Weerasethakul. It’ll get to it in stylistic innovations/traits below—but there is no other auteur that makes films like Apichatpong Weerasethakul—completely distinct works that are interconnected, stylistic and narratively bold– and stick in your memory long after you’ve seen them. His strengths here for the purposes of this ranking is the work Syndromes and a Century (I have it just outside of my top 100 at #128) and the level of authorship in his entire body of work. He’s very well-respected by TSPDT as well- that that it influences my list but 4 of the 5 archiveable films below are already in the TSPDT top 1000—which is remarkable for a 21st century auteur especially.

Best film: Syndromes and a Century
- A visual atom bomb from Weerasethakul—his most accomplished and formally magnificent film to date. If you combine all the most gorgeous images from this, Tropical Malady and Blissfully Yours— 8 of the 10 from Syndromes and a Century
- A series of paintings constructed formally- you have a very stark sterile hospital vs a tropical green paradise outside—in many ways it’s the same short film repeated twice
- An ethereal romance
- Opens on a tree in the wind
- Weerasethakul’s obsession with medicine and then naturalism and greens
- Monks talking about their dreams—reincarnation
- Like almost all his films Weerasethakul is almost daring you to keep watching in the beginning of the film with slow starts
- The reflection shot in the window is a stunner- we’re at 24 minutes and it’s really the first beautiful shot- and then it’s on- minutes 24-50 are a series of stunning mise-en-scenes set sea of greens. Medium-long shots of foliage, again and again- unrelenting- much of the story is a flashback here—he clearly knows what he’s doing with mise-en-scene- a master
- And then he reshoots the job interview but this time with whites no longer set in the country. Stunning white set design- contrast—highly experimental
- Man-made statues as a statement
- An almost Cronenberg-like eeriness with machines- ethereal score long shot of a white vacuum sucking up life/air
- Don’t fully understand the people exercising in the park coda—perhaps a statement (from Tropical Malady as well but not as big a focal point) of the how we’re a caged animal- instead of being in nature we’re having to force ourselves to exercise in the park and look ridiculous


total archiveable films: 5
top 100 films: 0
top 500 films: 1 (Syndromes and a Century)

top 100 films of the decade: 3 (Syndromes and a Century, Blissfully Yours, Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives)

most overrated: It’s Tropical Malady for me which lands at #252 on the TSPDT critical consensus top 1000. This makes it one of the great films of the 2000’s (#8 of the decade) and I can’t find a spot for it in my top 100 of the decade. That’s a massive disconnect.
- Quote opening about how we’re all wild animals and then the images of the soldiers smiling and posing over a kill
- background making shorts works here combining works
- 10 minutes in before the credits and song
- Medicine is one of Weerasethakul’s obsessions- we have a dog (of one of the protagonists) dying. There’s discussions about how one of the two lovers will “never die a natural death”
- It’s a slow-moving neo-realist like (and rather toothless) love story first half
- Pop music again 53 minutes in and we go into a full break back out into country and the entire jungle stalking sequence- about half way in
- Is this love? Jealously? A dream?
- Seas of green in the mise-en-scene. 20 minutes of stalking, lost in night landscapes but Weerasethakul hasn’t fully learned to frame like he would in 2006’s Syndromes and a Century
- Tribal drawings intercut with jungle stalking second half
- The monkey speaks to one of the characters about how the tiger is his “prey and companion”
- Won the Jury prize at Cannes
- Sensory experience
- Duality is a motif for Weerasethakul for sure- two worlds, two halves- film breaks about half way through
- The musical cues are embellished and dissident—off—Godard in Contempt almost mocking conventional cinema
- Greens in the mise-en-scene — trees
- Western medicine- sterile- white
- You’re baffled 30 minutes in by the top 250 TSPDT status- again, I think it’s a ruse and a set-up for mystic naturalism finale like Blissfully Yours
- New credits half way in- tiger drawing
- Medication on repression- how we all hide
- Very much admire the formal construct and ingenuity but it’s tough viewing- excited for a future bluray release
- Final half is largely silent-
- Malick shot through trees up to the sun
- Dream/reincarnation/afterlife/ghost of cow
- HR
most underrated: Mostly, Weerasethakul extremely well respected- amongst the most of the 21st century auteurs– but Syndromes is at #651 on the TSPDT top 100 and it’s underrated. It should be #128.
gem I want to spotlight: Blissfully Yours
- Almost entirely static camera
- Weerasethakul’s background in shorts works combining vastly different segments here
- Greens all over the place—the first third of the film is at a clinic which is largely sterile and white but there is green painting. Then we have the second third which is the long car ride with the outdoor vistas, and then we have the sea of green jungle final third
- Long sequences in the car- neorealism? Transformation from tame/city to wild/rural jungle
- Weerasethakul obsessed with clinics and health- the opening is so banal- intentionally ugly?
- There’s a spirituality- animal traits- in the skin like a snake- de-evolution- Zoomorphism

- Credits and pop song 43 minutes in- wild- the break from civilization to country
- Voice over 47 minutes for the first time
- Free of influence largely—having said that- I couldn’t help but think of Renoir’s A Day in the Country with the Eden-like final third and also Weerasethakul uses the Terrence Malick shot of shooting the sun from the ground through the trees 4 times
- Weerasethakul super imposes a picture (I think meant to come from a character’s drawing) fright in the moving frame- haven’t seen that. Instinctual.

- Sexuality and jungle ambient noise
- Slow cinema- he’s certainly asking the viewer to do a lot of the heavy lifting- he’s the opposite of Nolan- not a lot of structure- lots of ambiguity
- Fads out in the middle of a voice over letter from back home which is strange
- Lots of stalking through the jungle- normal medium shot and cuts
- Are the two women (older and young) the same person? Is this a memory? Are they there to show juxtaposition in love? They do talk to each other but this is not a film/auteur where you worry about there being a definitive answer— are the two women mirrors- there is a sequence of them at the end where they are shot parallel laying down in a medium long shot- one alone crying, one in love
- Rhythmic, poetic, confident
- This is overused by critics but it’s a true mood piece
- Like Tropical Malady (his subsequent film) we have animal characteristics in a character in a love story—his skin is shedding. “you’re like a snake shedding skin”
- 15 minute opening is awful- arguing over pills and prescriptions. I think it’s meant by Weerasethakul to be ugly and city-urban-bound. Caged. It’s a rouse and set up even 25 minutes in as they drive out of the city. Even at 43 minutes we have the Greens in a pop song- two lovers—I think it means all the rest before this is bullshit and we’re escaping—sea of green jungle
- The umbrella shot coming through the trees that are shaping the frame is a stunner- precedes the best shot of Pan’s Labyrinth– there’s lighting in the background and shadows in foreground
- Picnic with a view shot is stunning as well
- HR- could go higher

stylistic innovations/traits:
- Cinema of sleep – that’s description—not a critique—it’s a stylistic identifier actually
Tropical surrealism- parallel realities—reincarnation— - A series of paintings constructed formally- you have a very stark sterile hospital vs a tropical green paradise outside
- Weerasethakul’s obsession with medicine and then naturalism and greens
- Like almost all his films Weerasethakul is almost daring you to keep watching in the beginning of the film with slow starts
- Duality is a motif for Weerasethakul for sure- two worlds, two halves- film breaks about half way through
- Tropical surrealism- parallel realities—reincarnation—tame vs. wild, urban vs rural
- The musical cues are embellished and dissident—off—Godard in Contempt almost mocking conventional cinema
- Greens in the mise-en-scene — trees
- Western medicine- sterile- white
- of stunning mise-en-scenes set sea of greens. Medium-long shots of foliage, again and again- unrelenting- much of the story is a flashback here—he clearly knows what he’s doing with mise-en-scene- a master
- dancing at the end of his films, caged animals critique
- There’s a spirituality- animal traits- in the skin like a snake- de-evolution- Zoomorphism
- Slow cinema- he’s certainly asking the viewer to do a lot of the heavy lifting- he’s the opposite of Nolan- not a lot of structure- lots of ambiguity
- Free of influence largely—uses the Terrence Malick shot of shooting the sun from the ground through the trees 4 times

- Weerasethakul super imposes a picture (I think meant to come from a character’s drawing) fright in the moving frame- haven’t seen that. Instinctual.
- Weerasethakul is so doggedly his own. Unless you watch a ton of cinema it’s hard to tell the difference between this and just slow cinema
- Weerasethakul’s background in short films comes through in the features
- a talented visual director who can inarguably set and design a frame—mise-en-scene master after syndromes and a century


top 10
- Syndromes and a Century
- Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives
- Blissfully Yours
- Tropical Malady
- Cemetery of Splendor
By year and grades
2002- Blissfully Yours | HR |
2004- Tropical Malady | HR |
2006- Syndromes and a Century | MP |
2010- Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives | MS |
2015- Cemetery of Splendor | R |
*MP is Masterpiece- top 1-3 quality of the year film
MS is Must-see- top 5-6 quality of the year film
HR is Highly Recommend- top 10 quality of the year film
R is Recommend- outside the top 10 of the year quality film but still in the archives
[…] 101. Apichatpong Weerasethakul […]
Hi Drake, I wonder sometimes that “Style-Minus” Directors like Richard Linklater, Sidney Lumet, Billy Wilder & Eric Rohmer are Great Directors but there is no other way or aesthetic in they could do their talking movies. But they made some Masterpieces in their own way. So, could you tell me some films or directors who made films like them but with Visual Storytelling like Lynch,Malick,Kar-Wai etc., Because I see don’t think there are directors who make films like them in that genres.
@RAVI KIRAN- Thanks for the comment 20 days ago before the site struggled for so long. Again, my apologies. This is a good question/discussion-but two things: 1. I’ll never agree that there is “no other way or aesthetic” to shoot a movie- regardless of the screenplay. and even if I did agree — 2. choosing the material you shoot is a factor. and then lastly 3. I admire and revere these films and filmmakers, I do– the point of the site and my rankings isn’t to say they are not worthy. However, when forced to compare or do a top 10 for a given year for example, I have to go with the films that go for more.
@Drake-But you said Sidney Lumet made sylistic choices behind the camera in 12 Angry Men. Like changing the lenses. Opting for more close ups as the movie goes on. Good use of blocking. A faboulous long take where at the end characters pose in a frozen cinematic painting. Creating an atmosphere. Doesn’t that make him a style-plus director? Or it hurts him that he never made a film like 12 Angry Men?
@Malith- Good point. Yeah, I mean those comments were made before I had another go at 12 Angry Men. I’m not sure if one film makes him a style-plus director- it depends on the context- certainly not on a list of the top 100 directors of all-time. But still, you make a good point.
Have you seen Memoria trailer. It looks like an auteur’s dream come true.
https://youtu.be/kMEb0cgyVww
I watched this just this morning, I am very excited for this one. I hope we don’t have to wait too long for a wide release – I’m very jealous of everyone at Cannes right now getting this, Annette, and The French Dispatch among others.
@Declan- It looks like it has been a great Cannes and we’re not done yet. Joanna Hogg’s The Souvenir has a 100 on Metacritic right now. After Yang is one I’ve had my eye on after Columbus in 2017. Farhadi, Joachim Trier, Sean Baker- strong reviews so far as well.
@M*A*S*H- Very exciting. Debuts in a few hours. Cemetery of Splendor was 2015 so this has been long in the waiting.
@ M*A*S*H.- first review here is glowing “Watching this film reminded me of when I was 17, hearing Revolution 9 on The White Album for the first time. It left a residue of happiness in my heart.” https://www.theguardian.com/film/2021/jul/15/memoria-review-apichatpong-weerasethakul-tilda-swinton
@Drake- thanks for sharing. I’m even more excited after the reviews.
It’s been a waco Cannes FF . Reviews for French dispatch , souvenir, Annette after yang are also great.
If you have to take a wild guess for Palm d’or, which film do you think can win?
@M*A*S*H- No idea. Wild guess? I’d say Drive My Car
Hi, Drake. Where did you watch his films? I’ve only been able to find very low-quality versions online and I don’t want to ruin my first viewing with them. I know that Mysterious Object at Noon is on Criterion, but that’s it. Readers of the site, please feel free to chime in.
Thanks.
It’s definitely not easy. I’m not sure if you have a VPN, but if you switch it to Australia you can watch Uncle Boonmee on Mubi at the moment, and Cemetery of Splendour on SBS On Demand (a free ad-based Australian streaming site). Uncle Boonmee is also on Kanopy, though I think the selection of films on that service depends on which library you sign up through.
I also bought a physical copy of Syndromes and a Century online a while ago, and that took two months to arrive. Other than that, I haven’t had much luck.
@Declan – Thank you for the help. I do have VPN, so I’ll try that. As for physical copies, it’s hard because I’m going to uni in, like, a month so I should probably wait and order one there.
@Pedro – I’m sorry- I don’t remember now. Hopefully Declan and others can help. A number of them had to be streaming – maybe the criterion channel or iteration of the criterion channel before it was actually called the criterion channel (filmstruck I think). I may have also had access to a few on the dvd/bluray neflix option. But I hear you, I hate spoiling a viewing with a lower than ideal online quality. I’m very fussy about the quality.
@Drake – That’s alright, thanks. I found a nice version of Cemetery of Splendor, so that one is all good; and I watched Syndromes and a Century yesterday with okay quality and it was amazing, so I guess it’s fine. I’ll have to see it again, anyway, so hopefully I can order a physical copy online like Declan did.
So apparently Memoria is never getting a streaming or physical media release, but instead will rotate through cities week by week and play in theatres forever.
https://www.indiewire.com/2021/10/memoria-apichatpong-weerasethakul-neon-nationwide-tour-release-1234669107/
It’s a fascinating approach, seems sort of like an art installation that way. I’m seeing it next month at Sydney Film Festival (along with Parallel Mothers) and couldn’t be more excited.
@Declan- ugh, I hope this is mostly a PR stunt. This would be a shame. But this is exciting for you coming up!
Blissfully Yours MS
Tropical Malady MP
Syndromes and a Century MS
Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives MP
Cemetery of Splendor HR
Memoria HR