- Terrence Malick’s Badlands announced the arrival of one of cinema’s greatest new voices in 1973. It is Malick’s true debut at thirty (30) years old.
- Badlands opens on an empty alley lined with garage in South Dakota. Malick moved quietly. This has a different, more poetic or lyrical vibe (though not half that of some of Malick’s later works) than Arthur Penn’s Bonnie and Clyde (just six years before in 1967) or the members of the Movie Brat or New Hollywood movements.
- This film and Scorsese’s Mean Streets debuted at the New York Film festival in 1973—yamma- what a festival!
- Malick casts Martin Sheen and Sissy Spacek as the lovers on the run. Both actors had appeared in films before, but this made their careers. Spacek is a Texan- and sneaky old (24 here in 1973) but believable as a 15-year-old. It is fascinating that Warren Oates (third fiddle in the ensemble) is easily the most recognizable name in the cast in 1973 (this is just a few years removed from 1969’s The Wild Bunch).

Sheen and Spacek are both dazzling. Sheen’s Kit is a James Dean look-alike. He has that tiny little frame, the jean jacket, the colossal hair. He’s both a heartthrob, and a charming sociopath. Spacek’s (playing Holly) distanced, often unsettling, voice-over is one of cinema’s finest. Even in the scene where she cries, she has that far-away look in her eyes.
- Badlands is not Mallick’s greatest work, but it may be the greatest screenplay he’s ever written. “Gifted writer” is not a compliment often associated with Malick. He’s better known for his photography but he’s also a Rhodes scholar, and graduated summa cum laude with a degree in philosophy from Harvard. Both Kit and Holly are hauntingly detached. The script is filled with intentional randomness. Spacek’s Holly will stop, mid thought, and say “I’ve got a headache”. She admits she “didn’t have a lot of personality” and after a seemingly big dramatic murder moment—Sheen’s Kit hits us with “…that’s the end of the message… I’ve run out of things to say”. Later Holly, via that sublime voice-over, admits “I didn’t feel shame or fear—just sort of-…blah”. This again sort of makes it the anti-Bonnie and Clyde with the Freudian and psychosexual reading of Penn’s and Beatty’s Clyde. Malick here, instead, is starting a long career of showing us the high perfection and beauty in nature (though there isn’t as much of it in his debut Badlands as some cinephiles remember)—and the low ugliness of humanity. Often in Badlands, Sheen’s kit reminds us of the fragility and cold randomness of life. Holly says “I grew to love the forest”. Often, throughout his body of work, Malick’s world is about the meeting of nature and violence.
- That wonderful music motif is from George Aliceson Tipton- I was shocked to find that he didn’t go on to have a really strong career in cinema—most of his work after this is in 1980’s sitcoms (with some catchy tunes).
- I mention it above, but Oates is the biggest star in the cast here in 1973- making his demise and early exit from the film play almost like a Psycho/Janet Leigh-like choice.

I’ve mentioned Tipton’s score, but the musical choices and curation throughout is as genius as anything from Scorsese in this era. You have Nat King Cole late in the film, Orloff’s “Musica Poetica” during the arson scene, and Mickey & Sylvia’s “Love is Strange” is one of the best 30 second stretches of cinema in the 1970’s. In fact, that scene–the dance with Sheen’s bobbing hair, white t-shirt and hands tucked into his back pocket while Spacek dances barefoot is cut waaaaaay too soon. That’s a special moment and you hold that for at least a full minute—if not let it play out for the entire song running time. Instead, Malick undercuts it a little (the transition isn’t amazing) to Sheen’s Kit struggling fishing in the next scene.
- Not a major flaw but there’s a weak little black and white sequence I always forget is in the film where Malick takes us out of Holly’s perspective to tell us about the impact of the duo on society.

One of the great frames in the film (and this is not one overly filled with them- especially when you think of Malick)- is at the composition of staggered bodies at the 58-minute mark in the rich man’s house. Spacek is in the background right by the window, the maid is in the background left, the rich man is in the center on the couch while the white furniture coverings give it a true painterly impression.
- Unlike almost everything from Malick after this film, Badlands has many moments of levity. When Kit steals the rich man’s Cadillac he says, “Don’t worry, I won’t let her drive”. He even wipes his fingerprints at his house (which is hilarious at that point in his crime spree) and I just about spit up my beverage when Spacek’s Holly tells us, via narration, that “he shot a football that he considered access baggage.” Haha.

The final half hour is where Malick lets free a little visually and we arrive at the title of the film.

Often, it is just these two lost souls, the splendid voice-over, the music, and the massive great plains.

At the 65-minute mark there is the frame of the moon with Sheen’s Kit—a great painting. A pink sky magic-hour horizon (Malick’s gift to cinema) is to follow.
- You’ll notice three cinematographers credited with the film—how absolutely brilliant and bold for a 30-year-old first time filmmaker, Malick, to be so insistent that he drives off not one, but two cinematographers to get exactly what he wanted.
- A must-see/masterpiece border film
– I love this film, for a while it was my favorite Malick film but it’s now fell to 3rd or 4th (less to
do with it and more to do with how much I’ve come to love Days of Heaven and The Thin Red
Line)
– I think you’re right on point in how Kit represents random destructiveness as there is no real
logic to who he kills, the couple he puts into the shed then shoots without looking and who
he spares, the wealthy man and his maid.
– I think Malick has a cameo
– It may not have as many beautiful shots as his other films, but some of the shots in the last
half hour are absolutely gorgeous
– Roger Ebert perfectly sums up this film (and really all Malick films): “Human lives diminish
beneath the overarching majesty of the world.” That quote is so good I wish I could call it my
own lol
– A lesser film and director would attempt to overly explain Kit and Holly’s behavior, perhaps
with flashbacks or a side plot. And frankly Holly seems just as much of a sociopath as Kit, she
doesn’t actually kill anyone but she clearly has zero remorse for anything.
– The scene with Kit recording random advice for younger generations is hilarious.
starting a Malick study myself
To add to my post above
– I think I didn’t realize the number of teenage clichés in the early part of the film, Holly
twirling her baton in the front yard, Kit and Holly making out underneath the bleachers,
but I think that’s the point
– The more times I watch the more frightening I find Sissy Spacek’s character, there is
something i so hauntingly empty and detached about the way she responds to Kit’s
murders that are almost more frightening than Kit
– They are headed to the “Badlands” of Montana but clearly, they are both searching for
something in their empty lives and are unable to satisfy it, there are moments like the
dancing scene when they appear quite content, but it is almost always followed by scenes
where they are both staring blankly looking bored until the next adventure
– I am not sure if Malick is the kind of director who is attempting to make a “statement” with
his films, but I wonder about the last 10 min or so when the officers are practically giddy
hanging out with Kit who clearly craves the attention while giving away his cigarettes and
other minor possessions, perhaps something to say about celebrity culture, there’s also a
scene with Holly quizzing Kit about celebrity facts. After Kit is arrested, one of the police
says he looks like James Dean and Kit smiles widely.
How do the rest of you feel about the ending to Badlands? Despite loving the film as a whole, I was rather disappointed by the closing minutes and felt they really threw off the tone. For the majority of the film there is an atmosphere which is at once playful/ whimsical in its romanticization of the couple, and cold and chilling in its visuals and soundtrack, as well as Spacek’s detached narration. It has an ambient miasma about it which is so potent and hypnotic and ineffable I may even say it’s worthy of comparison to such masterpieces of atmosphere as Aguirre, the Wrath of God or Persona. And yet the final scenes are completely bereft of this aura, and therefore the only part of the film I did not enjoy. I could see the argument that it feels like an unwelcome return to reality because it’s supposed to, and that it’s merely conveying that the world Kit and Holly were living in was illusory. However, I wish there was a way for Malick to convey that message without throwing off the tone of the film so much; perhaps the Butch Cassidy route, of making it clear that they were living in a state of delusional egotism, but wisely ending the film before showing the terrible consequences thereof.
@Max- Compelling–good work here.
@Max – The first paragraph of Roger Ebert’s Badlands review is one of the best paragraph’s he’s written:
“Holly describes her life as if she’s writing pulp fiction. “Little did I realize,” she tells us, “that what began in the alleys and back ways of this quiet town would end in the Badlands of Montana.” It is the wondering narrative voice that lingers beneath all of Terrence Malick’s films, sometimes unspoken: Human lives diminish beneath the overarching majesty of the world.”
That last sentence in particular is amazing and something that was clear to me from my Malick study. With nearly every other director in existence, nature is in the background. In Malick films nature is often the foreground with people in the background. Or to put another way with other directors they make films about people who happen to live in the natural world. Malick on the other hand makes films about the natural world which just happens to be populated by people. Obviously the Tree of Life is the ultimate example of this and serves as a culmination of the themes present throughout Malick’s filmography. Malick’s films make you realize how small and insignificant the human race is in the grand scheme of the Universe.
I am curious Max have you seen the rest of Malick’s work?
No, Badlands is the only one so far. I have OCD and I try to watch a director’s films in order (especially when it’s as auspicious a debut as this one) And I absolutely loved Badlands, to be perfectly clear; I actually vastly prefer it to Bonnie and Clyde, which many consider its companion piece. I just wish I could change the ending to something that fits the tone of the rest of the film.
@Max – I love Bonnie and Clyde (1967) but I like Badlands even more. Bonnie and Clyde is more purely entertaining, it has an incredible energy with the young criminals who are driven more by the thrill of bank robberies than the actual money itself.
Badlands is far more haunting though. The crimes can not written off as merely being a function of a terrible depression. You really do not know what motivates the young lovers in Badlands and thus it comes off as sheer nihilism.
And to add to what you said about the themes of nature and man’s insignificance, I think that is pertinent to the point I was making: my only complaint about Badlands is in the closing minutes where Malick pulls away from nature and focuses on established society, with the National Guard, and Kit’s celebrity status and everything. I think that is part of the reason why there is an inconsistency of tone. Of course, there’s nothing intrinsically wrong with alternating between tones, but I’m not a fan of keeping the same captivating tone throughout the entire film and then ditching it in the final minutes.
@Max – interesting points regarding the established society and national guard etc. I see your point though. One of my favorite scenes is when Kit and Holly are living in that forest area with makeshift tree house. It really shows their youth, I used to love climbing trees and making “forts” with friends as a kid. They are living out a fantasy throughout the film so I took the ending to be a smack of reality to the face. Their crimes were real and ruined the lives of many innocent people. But I completely understand your points regarding tone.
If you liked this film as you intricate I would strongly recommend Days of Heaven, many similarities but Days of Heaven is even better and is in my opinion one of the 30 greatest films ever and arguably the most beautiful.
You know it’s time to delete the autocorrect extension when you try to write “emanation” and it comes out as “miasma” Or maybe I’m just an incompetent typer.
To be perfectly clear, I do not believe that Badlands has a pestilent odor.