best film: Nostalghia from Andrei Tarkovsky
- The narrative isn’t easy—it’s up there with Mirror for being his most opaque
- Uncontestably stunning camera movements and achievements in décor and mise-en-scene that interrupt quiet and stillness (usually with water running somewhere and a German Shepard in the mix)
- A magnificent cinematic painting of an ending—truly one of cinema’s great images to close a film
- For Tarkovsky it is the first of two collaborations with longtime member of the Bergman trope of actors- Erland Jospehson
- Open in mist and fog—lovely opening shot. The car moves out of frame and then back in and Tarkovsky doesn’t chase- he slowing tracks in

one of the most beautiful films ever made
- Continues camera moving imperceptibly closer via tracking shot
- Gorgeous black and white flashbacks. It’s from MIrror. Audio of water trickling like every one of his films. Often you hear overlapping audio with muted contemporary dialogue over the flashback (which makes me think we’re talking about partial surrealism)
- There’s an odd bit of ego here with Tarkovsky’s work. In Mirror he had a poster of Solaris (if Spielberg did this, and he does— he’d get crushed for it, and he does). In Nostalghia, two characters talk about Tarkovsky’s father’s poetry with great reverence
- In almost every scene there is the use of mirrors and water/rain.

Still frame breathtaking photography all over the place
- Several “oners” or tracking shots. One is along a rustic Tuscan rock wall when introducing Josephson
- Tarkovsky loves shooting in open hallways with doors open and the wall at the end there is a painting or lighted piece of art. I can see Tarkovsky’s influence on Peter Greenaway with his framing, rigorously mirroring in his images and layered mise-en-scene
- Countless images of rusticated Tuscany region
- Josephson’s dilapidated house is a marvel of mise-en-scene
- I was continually impressed with the technical skill involved with the hiding of the camera in all the mirror work
- The domestic relationship in the film had some scenes of great acidly like that of a Bergman film
- The pond/lagoon/tidepool thing set piece is brilliant. It’s like right out of Solaris or Stalker. This and the house of Josephson are ridiculously well-done and the film just ramps up from there to the end. It’s a 2-hour film but the first 30-40 are the weakest
- A meditation on love, regret, and memory

the arrangement of characters to create sublime compositions- whether they are captured in medium shot…

… or long shot
- I laughed at loud at the Camby NYT review. He closes with “nothing happens” and while tearing the film apart in the review says “Mr. Tarkovsky, whose earlier films include ”Andrei Rublev,” ”Solaris” and ”Stalker,” may well be a film poet but he’s a film poet with a tiny vocabulary. The same, eventually- boring images keep recurring in film after film – shots of damp landscapes, marshes, hills in fog, and abandoned buildings with roofs that leak. The meaning of water in his films isn’t as interesting to me as the question of how his actors keep their feet reasonably dry.”
- The mirror has meaning in the narrative- there’s a duality between the Josephson character and Oleg Yankovskiy character
- Tracking shot lighter carrying shot prior to final image is wonderful as well. Very dramatic and stylistically loud. 9-minute tracking shot ending in a wonderful shot of the flame in hand
- The final mise-en-scene shot is utterly gob smacking.

The final mise-en-scene shot is utterly gob smacking.
most underrated: Rumble Fish from Francis Ford Coppola. The lack of appreciation for Coppola’s Rumble Fish is a mystery to me. It is a visual experiment from one of cinema’s great masters. The black and white photography is immaculate, the young cast is so talented, and Coppola meddles with atmosphere like he does in Apocalypse Now. The tracking shots may be the best of his career. The fact that the TSPDT consensus has still kept it out after all these years is amazing. Anyone who gives the film a negative review is a) wrong and b) focusing far too much on things like screenplay strength and narrative for me to approach or ever come to agreement with.

the scope may be smaller than the Vietnam War and somewhat adapting Conrad’s Heart of Darkness– but the cinematic inventiveness on display from Coppola serve as proof that he has not fallen off yet in Rumble Fish

racking the various lenses to get beautiful (and distorted) imagery

Rumble Fish is the middle film in Coppola’s “underrated trilogy” (my term). One From the Heart was in 1981, this in 1983 and The Cotton Club to come the following year. I’m not going to argue that these films compare with Coppola’s work in the 1970’s– but it is much closer than the consensus believes.

a visual explosion like this is superior to any well-acted, well-written, but otherwise cinematically quiet film (we get twenty to thirty films like the latter every year —- if we’re lucky we get maybe ten to twenty films a decade like Rumble Fish).
most overrated: Local Hero is a nice little film but shouldn’t land at the #625 slot on the all-time list like the consensus would have it.
- A unique and rich take on the comedy, the fish-out-of-water comedy
- If there are most than half the reviews mention how “charming” it is and it extremely charming. Affirming– filled with Forsyth’s splendid wit
- The Mark Knopfler guitar score is superb- the soundtrack was a huge success—Knopfler would do Princess Bride as well.
gems I want to spotlight: It isn’t top tier Mike Nichols or top tier Meryl Streep but Silkwood is a nice little thriller that not many people have seen. Star 80 is Bob Fosse’s last film. It is flawed- but has some high-highs (Fosse’s editing) and Eric Roberts is very good as playing the disturbing husband in this little inside-Hollywood, seedy true story (involving a thinly veiled character playing the Peter Bogdanovich). Lastly, Risky Business is a terrific film. Yes- it has the Tom Cruise in his underwear/Bob Segar iconic scene- but the direction is more than solid and I’ve always adored the Tangerine Dream pure-1980s musical score.
trends and notables:
- 1983 seems like a forgotten year with both of its masterpieces (one from Tarkovsky, one from Coppola) woefully underrated by the consensus. Again, Tarkovsky works so infrequently (1979 his last) that any year with a film of his is a special year (he only has one more left). And, 1983 is a pairing up of the same auteurs at the top from 1979 with Stalker and Apocalypse Now. Coppola, since coming onto the scene in 1972, would direct six (6) top five (5) of year films in eleven (11) years. That is simply outstanding.
- Still, 1983 can’t quite measure up to 1982 (which feels like a once in a decade-type year). Even if 1983 is strong at the top, films like Zelig, Risky Business, A Christmas Story and The Big Chill should be somewhere between 11-20 on a year-end best of list—and for 1983— they all land on the top 10.
- From an auteur standpoint- Mike Leigh gets his first archiveable film in 1983 with Meantime. Leigh would help promote the talents of many of the greatest acting talents from the UK during this era- both Gary Oldman and Tim Roth are a part of that here.
- 1983 would also be the first year with an archiveable film for Ed Harris (The Right Stuff and Under Fire) Michelle Pfeiffer (Scarface) and Kim Basinger (what a year for blondes- Never Say Never Again).
- I’m not just writing this because of Tarkovsky’s film from 1983—but you’ll see a big nostalghia boom in 1980s cinema. It does feel like just about every decade reacts to the decade (or decades) before it and in the 1980s you see a wave of throw back films to the “good, ol’ days”- here in 1983 it is represented in The Right Stuff, A Christmas Story, and The Big Chill.

a spectacular capture here with the sunsetting, the silhouettes in the foreground and the flyover above– from The Right Stuff
- With Scarface, Brian De Palma continues his hot street. This would be his third top 10 film of the decade so far already

Tony Montata (Al Pacino) in a perfect composition here from De Palma’s Scarface.

It is often paired with 1984’s This Is Spinal Tap from Rob Reiner but Woody Allen’s Zelig here in 1983 gets some credit for starting/restarting the mockumentary subgenre. Without a doubt, Luis Bunuel had been here before (1933- Las Hurdes) but still.
best performance male: James Woods gives the best performance of the year as Max Renn – David Cronenberg’s TV producer with some body horror morphing issues. Al Pacino swings for a home run and hits a….stand-up double in Scarface as Tony Montana. It is a memorable character. It is a big, loud, over-the-top performance but with a director like De Palma and a writer like Oliver Stone I don’t think it would fit for Pacino to go pensive and coy. Undoubtedly, Pacino turned a corner around And Justice For All 1979—loud and brash—different from the bulk of his work in the 1970’s up to that point. Mickey Rourke lands here for really his combined work in Rumble Fish (1983), Diner (1982) and his scene-stealing in Body Heat (1981). Rourke is this rare breed of sensitivity and masculinity (these are the reasons for the Brando comparisons in the early 1980s) that does not happen often. The last mention in 1983 here is for Sam Shepard in The Right Stuff. There is no lead actor in The Right Stuff– it is an ensemble piece and the there are a dozen excellent actors in it- but Shepard is almost separate from the rest of the film. He does give the best single performance and the opening 25-minute prologue on the breaking of the sound barrier is its own little marvelous short film.

With De Palma, Pacino, and Oliver Stone (screenplay) this is a match made in heaven in terms of three artists who aren’t afraid to go for excess
best performance female: Sumiko Sakamoto is the only actor represented here in 1983 for her work in Imamura’s The Ballad of Narayama.
top 10
- Nostalghia
- Rumble Fish
- Videodrome
- Scarface
- The Ballad of Narayama
- The Right Stuff
- Zelig
- The Big Chill
- Risky Business
- A Christmas Story

Videodrome– unquestionably David Cronenberg’s finest work to date in 1983

yet another from Philp Kaufman’s The Right Stuff. This was shot by the great cinematographer Caleb Deschanel. This here is echoing Ford’s The Searchers
Archives, Directors, and Grades
A Christmas Story – Clark | R/HR |
A Love in Germany- Wajda | |
And the Ship Sails On- Fellini | R |
Baby It’s You – Sayles | R |
Danton- Wajda | R |
El Sur – Erice | R |
First Name: Carmen – Godard | R |
Heat and Dust – Ivory | R |
In the White City – Tanner | |
L’Argent- Bresson | |
Life Is a Bed of Roses – Resnais | R |
Local Hero – Forsyth | R |
Meantime – Leigh | R |
Merry Christmas, Mr. Lawrence- Oshima | R |
Never Cry Wolf- Ballard | R |
Never Say Never Again – Kershner | R |
Nostalghia – Tarkovsky | MP |
Pauline at the Beach- Rohmer | R |
Return of the Jedi – Marquand | R |
Risky Business – Brickman | R/HR |
Rumble Fish- F. Coppola | MP |
Scarface- De Palma | MS |
Silkwood- M. Nichols | R |
Star 80- Fosse, | R |
Suburbia – Spheeris | R |
Sudden Impact – Eastwood | R |
Tender Mercies- Beresford | |
Terms of Endearment- J. Brooks | |
The Ballad of Narayama- Imamura | HR/MS |
The Big Chill- Kasdan | HR |
The Dead Zone – Cronenberg | R |
The Dresser – Yates | R |
The Hunger- T. Scott | R |
The Meaning of Life – Gilliam, T. Jones | R |
The Right Stuff – P. Kaufman | HR |
Trading Places – Landis | R |
Under Fire- Spottiswoode | R |
Videodrome- Cronenberg | MS |
WarGames – Badham | R |
Zelig – Allen | HR |
*MP is Masterpiece- top 1-3 quality of the year film
MS is Must-See- top 5-6 quality of the year film
HR is Highly Recommend- top 10 quality of the year film
R is Recommend- outside the top 10 of the year quality film but still in the archives
If doing 1983 again today would Nostalgia be your number 1 ahead of Rumble Fish?
@Joel- It would be for sure- I’m only at 1944 right now so I have a ways to go but I am updating my year by year archives as we speak so this will be remedied soon
Yes I have been keeping up to date with the updates of the pages. I was just curious as I was doing some stats as to which director has the most ‘best films of the year’. I know I should probably wait until you finish updating all of the years but I didn’t so I only changed 2 years that I knew for sure you’ve changed your perspective on. 1983 Nostalgia over Rumble Fish and 2000 In the mood for love over Werkmeister Harmonies.
I was surprised to see that Paul Thomas Anderson has had 5 films that you consider the best of the year and no other director even has 4. Do you think that in the future if PTA continues to make films at the highest quality he could continue to push up the rankings into the top 5 and possibly even top 3 or the GOAT?
@Joel- thanks for the comment. I believe there are more than 2 changed years. I was aa little surprised to see that PTA had five best year of the films and no other director had four either. I absolutely think if PTA continues this type of work he could be considered a top 5, 3 or GOAT. I’m pretty sure the next time I update my top 500 he’ll have five top 100 films (or very close) and that puts him in rarefied air. When I last did my top 500 only Kubrick had five in the top 100.
I must confess that the statistic bothers me a bit, the fact that Anderson has the same number of top 100 movies as Tarkovsky and Kurosawa combined makes me wonder if you should put it in front of them.
Is any Anderson movie except There Will Be Blood really better than Ikiru and Andrei Rublev?
The fact that Anderson has 4 while they have 2 each, makes me wonder if Anderson already surpassed the masters.
@Aldo- you are right. I don’t think that I’m right person to answer (i’ll always pick formal picturesque achievement over crazy camera movements) but i think I’ll always have Ikiru and Andrei Rublev above magnolia or boogie Nights.
Franky I may only have the master and TWBB of PTA in my top 100.
When I think about it, @Drake’s lists are comparative, like if a movie is top 10 of the decade it’ll be in consideration to be in top 100 or 150 and (don’t hate me for saying it) quality of cinema has declined, foreign cinema is not as strong as it once was. So if I said that the master was #1 of the dacade you’ll agree with me as it’s a major movie but one of the reasons it’ll be that high (apart from it’s quality) will be lack of competition (there are only 3 films in consideration roma, tree of life & master if someone said la la Land’s #1 of decade I’ll deny to believe).
@Joel – I know this is an older post but noticed it checking out the updated 1983 page, it seems definite that PTA will enter the top 10 eventually… and top 5 is certainly possible as well.
However, I am not sure the # of best films of the year should be viewed as an essential stat only because there would seem to be a lot of luck involved. For example, Tarkovsky’s Stalker would in almost any year be #1…it just had the misfortune of coming out the same year as Apocalypse Now. Rear Window would have been the best film in many years but happened to come out the same year as Seven Samurai, then there is Breathless in 1960. The opposite is true as well, there are years where the best film is only the best film because it happened to come out in a weak year like Full Metal Jacket in 1987.
@James Trapp I can definitely agree with that statement. I agree there is a lot of luck involved in being the best film of the year and you make some great examples of it. I’d say a decline in the overall quality of cinema in the previous 2 decades has contributed to PTA having 5 films as the best in their respective year. I was merely making an observation that it’s crazy to think that PTA already has 5 and he’s only halfway through his career. Probably a good chance to make it 6 this year too as it’s looking like another weak year in cinema – only thing I’ve seen so far that’s a HR or higher is The Underground Railroad.
Speaking of his upcoming film, I don’t get excited for any other movies as much as I do for PTA’s films and probably Nolan’s. Curious to know some of the directors that people on this site get most excited for. I would also add Chazelle to that list of director’s works that I most anticipate.
Since we talked about Rumble Fish, i just saw it for the first time a few days ago and wow!
A somewhat strange movie, i’m not sure I’ve seen something like it, similar yes, same, no.
I needed a few days to process what i have seen, you could easily say it’s better than the conversation.
The movie hits you with pretty strange angles, it’s pretty expressionist, there is smoke coming from everywhere in any place, it looks like Blade Runner, i’m not sure, but it reminds me a lot of the noirs. What to say about the fish scene, wow.
It is definitely no better than Nostalghia, but better than anything in 1983.
Drake what did you think of the performances? particularly of Dillon as Rusty James, i’m not sure if it’s a good or bad act, his voice seemed too exaggerated
I am surprised Coppola’s Outsiders isn’t in the archives. I remember it very fondly from middle school when he read the novel and saw the film. We all really enjoyed it. I don’t think anyone will call swayze a great actor but he was exceptional as darry, ponyboy’s oldest brother. Also the two main characters and matt dillon as dallas winston. i remember especially the montage of the robert frost poem with the sunset was beautiful. i guess despite obvious influences like rebel without a cause and references to gone with the wind it can be compared to howard hawks for its showing of male bonding and the extent of such friendships, as well as a man’s relationship to a female. i suppose the film is a bit cliche and predictable but i’d say the emotional moments are earned. coppola is a master filmmaker because of things like apocalypse now and godfather, but i really admire how his early films were so great that he was allowed to experiment with ‘lesser’ ideas. that is how i want if i ever become a filmmaker (which is many a cinephile’s dream)
what are your thoughts drake. i think outsiders is superior to christmas story and it may be top 10 of the year for me.
@D.W. Griffith. I haven’t seen The Outsiders in 20 years and I don’t remember being that impressed. I hope I’m wrong. Certainly willing to check out anything by FF Coppola again.
i watched rumble fish because of you and fully agree its the best of 1983 (although apparently you dont think its the best of 83 anymore?) never seen anything like it before. the outsiders should be on the archives though, it is one of the best of 1983, i found it better than risky business.
@dylan- happy to hear you thought highly of Rumble Fish- thanks for sharing
is there any other movies that look like it? you know, with the smoke and stuff, or is it one of a kind? i assume coppola never made another movie like it?
Good question. I don’t believe there is another film that looks quite like Rumble Fish. One I might bring up is The Third Man, which utilizes odd camera angles and urban shadows brilliantly, as well perhaps a bit of “the smoke and stuff” that you mention from Rumble Fish. Some other filmmakers I might mention with superb use of camera angles like Rumble Fish include Gilliam, Spike Lee, Welles, Malick in some cases, and Dreyer. However, I’ll admit that I don’t believe their movies take advantage of low angles, high angles, and such even half enough. If I ever become a filmmaker, I’ll simply go crazy with the angles. The smoky look of Rumble Fish has been achieved in Ridley Scott’s movies, especially Blade Runner, and some other noirs and neo-noirs. The flashes of color among a black and white atmosphere has been done as well in Schindler’s List, which has a smoky look in some sections, and High and Low. However, there is no movie that includes all of these elements as thoroughly as Rumble Fish.
I should also mention that Coppola’s other movies are somewhat like this, especially Apocalypse Now. There is even more smoke there than in Rumble Fish. However, none use the decaying urban atmosphere and camera angles as well as it does.
@Dylan and @Graham– Graham has done a great job here so I’ll leave it there- he grabbed all the films I was going to mention including Apocalypse Now- on the Apocalypse Now page I saw “Coppola’s use of smoke as a visual device stuck out to me– so much dry ice/smoke is used in this movie. The colored usage during the Wagner score attack and used by the emcee after the playboy bunnies dance. Atmospheric for sure. It seems like it’s the rare scene/set piece where it isn’t used.”
Even though Return of the Jedi has a page. It isn’t hyperlinked.
@Malith- thank you, fixed now
No more Cruise in the acting category but Rourke so… cool.
I caught Videodrome a second time after my minor Lynch study at the end of June and it confirmed Videodrome as a MP in my eyes even if it visually (and thus the entire package) is not as strong as Crash or Dead Ringers, or even like Naked Lunch which I actually think is a slightly weaker film than Videodrome. I think it’ll land around #190 or so on my list and that Debbie Harry is also worthy of a mention in the female performances list for her work on a per-minute basis.
I also caught Bresson’s L’Argent a week or two later and would probably place it around the same spot all-time (like #191) , I think it’s one of two masterpieces from Bresson, the other, superior one being Pickpocket and I’m pretty close to a MS/MP on Diary of a Country Priest (I will give A Man Escaped a second chance at some point… it is an excellent film but after one viewing I was tremendously let down by it visually… no offense to your opinion but I can’t understand how you call films like Ugetsu or Journey to Italy overrated (and they are, at least after one viewing) but not A Man Escaped).
Have you seen any of Maurice Pialat’s films? To our loves (1983) is ranked under top 500 on tspdt.
@M*A*S*H- Not yet- this is one of my blind spots. Three films for Pialat in the TSPDT top 1000.
I was about to ask that too. I just watched it today quite good. I don’t love it, but it’s very interesting. Whoever that lead actress is gives a terrific performance. I feel like judging Drakes tastes (obviously I could be wrong) I feel like he would have it as a highly recommend. It’s not really a stylistic film and the acting and script really carry it. I do recommend it though.
@Malith- thank you for the fix here
Didn’t Francis Ford Coppola’s The Outsiders(1983) made the archives?
@Lionel- It did, I was able to revisit The Outsiders fairly recently
Ah thanks. So will the Outsiders be included when you update this 1983 page in the future?
@Lionel- Yes – and on the Coppola page before that