best film: Barry Lyndon from Stanley Kubrick
- There are a few films that may be equal to Barry Lyndon’s visual beauty (from Days of Heaven, In the Mood For Love, others– including works from the great Kubrick himself) – but none that are comfortably superior.
- Many aspects of Kubrick’s masterpiece are worthy of praise, but I want to get to the main point quickly – the film is driven by a rigorous, formal, visual approach using technology (the zoom lens) on masterful compositions. The Shining is largely driven by tracking shots (through the advent and development of the Steadicam) and here it is the camera zoom, and it has never been used better (though Altman in the other massive 1975 masterpiece Nashville is close). In 50+ compositions, Kubrick either starts in a close-up and slowly zooms out to reveal a gorgeously mounted cinematic landscape painting, or, he starts in the wider shot with the gorgeously mounted cinematic painting, and slowly zooms in for a closer look.
- Kubrick uses the purposefully trivial titles for his two-part (with epilogue) epic
- brilliant use of Piano Trio in E Flat by Schubert
- Filming took place over the course of two years and 300 days—many shots taking 25, 50, 100 times- certainly more David Fincher (Kubrick predates Fincher obviously) than Eastwood

The opening frame is a duel—which is fitting. It is a frame Kubrick holds, there are varying depths of field on display– different natural level elevations and obstructions giving it a rich complexity
- The wry voice-over from Michael Hordern lets Kubrick’s camera zoom in and out (there are a few camera movements but not many) and there isn’t honestly that much in-scene dialogue to catch for a 3+ hour film. The lack of in-scene dialogue lets the lens float in and out on the models holding poses. Certainly, it feels like it has to be an influence on Roy Andersson. Von Trier is a big admirer of the film. We have the savage voice-over (Dogville) and those establishing shots that he uses as chapter breaks in Breaking the Waves. Kubrick is clearly influenced by the work of Thomas Gainsborough with those landscapes.
- Kubrick constantly defuses the narrative by letting Hordern’s voice spoil the story– giving away the plot points before they happen. “as you’ll soon see”. Kubrick even cuts off his own narrator mid-sentence during an obituary (telling you how he feels about death) just before the intermission
- It is all a charade to Kubrick- the cold, pristine, instructive way he delivers the life of this man—the absurdity of the seven-year war backdrop, love, lust, greed, it is all undercut by his caustic sense of humor and nihilistic worldview. Cynically, the ups and downs of Barry Lyndon’s life are revealed, “wandering” used in the text several times. A chilly randomness to this life

Much has been made of the triumph of natural lighting and Kubrick’s work with candles and the praise and hype is all warranted…makes for a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut — Christmas lights in Eyes Wide Shut and the work with candles here
- There are too many sublime cinematic paintings to grab. the 75th best frame in Barry Lyndon is stronger than the best composition from most films. There are somewhere between 50 and 100 and most held for an enjoyably long duration. . The introduction of Lady Lyndon hallway through the film almost exactly at 92 minutes with the tracking shot and the zoom in on here didn’t make the cut, the shot of the pool and the gardens at 98 minutes that looks like it is out of Last Year at Marienbad didn’t either. The shot of two in close-up with O’Neal smoking at 105 minutes doesn’t either.
- Several times we get the magnificent castle reflecting off the pond shot establishing shot
- Awe-inspiring costume work and period detail and specificity—this has passed every film before it in this regard and influenced every period film since from Marie Antoinette to The Favourite
- Makes for a companion piece with A Clockwork Orange and not just because of the camera zooms. This novel (from Thackeray) is said to be the first one without a hero and that had to appeal to Kubrick

At the 140-minute mark- the shot of his son on his lap with the massive painting backdrop is a jaw-dropper
- At 143- minutes the dining table natural light pouring in composition — spectacular

There is a one-minute long tracking shot of his step-son walking into the bar to challenge him to a duel at the 160 minute mark. O’Neal is passed out on the chair with other drunks posing. It is one of the greatest single frames in cinema history
- Starts with a duel, ends with a duel—we get the windows with the light pouring in for the final battle
most underrated: Fox and His Friends from R.W. Fassbinder. Fox and His Friends from Fassbinder features not only his immaculate direction and work behind the camera (indeed this is Fassbinder’s third time in four years with at top 10 of the year film) but a brilliant lead performance from him as well. The melodrama itself is a tragic fable clearly influenced by Douglas Sirk- but frankly this is even more depressing and despairing than anything Sirk made. It is not in the TSPDT consensus top 1000 and should be.

it isn’t just the melodrama genre that is Sirkian, the obscuring of the frame here on the left, the interior design work. Visconti is another hero of Fassbinder. And this shot would be at home in any number of the great Italian master’s films

don’t be fooled by the denim and bell-bottoms, this is a beautiful tragic pose flanked by a sea of deep cobalt blue
most overrated: There are a few ways to go here. I’ve seen Jeanne Dielman once and didn’t archive it- so that is probably the choice (it is #85 on the TSPDT consensus). I hope with a second viewing I’ll find more to admire. I think it borders on the experimental line of where I divide fiction cinema. There are films on the experimental side of that line (the Stan Brakhage/ Maya Deren space) and this could be one. I certainly praise and appreciate slow cinema (I admire Tarkovsky and Bela Tarr amongst others) and glacial formal rigor is up my alley as well, but this is hours of a woman cleaning a house and I couldn’t pick up on the stylistic, cinematographically or visual rhythms and interesting shots/editing. As I said I’ll watch again but for now I can’t get behind it. The ranking for Angelopoulos’ The Traveling Players is also high on the TSPDT list (#204) for a film that does not land in my top 10 of 1975. I’ve seen the film, but it was fifteen years ago on some terrible bootleg copy—so there’s no grade and I really can’t count it.
gems I want to spotlight: Nashville is a massive artistic achievement and the crown jewel in the Altman oeuvre. It has a large ensemble, overlapping dialogue, wonderfully used camera zooms to capture exactly what Altman wants to eavesdrop on and edit in scene. It is ambitious filmmaking and clearly has influenced everyone from PT Anderson (there’s no Magnolia without Altman) to John Sayles (Lonestar, Matewan). Nashville is comic, tragic, and politically potent. If you want a few recommendations off the top 10 list both Three Days of the Condor and The Day of the Locust are worth seeking out. Condor is a taut political thriller just a notch below The Parallax View with stellar performances from Redford, Dunaway and a few key scenes with von Sydow. Schlesinger’s gloriously messy Day of the Locust has some exceptional cinematography from Conrad Hall and a big, blowout massacre climax that has certainly stuck with me.

Sydney Pollack was never the artist Pakula was, but this is inspired direction and camera placement here in Three Days of the Condor

one of the best shots of 1975 comes off the top 10 of the year– this shot from The Day of the Locust from John Schlesinger (making interesting films for more than a decade now in 1975) and Conrad Hall (DP)
trends and notables:
- 1975 is another magnificent year. The front-half of the decade is superior to the back-half. 1975 alone includes eight (8) films in the top forty (40) roughly of the 1970’s decade.

The year features two rare-bird sightings here with both a Tarkovsky (Mirror here) film and a Kubrick film in a single year. There’s no way anyone could’ve known it at the time (ok maybe Kubrick’s 300 day shooting schedule was an indicator) but each of these masters would only have three films remaining after this

truly a cinematic painting here in Tarkovsky’s Mirror. Spielberg and his DP Vilmos Zsigmond would echo this shot in 1977’s Close Encounters of the Third Kind
- I mention this above in the gem section but 1975 is the top of the summit for the great Robert Altman

Jaws clearly has a big impact on the box office (unlike The Godfather and The Exorcist he avoids the R-rating), the summer movie. It is great artistic and stylistic achievement in its own right- a breakthrough for the young prodigy Spielberg (who still isn’t 30).

the famous dolly zoom

Salo is Pasolini’s last film- it was supposed to be the first in a three-part series (trilogy of death)- he was murdered weeks before the premiere

Pasolini had his debut in 1961, Accattone– one of his strongest efforts, and Teorema is a worthy candidate, but with the astonishing artistry on display in Salo– it is clearly his magnum opus.

The wallpaper use is sublime throughout but in particular the wild wallpaper used when the pianist jumps out of the window

repeated shots of characters in profile looking out the window in jaw-droppingly splendid interior-designed arrangements

1975 marks the height of the “early, funny” films of Woody Allen with Love and Death. He’d take 1976 off behind the camera (a rarity for him) and when he’d emerge in 1977 he’d have a new sort of tone and style in a little film called Annie Hall

three very noteworthy auteurs make their first foray into the archives in 1975: David Cronenberg (Shivers), Terry Gilliam (co-directing Monty Python and the Holy Grail) and Peter Weir (Picnic at Hanging Rock)– shown here

this shot, from Weir’s film, is a precursor to the shot del Toro uses in Pan’s Labyrinth link here
best performance male: What a year 1975 is for Jack Nicholson. It is really the culmination of an impressive run that started back in 1969 with Easy Rider. Nicholson would be in great films before 1975 (Chinatown for one) and after (The Shining)- but to be both the center of a masterpiece Antonioni film (and like Red Desert with Vitti—Jack really dominates the screen solo here as far as acting goes) and gives the ultimate, “Jack” large-persona performance and Oscar-win in Forman’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. Jack gives two of the best three performances of 1975. The other, is the remarkable Al Pacino, who is having quite the decade himself. Pacino’s work in Dog Day Afternoon is so polar opposite to The Godfather: Part II. Here in Lumet’s film he’s frazzled, spitting—with the great “Attica” scene. Pacino now has mentions in this category in 1972, 1973, 1974 and 1975—obviously more that most great actors have in a lifetime. Robert Shaw is next. I actually think the first half of the film is stronger than the second but the first half is all Spielberg showing off (and I’m not complaining)—the second half is almost all Shaw and the capper is the USS Indianapolis monologue. I think Richard Dreyfuss and Roy Scheider can sort of split a mention here- both are great—and I’ll give a split mention to the two-hander in John Huston’s The Man Who Would Be King. James Bond (Sean Connery) and Harry Palmer (Michael Caine) are very good. Lastly—the curious case of Ryan O’Neal. He’s in just about every scene of a three-hour Kubrick masterpiece and the best film of the year. I think I’m going to omit O’Neal here. You could write an entire paper on Ryan O’Neal and whether he’s the right actor for the job, or it is a good performance. I’ve seen the film five times and I don’t think it is either a brilliant performance or a horrible one. I do wish another actor was in the role and that’s not a sign of being worthy of a spot here. Apparently, Warner Brokers told Kubrick he has to have a top 10 star at the time of financing to back the film and given the age of the character it was either going to be O’Neal or Redford and Redford turned it down. With a lesser budget and better actor I don’t think we have the same film. O’Neal certainly doesn’t ruin the film (far from it given the masterpiece status) but he isn’t one of the major reasons it is on that level either.

this from The Passenger, part of Jack’s unassailable 1975 1-2 punch that included his Oscar-winning performance in Once Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest as well. PTA would modify a version of this shot for The Master with Phoenix overhanging the ship

Pacino’s “Attica” moment from Dog Day Afternoon. It is rarely rare that acting alone can give me cinematic chills
best performance female: It is frustratingly quiet here. Of course, I don’t blame the actresses, there were so many with immense talent during this era, I blame the system—but regardless- there simply isn’t much here. I’m going to agree with the Academy here and go with Louise Fletcher in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. Her adversary in the film, Nicholson, is all color and animation—but Fletcher’s more thankless role is poised and iron clad– Fletcher is brilliant at it. She’s the establishment. Behind her the capable Lily Tomlin gives the best single performance in Nashville (an ensemble so deep it’s really hard to pick from for these categories).

Lily Tomlin here in Altman’s Nashville. Altman’s camera dives in via his patented zoom in the single greatest acting moment of Altman’s masterpiece
top 10
- Barry Lyndon
- Nashville
- The Passenger
- Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom
- Jaws
- One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest
- Dog Day Afternoon
- Mirror
- The Man Who Would Be King
- Fox and His Friends

The finale of The Passenger is genius—you cannot escape fate—slow moving tracking shot, there are bars which create the framing, the old man, the dog, the kid, Maria showing up again, police coming in, the sound design is impeccable- it had to influence Cuaron’s Roma— we have the beautiful structure as a backdrop. The camera moves out into the street through the bars, pivots, goes back through the bars to show death, fate, certainty—it is one of cinema’s greatest single shots. It lasts seven minutes. And this shot is one of the reasons I know what the world “penultimate” means.

a sublime frame here from Antonioni– Almodovar actually has a similar shot in 2019’s Pain and Glory – link here

from Dario Argento’s Deep Red-– this masterful shot is just one of many from from the film

another here from Argento. For horror enthusiasts it is often cited as the first slasher film– somewhere between Powell’s Peeping Tom and Carpenter’s Halloween

the meeting of high art and genre cinema from Argento yet again

from Truffaut’s The Story of Adele H.– quietly, Truffaut has two films already from the 1970’s in the top 10 of their respective year (The Wild Child, Two English Girls) and two films very close to their years’ top 10 (Adele H, Day For Night)
Archives, Directors, and Grades
| Barry Lyndon – Kubrick | MP |
| Cousin cousine – Tacchella | R |
| Deep Red- Argento | HR |
| Dersu Uzala – Kurosawa | R/HR |
| Dog Day Afternoon- Lumet | MS/MP |
| Fox and His Friends- Fassbinder | HR |
| French Connection II– Frankenheimer | R |
| Hard Times- W. Hill | R |
| Jaws- Spielberg | MP |
| Love and Death- Allen | HR |
| Monty Python and the Holy Grail – Gilliam, T. Jones | R/HR |
| Nashville- Altman | MP |
| Night Moves- A. Penn | R |
| One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest- Forman | MP |
| Picnic at Hanging Rock- Weir | |
| Rollerball – Jewison | R |
| Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom – Pasolini | MP |
| Shampoo-Ashby | HR |
| Shivers – Cronenberg | R |
| Smile- Ritchie | R |
| The Day of the Locust- Schlesinger | HR |
| The Fortune- M. Nichols | |
| The Man in the Glass Booth- Hiller | R |
| The Man Who Would Be King- Huston | HR/MS |
| Mirror – Tarkovsky | MS |
| The Passenger – Antonioni | MP |
| The Story of Adele H.- Truffaut | HR |
| The Sunshine Boys- Ross | R |
| The Traveling Players- Angelopoulos | |
| The Wilby Conspiracy – Nelson | R |
| The Wind and the Lion- Milius | R |
| Three Days of the Condor- Pollack | HR |
*MP is Masterpiece- top 1-3 quality of the year film
MS is Must-See- top 5-6 quality of the year film
HR is Highly Recommend- top 10 quality of the year film
R is Recommend- outside the top 10 of the year quality film but still in the archives
@Drake – is The Rocky Horror Picture show archived by any chance? Im planning on watching it in the near future along with Clue after hearing the passing of the great Tim Curry (im really gonna miss him).
@Drake- Have you seen Maîtresse (1975) directed by Barbet Schroeder?
Matt Damon selected this film on his recent visit to the Criterion closet.
I think both Funny Lady (1975) and For the Boys (1991) are very similar films. With the singing aspect centering on a big diva performance. Also, both films are very big productions spanning a lot of years. However there are two main differences. One is the main characters being older (around 15 years) in For the Boys – so this a very old school movie. The other being For the Boys using a flashback story structure which Funny Lady does not use. The two different approaches are fascinating because it’s kind of the same material.
One could say Funny Lady is more hard to follow and confusing but have more immediacy and is less sentimental. For the Boys is a more expansive shoot than Funny Lady because it goes from US to Korea to Vietnam etc. It’s a series of vignettes. So, the flashback story structure is kind of essential. Funny Lady was a top 10 Box Office film for 1975 but For the Boys didn’t do that well aside from an Oscar nomination for Bette Midler (This is kind of wild comparing with Funny Lady because Streisand wasn’t nominated despite being in a much bigger hit and Funny Lady having more Oscar nominations).
For the Boys feels like a film out of time and place in a very different cinematic landscape and audience taste. Which is a cool thing because it’s kind of pure 1970’s nostalgia. One thing I love about the film is it does not have a romantic relationship at its centre. But rather a professional one. Which is quite unique. The central characters are bonded by their mutual love for Midler’s son. It’s not all happiness and glamour here though. There is a lot of doom and gloom in here. And one critical character’s death here is executed excellently in a great Vietnam war raid sequence.
For me, Caan wins both films from his female co-star with his understated brilliance. It’s not entirely unusual for him to be around louder bigger female performances (most of which seems to get Oscar nominated). Infact, it’s a rather regular occurence. From Shirley Knight in The Rain People, Sally Kellerman in Slither, Marsha Mason in Cinderella Liberty, Kathy Bates in Misery to Barbra Streisand in Funny Lady and Bette Midler in For the Boys here. He is the one who keeps these films grounded and does the heavy lifting. The relationship he has with Midler’s son and his manager (played by George Segal) here in For the Boys is great.
I think Ryan O’ Neal is deserving of a mention for Barry Lyndon at least because of the scene with his dying child. O’Neal is not a great actor by any means (he is pretty damn terrible in something like A Bridge Too Far) but is very suited to the role here other than the accent at least. I think Redford was the other main candidate for the role (they share some scenes in the aforementioned A Bridge Too Far) and I don’t think Redford is suitable for this looser type role. This is not a bad performance from O’Neal (and some people seem to think that – so I read a review of The Duellists and it pretty much criticized O’Neal here and recommended either Keith Carradine or Keitel for this role) by a long shot.
Funny Lady (1975)
https://imgur.com/a/funny-lady-1975-gX5sw7z
What kind of grade do you put these “missed films” at?
@K- I have Funny Lady at a MS grade.
@Drake- Have you seen Joseph Losey’s The Romantic Englishwoman (1975)?
@Malith- I don’t believe so
@Drake- I think you will love it. It’s a very avant-garde, ambiguous type film. And very much a Joseph Losey film.
I have some problems with the Deep Red Remaster Version. One of the issues is the English audio track slipping into Italian in the longer version because the added scenes were not dubbed into English. But even more than that they washed the colours away to make it completely white instead of the white-greenish hue in the Remaster. There is a stark difference especially in the author killing scene.
Case in point.
https://imgur.com/a/MtgsxXd
The Romantic Englishwoman (1975)
https://imgur.com/a/X2vQOP3
I think The Romantic Englishwoman is such a great addition to Losey’s filmography because it tackles so many of the themes in Losey’s avant-garde filmography (along with The Servant, Secret Ceremony, Accident). The loneliness of the bourgeoisie, character dynamics within a confined space. And as always with Losey the interiors are so well decorated. There are mirrors all over the place here. Big bold colour splashes in parties (they are indicated as hell with the red colour here) and also repetition of this same scene with first Caine, then Berger with Glenda Jackson. And like Accident this film’s premise is all about whether Glenda Jackson will have/had sex with Helmut Berger. And the doubt of this is constantly in Caine’s mind as he imagines them cheating again and again.
I was a bit worried about how this will end as it isn’t the easiest premise to end well. But the twist ending with the neighbours taking over the household with their parties (this is a nod to The Servant) at night contrasting with the sunny disposition in France in the previous scene is superb as well. It’s a twist ending rather than the quite obvious happy ending with a premise like this.
Berger is superb here as well. Critics can go to hell calling him a “non-actor”. Over the top melodramatics and crying doesn’t make for compelling characters or is the greatest acting. (And Jackson and Caine does that a lot here which is suited for the film but still). Berger is such a compelling and intriguing actor. Here and in all the films he did with Visconti. And Berger walks away with the best performance here. Even though it’s more of a “mood” film than an “acting” film.
O’Neal is often a weak actor(he is terrible in A Bridge Too Far) for example but I feel like he fits this role here in Barry Lyndon like a glove. Weak, insecure, opportunist scoundrel. With some saving graces like the love for his child in a poignant moment. I’m not too sure this works with Robert Redford(O’Neal’s second in command in A Bridge Too Far). I think they were the final 2 choices. How about John Cassavetes?
@Lionel – What do you think about it? Have you reviewed it?
I think it’s an MP. One of the greatest Indian films ever made for sure. Quite different and amazing compared to usual Bollywood fare.
@Alex-No, I haven’t watched it. But I saw Sholay and Mother India (1957) ranked very highly in the TSPDT list. Apart from the Guru Dutt and Satyajit Ray films.
I have yet to catch Mother India yet but Sholay was amazing. If you can just understand how the narrative structure works and is broken according to Bollywood “Masala Film” tropes and move past it, you can see all the brilliant editing, direction, visual flair, cinematography, acting, songs and what not.
@Alex-Yeah. I need to see Sholay. I didn’t think much of RRR at all. I think there is an interesting Indian film released this year called All We Imagine As Light from Payal Kapadia. It currently has a 100 on RT with 84 reviews. Amazing. 93 on Metacritic.
RRR was a stupid movie. Sholay is leagues better. Where are you from though, Lionel?
@Drake-Have you seen the Indian Film Sholay (1975)? It was in the TSPDT top 1000 when I last checked it.
@Lionel- I have not been able to catch Sholay as of yet
@Drake-Are there any other films in the TSPDT Top 1000 list you are missing apart from Sholay?
@Drake – You should absolutely watch it. It’s been rapidly rising up TSPDT for the past 5-6 years. It was also named the Best Indian film of all time by the BFI so, I say it’s one you shouldn’t miss at all. You can check the top 10 Indian films on BFI and Film Companion’s sites to catch other great Indian masterpieces other than Ray and Dutt’s films. Also, Sholay is ranked #1 on both.
@Alex- Thank you for the recommendation
One of the shots included here(The one with the hanging lamp silhouette with the women) is different(and lesser) in the restored version of Deep Red. It’s completely white.
Have you revisited The Travelling Players recently? I saw half of it a while back. It was very good but i did not finish it. Need to do that.
Anything else from Theo that is in the archives. Anything great?
What is the best version of Deep Red? The 2 hr 6 min Italian version or the 1hr 45 min English language version? There is also another 2 hr 6 min English language version but the added scenes are in Italian.