best film: City Lights from Chaplin. M from Lang is a fine choice as well—both would be the single best film in virtually any year in the 1930’s (outside of perhaps 1939 with Renoir’s The Rules of the Game).

from the opening of Chaplin’s City Lights- the best film of 1931

M from Lang (here) is a fine choice as well—both would be the single best film in virtually any year in the 1930’s (outside of perhaps 1939 with Renoir’s The Rules of the Game)
most underrated: The 3 Penny Opera from Pabst. The TSPDT consensus has it way down at #1782—barely in the top 2000—but it makes the top 500 on my list.
- I’m not overly familiar with Brechtian style so have to do my best here to analyze the film based on my cinema knowledge. I do know that Brecht believed in the distancing effect—or the alienation/estrangement effect which basically (again, as I understand it) is about how he doesn’t want the audience to overly emphasize with his characters and I see that here and how powerfully it works
- Depression-era hard-hit Germany. It centers on the lower depths of society, crime, money, bread, survival, poverty—gorgeous opening shot down an alley.
- Talented shot by Pabst- reflection in glass at the absolute perfect angle
- A roving camera throughout—plenty of shots behind windows
- The dialogue is largely unspoken—looks and glances and quite effective
- Busy mise-en-scene in the alleys and bars
- Heavy use of glass and mirrors
- Mackie- “Mack the Knife”- master of the underground- seedy vs Peachum who is beggar king
- The songs—(done largely by “the street singer” Ernst Busch) are a formal element. Strong. I’ve seen it influence everything after from Cabaret (he’s the Joel Grey character- a sort of narrator that isn’t in the story really or the main narrative). Perhaps not on the nose but I can also see its influences on Pennies From Heaven, Dancer in the Dark, Demy, and Berlin Alexanderplatz—this is a far cry from Hollywood escapism musicals that would come after
- I wish Pabst had shot Pandora’s Box this way—I love the male gaze factor, narrative arc and Louise Brooks’ performance/character but this film is directed more strongly by Pabst
- A stunner of a shot through a brothel. Tracking shot like Murnau and some nice mise-en-scene/décor clutter and detail like Caligari or on Sternberg
- Nihilistic and dark
- Narrator talking to the camera- “Even you won’t see this turn in the story coming” (paraphrase)—reflexive and breaking the 4th wall
- The coronation parade is built up throughout as the big day and the payoff spectacle is worth the wait and anticipation. It reminds me of Schlesinger’s The Day of the Locust and Scorsese’s Gangs of New York with it being sort of a street riot and explosion
- The “Mack the Knife” song is wonderful- even nearly 100 years later
- Shadowy dystopia—a mesh between depression-era realism and an expressive mise-en-scene

The 3 Penny Opera from Pabst. The TSPDT consensus has it way down at #1782—barely in the top 2000—but it makes the top 500 on my list.

Shadowy dystopia—a mesh between depression-era realism and an expressive mise-en-scene
most overrated: Tabu from Murnau lands at #250 on the TSPDT consensus list. This is masterpiece territory. I couldn’t even find a spot for it in my top 10 of 1931 (the consensus has it #3)—I look forwad to a revisit- I’ve only been able to catch it once- and once is never enough for an auteur on the level of Murnau.
gem I want to spotlight: La Chienne from Renoir
- Renoir’s first sound film, first archiveable film
- There is some really nice work with some of what would come to be known as the Renoir trademarks- he does a great job doing a shot, tracking the action, reframing, and doing it again. It’s simple but revolutionary in 1931, elegant and powerful
- What looks like a hand-held camera working and tracking during the waltz scene- very well done
- Framing in the window with the flower bed in the bottom of the mise-en-scene- goes back to it later and then for the 3rd time during the epic murder scene
- Very nice touch with the punch and judy intro
- This is a harsh and ugly serious film for a Renoir film
- Great tracking show of men in a row drinking
- Top 5 of the year quality

what would come to be known as the Renoir trademarks- he does a great job doing a shot, tracking the action, reframing, and doing it again. It’s simple but revolutionary in 1931, elegant and powerful
trends and notables: This is the first year where it became really difficult to push great films off my top 10 of the year. Films like Tabu, The Criminal Code from Hawks and The Front Page. I think it’s a combination of things coinciding in a really strong year but chief amongst those is directors, in larger numbers, finally figuring out sound and starting to improve their quality of work. Lang and Chaplin are the big story with the two best films, the best film from each of them respectively. It’s the first archvieable film from Ozu, Hawks, and Renoir— these are giants of 20th century cinema– three names that would help secure the case for cinema as a legit form of art. James Whale, and Frank Capra aren’t far behind. It is just an incredible crop of auteurs. This coincides with the tragic death of Murnau at the age of 42—sad. Rene Clair gives us two films in the top 10 (in a competitive year) so that’s worth noting. Frankenstein and Dracula find a spot in the top 10 as well—a big year for Universal horror. The incoming class of actors is as strong as the directors—it isn’t surprising as the silent stars begin to fade that you’d have a new crop come along. 1931 marks the first archiveable film for Clark Gable (A Free Soul), Edward G. Robinson (Little Caesar), Irene Dunne (Cimarron), James Cagney (The Public Enemy, Taxi), Peter Lorre (M) and Boris Karloff (Frankenstein and The Criminal Code).

Frankenstein and Dracula find a spot in the top 10 as well—a big year for Universal horror

Rene Clair gives us two films in the top 10 (in a competitive year) so that’s worth noting– this is from Le Million

and this from Clair’s À Nous la Liberté

James Cagney in the famous/infamous grapefruit smash scene in The Public Enemy– one of the many of the talented incoming class of actors including Lorre, Gable, Irene Dunne, and Edward G. Robinson
best performance male: There is a healthy competition in this category for 1931. Charlie Chaplin and Peter Lorre may give the two best male performances of the decade in City Lights and M respectively. I’m not even going to attempt to pick between the two—both are evidence that acting is an artform. Michel Simon is not far behind in La Chienne. His range is really on display when you throw in his work as Boudu the following year.

There is a healthy competition in this category for 1931. Charlie Chaplin and Peter Lorre may give the two best male performances of the decade in City Lights and M respectively…

…towering tour-de-force performances— I’m not even going to attempt to pick between the two—both are evidence that acting is an artform
best performance female: She isn’t quite as strong as Simon—but I’ll give a mention for Janie Marèse from Renoir’s La Chienne. Tragically, Marèse was struck down by an automobile (I believe on the set of the film just after wrapping) and killed at the young age of 23.
top 10
- City Lights
- M
- La Chienne
- Le Million
- The 3 Penny Opera
- Frankenstein
- Kameradschaft
- The Public Enemy
- À Nous la Liberté
- Dracula
Archives, Directors, and Grades
À nous la liberté- Clair | HR |
A Free Soul- C. Brown | R |
An American Tragedy – von Sternberg | R |
Cimarron- Ruggles | R |
City Lights- Chaplin | MP |
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde- Mamoulian | R |
Dracula– Browning | HR |
Frankenstein -Whale | MS |
Kameradschaft- Pabst | HR |
La Chienne– Renoir | MS |
Le Million- Clair | MS |
Little Caesar- LeRoy | R |
M- Lang | MP |
Monkey Business- McLeod | R |
Platinum Blonde- Capra | R |
Svengali- Mayo | R |
Tabu- Murnau | R |
Taxi – Del Ruth | R |
The 3 Penny Opera– Pabst | MS |
The Champ- K. Vidor | R |
The Criminal Code- Hawks | R |
The Front Page- Milestone | HR |
The Public Enemy- Wellman | HR |
The Sin of Madelon Claudet- Selwyn | R |
The Smiling Lieutenant- Lubitsch | R |
Tokyo Chorus – Ozu | R |
*MP is Masterpiece- top 1-3 quality of the year film
MS is Must-See- top 5-6 quality of the year film
HR is Highly Recommend- top 10 quality of the year film
R is Recommend- outside the top 10 of the year quality film but still in the archives
chaplin in city lights is up there with otoole in lawrence, hoffman in the graduate, deniro in taxi and bull, and garland in wizard.
@m – I think they’re right. In the best male performance section I say it is a landslide for Lorre and I don’t think that’s the case with Chaplin as strong as he is in City Lights. Good call.
I just saw The Public Enemy. Great gangster movie. I love gangster(easily one of my favorite genres) coming of age movies. I also like movies about the rise and fall of a man (citizen Kane for example). I think The public enemy is a remarkable movie.
What is your favorite genre Drake? What genre are most of your top 500 films? What would your top 5 (or 10) gangster films of all time be?
@Azman— good questions. It may frustrate you but I really don’t have a favorite genre. I think auteur cinema is the best regardless of the genre– some focus on one more than others (Hitchcock) and others bounce around more (Kubrick). I haven’t thought about genre too much because again genre definitions are tough. There are some films that are clearly gangster films and others that are are sot of blends. Either way I’d have to think any gangster genre film list starts with the two Godfather films and Goodfellas… Breathless… is that a gangster movie? Kind of, right? Pulp Fiction? That’s just where I sort of lose interest in the topic. Sorry.
1931 is easily one of the greatest years in cinema history. Any year that has a movie the quality of city lights, is a truly remarkable year. Also, any year that has m as the 2nd best film and the public enemy as the 7th best movie is special.
@Azman- I never thought about 1931 like that but you’re right. Dracula is a pretty special 10th best movie as well.
@Azman– also- you should check out (if you haven’t already) Little Caesar and from 1932 Scarface from Howard Hawks- these trio are often brought up together and credited for starting the genre. Hawks’ film is the best but they’re all good.
Drake, if genre/style doesnt matter to you, why do you completely disregard documentaries. You like various different genres and you praise the variety of different directorial styles. Yet you dont archive documentaries.
@Azman. Couple things– good question. Style and genre are totally different. Style is everything to me. Basically on every review and every page here that’s all I write about.
Genre matters, but ranking the best horror movies or arguing about whether Pulp Fiction is a gangster movie or something doesn’t. Is Jaws horror? Is Silence of the Lambs? If I did a list of best gangster movie or horror that’s all it would become and that part of it doesn’t interest me. I do love genre films, discussions on genre (howard hawks work, kubrick’s work– all important). Sorry. I hope that clarifies.
Content and a films message really doesn’t matter to me. I care how a film or director convey’s that message (that’s the film’s style) — but what the actual message/point is doesn’t. Ebert has some quote that basically says film style isn’t what a film says but how it says it.
I’ve found documentaries most often care more about what a film says. Very message focused. There are exceptions I’m sure but by and large that’s the goal of a documentary. I studied them in college, have seem some throughout the years and am happy with my choice. I don’t do music videos either (and some auteurs got their start in very artistic music videos). I don’t do experimental films for the most part (some fiction features really toe the line) and/or shorts either (with a few exceptions). By and large I don’t do series television (I’d do a 4 or 8 or 15 hour movie if its on television and directed by Refn, Bergman, Kieslowski, etc). There are so many films to see. I’ve got 100+ years of movies, 40 archiveable films a year or so— so that’s 4000 archiveable movies and I’m adding more all the time. I’m swamped. haha. If someone likes documentaries and wants to spend their time there– totally cool. I’m just happy doing what I do.
@Azman— sorry– all that and I didn’t even really answer it. I don’t think documentary is a genre. I guess that’s how I’d answer that.
You said you dont want to argue or decide whether a film is horror or not, gangster crime or not because they have elements of different genres. so how do you decide whether a film like close up is documentary or not. Surely close up has elements of narrative fiction and documentary. It’s not a ‘complete/specific’ documentary if you know what I mean.
That being said I do agree with your point. Many films have elements of different genres. You watch a lot of movies so you may not have time to watch documentaries , shorts etc. That’s fine it’s your choice but your exclusion of close up and inclusion of Life and Nothing More (and life goes on)confuses me because they are both essentially documenting an incident of the past. They both blur the line between narrative fiction and a documentary and can be classified as both. I love both the films. Kiarostami is a brilliant director.
@Azman—- I see your point but Kiarostami is rare. There aren’t many directors or films in cinema’s history where, after watching them, I’m like “was that a documentary or fiction film?”– like one- maybe late Godard but I’m not a massive admirer of late-Godard either so it makes it pretty easy.
just rewatched the goodfellas. whenever i watch it it or any of those gangster movies even though im not italian i start talking about whacking and ‘what the hells the matter with you’. such great escapism.
Most Italians actually would not be able to relate to Goodfellas. Only Italian-Americans or Americans in general. I live in Toronto and I can sometimes relate to the gangsters and how racist everyone is to each other haha. Thats why I love the ending of Mean Streets when a racists, cruel and stupid guy like Charlie get punished for his sins and then Scorsese cuts to an image of the Black girl he stood up. Its sad because the racist,violent aspects of gangsters from the 20th century is still present today even in multicultured places like the US or Canada.
I’m just curious. You seem to praise Goodfellas a lot. Is it your favorite gangster movie? If not what is? I always like getting recommendations and hearing the opinions of other cinephiles. Haha
probably. or godfather ii. i dont watch too many gangster films. if were talking crime films, tcm is showing my favorite, badlands.
I love the gangster genre because it is so broad in terms of definition. Anything involving a large group of people doing organised criminal acts would be gangster crime. It’s so varied. Pulp fiction, the testament of dr mabuse, heat, the godfather and band of outsiders are all gangster movies but extremely different to each other. Many crime movies, in essence are gangster movies.
My God, imagine doing Metropolis and M and be in second place, poor Lang, although i must say that in 31 i prefer M but i respect your decision.
Did Lang ever give the best movie of the year?
@Aldo- http://thecinemaarchives.com/2020/08/27/1921/
Sorry, I forgot, even if i looked for it and did not find it, what did you use to see Destiny?
There is a lot to unpack here, so i think I will ask several questions, i hope you don’t mind
I remember in the best performances in history you named Lorre in M, does that make Chaplin in City Lights one of the best? since you gave them a draw here
@Aldo- yes- I mean I don’t have a running list of the best performances that I’ve actually sat down and listed– but I wouldn’t get too far if I did before getting to both Lorre in M and Chaplin in City Lights
You mention the tragic death of Murnau, together with Tarkovsky die at a very young age 1.Tarkovsky and 2. Murnau is not competition as it is a sad fact, that other directors died young?
@Aldo- there are many. Fassbinder at 36, Jean Vigo was 29. Truffaut only 52. here are some more
https://www.filmcomment.com/article/film-comments-trivial-top-20-expanded-to-40-best-directors-who-died-young/
Did you forgot to mention Cagney in Public Enemies?I thought you mentioned him above Chaplin in City Lights in the previous update.Poor Cagney.
Are there any years where you would give the directing award or Best Director Oscar to someone different than the director of the best film? Obviously, you value direction the most in a movie’s quality and typically align your choices of the greatest films with the directing work that you admire the most. However, it seems that may not be the case for 1931, where you select City Lights as the best film, despite seeming to admire Lang’s work as a director much more. Are there any other years for which this is true? Perhaps 1977, with Annie Hall’s creative screenplay giving it the edge over Suspiria’s visuals?
@Graham- It certainly doesn’t happen enough that I would ever have a “best director” category on my archives by year pages. It is essentially the same thing. The only time it would work is if a director made two films in one year. If a director made the second best film, and like the fourth best film- I’d probably be inclined to give it to that person over the director who made the best film. I’d still give it to Woody in 1977 and as for 1931– you’re correct to read into this one. What you may be hearing here in my voice is me hedging my bets about putting City Lights over M.
I’d say It’s A Wonderful Life is the best film of 1946, but Hitchcock would be my best director choice for Notorious.
That’s really close though.
On further scrutiny, I now believe Notorious is superior to It’s A Wonderful Life, so forget what I said.
@Drake- I think you owe Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde another watch. I saw it recently and it is one of the most innovative movies of the year- I was stunned: POV, long Coppola-like dissolves, long takes, split screen transitions, shooting character looking himself in mirror (almost on the same level as Being John Malkovich) and plus that transformation scenes. And on top of that you have a tour de force performance from Frederic March.
For now I am having it as HR/MS and the best surprise of the year.
Agreed, it’s one of my favorite horror films. Mamoulian drives the Freudian themes pretty hard with great artistic flair. A predictable criticism would be to say that March’s Hyde is more of a comically gross figure than a horrific one, but that’s the bloody point: Hyde is not supposed to be a demon, he’s supposed to represent the liberation of civilized man’s repressed desires for indulgence and the ability to do whatever he wants (which means being comically gross and animalistic, hence the ape look). The brilliance of March’s performance is that he conveys the refinement, genius, passionate ambition, curiosity, repression, frustration, and the eventual guilt and self loathing of Jekyll, and the emancipation from all restraints manifested in Hyde.