillance camera shot, office that is now crime scene with “greed” written in blood on the floor
20:50 close up on Sommerset
27:08 tracking shot of Summerset in library
28:30 a couple minutes Summerset reading yet still cinematic with impressive editing with dissolves and back and forth between Summerset’s face and images of the books he’s looking through with some parallel editing showing Mills at his house
28:55 high angle shot with beautiful green lights placed throughout the library
29:29 aerial shot of city
31 min brown/black/gray mise en scene
34 min Gwyneth Paltrow makes appearance as wife of David Mills, she invited Sommerset for dinner to see her husband’s new partner
37:00 the reserved Sommerset bursts out laughing at train
39:18 reflection of crime scene photo in Sommerset’s eyeglasses shown in close up
45:11 intense royal blue color heavily saturated in print lab scene
50:56 low angle shot of narrow staircase as Swat Team enter
53:10 “sloth” written on crime scene
54 min even by the standards of this film this sequence is disturbing and grotesque
1:08:48 John Doe, who is later revealed to be played by Kevin Spacey, makes entrance in deep background of frame as he takes shots at Sommerset and Mills before running off
1:13:50 John Doe inverted shadow in puddle
1:14:12 incredible image of John Doe blurry shadow stretching across the frame with gun on left side of frame pressed up on head of Mills who is offscreen briefly
1:19:09 red lighting in photo room
1:20:03 low angle trunk shot
1:20:24 photograph of an earlier scene in the film
1:34:35 tracking shots
1:34:52 “detective!!!!” John Doe with Kevin Spacey visible for the first time, Doe is covered in blood and has fingertips cut off
1:36:50 Doe gives his special instructions through his lawyer
1:40:30 Sommerset and Mills shown in close ups as they put on a wire and dress in preparation for escorting John Doe, tension ramping up
1:41:27 overhead shot of helicopter following the police vehicle
1:41:43 overhead tracking shot
1:50:27 long shot
1:50:57 architecture as character way out in desert area surrounded by towers
1:52:23 binocular shot
1:53:37 low angle shot with blue sky in background of frame with white glare from sun
1:56:24 tension filled to the max, incredible suspense building
1:59:53 close ups on faces of three characters one at a time shown in isolated frames
2:00:21 low angle shot with tower in background separating Mills and Sommerset as Mills executes John Doe after horrifying revelation
2:01:48 ends with Sommerset’s narration of a great Ernest Hemingway quote, magic hour as film ends
Thoughts:
Fincher has been a favorite of mine for years, actually surprised it has taken me this long to get to him, but here we go:
Fincher turns on the opening credits into an art form with the hyper stylized graphics. Similar to PT Anderson’s Boogie Nights (1997) this is technically not Fincher’s debut, but it is certainly his breakthrough
This is an atmospheric film; the mood is dark throughout and this is achieved in several ways starting with the fact that much of the film takes place in dimly lit areas including crime scenes, insides of cabs and police cars, constant raining, lack of primary colors for much of the film, drab color palettes
Serial Killer fascination has reached peak level in the last 10-20 years, this is not the first film to focus on serial killers, Manhunter (1986) was one of the first and of course Silence of the Lambs (1991) was a landmark film. Still, it should be noted that this is one of the earlier serial killer films and certainly one of the very best
Some great imagery right from the opening credits. Around 17:18 features an immaculate silhouette image as the DA approaches the press. Another choice shot at 39:18 reflection of crime scene photo in Sommerset’s eyeglasses shown in close up. An even more impressive shot occurs at 1:14:12 with an image of John Doe blurry shadow stretching across the frame with gun on left side of frame pressed up on head of Mills who is offscreen briefly. At this point Doe is still a boogey man and that is exactly what this image is.
The final 15-20 minutes features some incredible aerial shots from POV of a police helicopter. You have architecture as character with the towers and a series of incredible, low angle shots straight from Orson Welles. Speaking of which the landscape during the final stretch as well as the color palette and lighting is all a distinct and noticeable contrast to the rest of the film which takes place in an unnamed city with rain in every outside scene
This features 4 terrific performances; Morgan Freeman, Brad Pitt, Kevin Spacey, and Gwyneth Paltrow. Ranking is tricky since Kevin Spacey is so incredible on a per minute basis while both Freeman and Pitt are terrific with far more screen time. Paltrow’s character appears in just a couple scenes (though she obviously factors into the plot in a huge way) but she is terrific in both of them making her character more than just a plot device
The wise elder detective and young gung ho partner is a common movie trope but here it provides some needed comic relief without going overboard (though Pitt comes close a couple times)
One of the most horrifying twists and endings of all time, the suspense created in that final sequence is palpable throughout as you know (assuming it’s your first time) that something horrible is going to happen, you just don’t know what. And even after you are aware of the twist it still hits just as hard on repeat viewings even if the element of surprise is gone
Verdict: MP