- Terrence Malick’s The Tree of Life makes otherwise beautiful films, seem unbeautiful by comparison.
- The Tree of Life opens with Sean Penn’s character Jack (character names are meaningless here and hardly, if ever, referenced – so I will be using the actor’s name here for the most part) praying/talking to his brother. The angelic Jessica Chastain (2011 was her big coming out party- Jeff Nichols’ Take Shelter is the same year) takes the reins of the voice-over (before passing it to others) early, as, through her, Malick explains the duality that he has meditating on his entire five film and nearly forty-year career: grace and nature. Grace here is embodied in Chastain’s character. Pitt’s character is nature. They are the parents of three boys (Penn’s Jack character is the grown-up version of the eldest of the three) and Jack’s soul is the one that has a sort of Faustian battle between grace and nature—sort of goodness vs. harsh pragmatism.
- There is a medley of immaculate images that follow (this is really how you could describe the entire film).

Malick uses these low angle shots through trees (a staple in his repertoire) usually with the sun poking through.

This is juxtaposed with a low angle shot of skyscrapers– it is quite easy to guess which of these two worlds Malick prefers

A sublime low angle shot up through the swirling stained-glass windows of a church arrives soon after.

As a formal marker, like the pink/blue dye experimental watercolor splashes in PTA’s Punch-Drunk Love, Malick uses these sort of embryonic flares four times throughout the film including the final shot- a brilliant part of the montage.
- Whether it was found or designed by Jack Fisk (Malick’s go-to production designer), the location and home used in Texas is perfect.
- After Malick sets the scene in the opening with his flickering, mosaic style, the cosmos are invoked. This bold formal interlude lasts roughly fifteen minutes from the 20-minute mark to the 35-36-minute mark. Because of the death of one of the brothers, this family are asking questions to the heavens. One is doubt- sort of C.S. Lewis’ “The Problem of Pain”- the scripture from the book of Job opens the film- what follows from there is the pictorial story of creation. It is awesome- both muscular and poetic. It is in this sequence that Malick employs the talents of Douglas Trumbull.

Apparently Malick was dissatisfied with the computer-generated options. This section, the visual and narrative ambition involved, is one reason that so many cinephiles recall Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey when discussing to The Tree of Life. Trumbull last worked on Blade Runner in 1982.
- Malick highlights the juxtaposition of grace and nature throughout. During one sequence there is the calm of the streams and the trees, but Malick is always quick to contrast that with a violent explosion- like one dinosaur stepping on the neck of another. “Father, Mother, always you wrestle inside me. Always you will.”
- Malick’s style is this Eisenstein-like low average shot length (ASL). This not an auteur employing an occasional cutaway. The music (operas, church choirs) is extremely important to the impressionistic visuals, as is the poetic musings of the voice-over. But there are no more than a few scenes where two characters exchange dialogue. There are arguments at the family dinner table, talks about loss (one with Fiona Shaw talking to Chastain I recall) but these are glimpses…. there is no shot, reverse-shot dialogue.
- The Tree of Life is always religious work—the young Jack is playing with two alligators on Noah’s ark. Chastain’s character literally levitates at the 54-minute mark.
- This is feather in the cap for the resumes of both Brad Pitt and Jessica Chastain as Malick’s camera eavesdrops through open doors, open windows, and down their purposefully typical street. Pitt is the stern father, Chastain is the forgiving and warm mother. Pitt hardens his jaw in a way I have never seen in his work before or since. This is largely a silent movie-like non-verbal performance – all posture, posing, facial expressions and physical acting. They have three boys, they go to church, play ( all of Malick’s works just about have many scenes of frivolity), they eat meatloaf. Much of this is improvised- like the scene of the butterfly landing on Chastain. All of this is captured in Emmanuel Lubezki’s constantly moving camera with Malick’s trademark magic hour natural lighting often present setting the glow for the photography. There is a sort of chapter on innocence where Jack is in this beautiful Eden-like bubble. But soon, Malick cuts to a criminal being taking away in their small town. They cut to Pitt saying his mother is naïve, a young boy drowns, there is a boy who is a burn victim. The town sprays a fog of DDT on young boys in the street. Jack steals a negligee and floats it down the river to wash his hands clean of the sin. He shoots a BB gun at the brother who looks like Brad Pitt (great casting- as is the casting of the young Jack played by Hunter McCracken– he looks like Sean Penn) and is a talented musician (Pitt plays a failed musician) and is clearly the father’s favorite.

This Jack character, without much dialogue, is as complex as the Mason character in Richard Linklater’s splendid Boyhood (2014).
- The photography in The Tree of Life belongs in an art institute somewhere. Though I think it’s a myth that this is vastly superior to his previous films, or 2005’s The New World. There is the sun pouring through the laundry.

Malick goes to the doorway shot often to create a frame within his camera frame. Once there is Chastain lounging peaceably (here), once the Pitt-lookalike son is playing guitar, another time Pitt is coming home from work framed by the door.
- Penn resurfaces after he’s been gone for two hours. Emmanuel Lubezki claims there is an entire movie about him to be made from what has been left on floor in the editing room. So here, it seems like Penn is the victim of Malick’s editing style (as Adrien Brody was in The Thin Red Line). Malick actually employs five editors here.

During the sort of prologue, Penn’s Jack is on the beach in what appears to be an afterlife. Past and present embrace, mostly during the magic hour (though this shot is not) with operatic vocalizing accompanying them.

The notably breathtaking sequence of the salt beach at the 130-minute mark with the camera tracking behind Chastain as she blots out the sun

in all but a handful of films ever created, this would easily be the standout image

Score one for Cannes over the Academy- this won the Palme D’Or in 2011.
- “The only other film I’ve seen with this boldness of vision is Kubrick’s “2001: A Space Odyssey,” and it lacked Malick’s fierce evocation of human feeling.” – Ebert https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-tree-of-life-2011
- Given the legendary long-gestation period between films (this one is six years after 2005’s The New World) and with the knowledge of what would follow, you almost wish Malick had just skipped To the Wonder, Knight of Cups, and Song to Song and just spent eight years making A Hidden Life.
- An undisputable masterpiece
THE 20 BEST DIRECTORS
1. Nolan
2. Villeneuve
3. Pawlikowski
4. Scorsese
5. McQueen
6. Inarritu
7. Cuaron
8. W. Anderson
9. Tarantino
10. PTA
11. Refn
12. Malick
13. Lanthimos
14. Fincher
15. Chazelle
16. Coen
17. Gray
18. Aster
19. Andersson
20. Linklater
THE 20 BEST PERFORMERS
1. Phoenix
2. Gosling
3. DiCaprio
4. Adams
5. Fassbender
6. Stone
7. Hawke
8. Cotillard
9. Isaac
10. Bale
11. DDL
12. Dafoe
13. Rylance
14. Portman
15. Oldman
16. Johansson
17. Pitt
18. Pattinson
19. Gyllenhaal
20. McConaughey
@RujK – great work as usual. Scorsese as 4th best director of the decade…in his 5th decade of filmmaking! I am not counting the 60s even though his debut was then
I feel like Malick had a strange decade. He made the best film of the decade in my opinion as well then rattled off 3 mediocre films (I have not seen Song to Song so going off reputation) before a strong return to form with A Hidden Life (2019). I think your ranking at # 12 is fair
@James- Scorsese truly is unbelievable. He has been in the top of all the decades he has worked in except for 60s and in the 2000s he is “only” in the top 12.
For Malick; I only judge by what I have seen. And from him in 10s I have seen only The Tree of Life, Knight of Cups and Hidden Life, which is an incredibly strange bunch indeed (but not actually that sui generis- Scott with Blade Runner also comes to mind). Song to Song and his documentaries will have to wait.
TOP 50 BEST FILM PERFORMANCES
1. Joaquin Phoenix (The Master)
2. Kyle MacLachlan (Twin Peaks: The Return)
3. Natalie Portman (Black Swan)
4. Mark Rylance (Wolf Hall)
5. Michael Keaton (Birdman)
6. Oscar Isaac (Inside Llewyn Davis)
7. Philip Seymour Hoffman (The Master)
8. Ralph Fiennes (The Grand Budapest Hotel)
9. Kirsten Dunst (Melancholia)
10. Charlize Theron (Mad Max: Fury Road)
11. Ethan Hawke (First Reformed)
12. Leonardo DiCaprio (The Wolf of Wall Street)
13. Jesse Eisenberg (The Social Network)
14. Gary Oldman (Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy)
15. Michael Fassbender (Shame)
16. Leonardo DiCaprio (The Revenant)
17. Jake Gyllenhaal (Nightcrawler)
18. Florence Pugh (Midsommar)
19. Joanna Kulig (Cold War)
20. Willem Dafoe (The Lighthouse)
21. Emma Stone (La La Land)
22. Ryan Gosling (La La Land)
23. Adam Driver (Marriage Story)
24. Benedict Cumberbatch (Patrick Melrose)
25. Daniel Day-Lewis (Phantom Thread)
26. James McAvoy (Filth)
27. Choi Min-sik (I Saw the Devil)
28. Robert Pattinson (The Lighthouse)
29. Ryan Gosling (Blade Runner 2049)
30. Scarlett Johansson (Marriage Story)
31. Olivia Colman (The Favourite)
32. Joe Pesci (The Irishman)
33. Daniel Day-Lewis (Lincoln)
34.Toni Collette (Hereditary)
35. Brad Pitt (Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood)
36. Juliette Binoche (Certified Copy)
37. Ryan Gosling (Drive)
38. Denis Lavant (Holy Motors)
39. J.K. Simmons (Whipalsh)
40. Toni Servillo (The Great Beauty)
41. Jeremy Irons (Watchmen)
42. Tom Hardy (The Revenant)
43. Leonardo DiCaprio (Once Upon a Time..in Hollywood)
44. Joaquin Phoenix (Joker)
45. Rosamund Pike (Gone Girl)
46. Al Pacino (The Irishman)
47. Adam Sandler (Uncut Gems)
48. Amy Adams (Sharp Objects)
49. Steven Yeun (Burning)
50. Timothee Chalamet (Call Me by Your Name)
These are some amazing lists, RujK. Love seeing MacLachlan at #2. I feel like his performance is quite underrated by the general audience. I think in my list of performances, I’d have Rosmaund Pike in the top 5 and also Amy Adam’s in Arrival and Natalie Portman in Jackie in the top 15.
@Alex- yeah, I was just so impressed by MacLachlan’s chameleonic abilities I almost gave him the number one spot. Adams in Arrival and Portman in Jackie are the 72nd and 98th place respectfully. However, you must take into the account that this is one of the greatest decades for acting that I can think of, and performances in the top 100 would probably be in the top 50 of almost any other decade.
These are the results of my 2010s study.
TOP 100 FILMS
1. The Tree of Life MP
2. Roma MP
3. Dunkirk MP
4. The Turin Horse MP
5. The Master MP
6. Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) MP
7. Inception MP
8. The Social Network MP
9. The Revenant MP
10. The Grand Budapest Hotel MP
11. Mad Max: Fury Road MP
12. Melancholia MP
13. Mysteries of Lisbon MP
14. Midsommar MP
15. Cold War MP
16. Vitalina Varela MP
17. Twin Peaks: The Return MP
18. La La Land MP
19. Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood MP
20. Ida MP
21. Inside Llewyn Davis MP
22. Shame MP
23. About Endlessness MP
24. Parasite MP
25. The Favourite MP
26. Black Swan MP
27. The Irishman MP
28. Blade Runner 2049 MP
29. First Reformed MP
30. Moonrise Kingdom MP
31. Moonlight MP
32. Gravity MS/MP
33. Burning MS/MP
34. Columbus MS/MP
35. 1917 MS/MP
36. Waves MS/MP
37. Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives MS/MP
38. Django Unchained MS/MP
39. The Handmaiden MS/MP
40. The Great Beauty MS
41. Ad Astra MS
42. Call Me by Your Name MS
43. A Hidden Life MS
44. A Pigeon Sat on a Branch Reflecting on Existence MS
45. Paterson MS
46. Mr. Turner MS
47. Whiplash MS
48. Enemy MS
49. Laurence Anyways MS
50. Gone Girl MS
51. Son of Saul MS
52. The Deep Blue Sea MS
53. Drive MS
54. Little Women MS
55. Phantom Thread MS
56. Mommy MS
57. 12 Years a Slave MS
58. The King’s Speech MS
59. Only God Forgives MS
60. Under the Skin MS
61. The Painted Bird MS
62. Marriage Story MS
63. Certified Copy MS
64. Hereditary MS
65. Beanpole MS
66. Sunset MS
67. Boyhood MS
68. Holy Motors MS
69. The Ghost Writer MS
70. The Dark Knight Rises MS
71. The Lighthouse MS
72. Good Time MS
73. The Grandmaster MS
74. Widows MS
75. The Shape of Water MS
76. Blue Valentine MS
77. Lincoln MS
78. Carol MS
79. Before Midnight MS
80. We Need to Talk About Kevin MS
81. Patrick Melrose MS
82. Pain and Glory MS
83. Uncut Gems MS
84. Sicario MS
85. Spring Breakers HR/MS
86. The Neon Demons HR/MS
87. A Separation HR/MS
88. The Assistant HR/MS
89. Sunset Song HR/MS
90. Jackie HR/MS
91. The Assassin HR/MS
92. Interstellar HR/MS
93. Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse HR/MS
94. Victoria HR/MS
95. Swallow HR/MS
96. The Immigrant HR/MS
97. American Hustle HR/MS
98. The Woman in the Fifth HR/MS
99. Snowpiercer HR/MS
100. Joker HR/MS
@RujK- Love this- Patrick Melrose, huh? The one I haven’t seen. Good huh?
@Drake – not too surprising since Edward Berger is turning out to be a real force behind the camera.
@Harry – Very true- All Quiet on the Western Front
@Drake- it is quite an achievement. Maybe I am a bit generous, but I would be really surprised if you thought it was less than HR.
The colors, the flashback structure, the acting and writing of course + from the stills of All Quiet and Conclave I can see the visual resemblances between the works, so I’m very excited to see Berger’s other works and his future.
@RujK- I’m excited for it!
@Drake- This is a kind of compilation from my notes on it:
“Almost like Trainspotting for five hours, both in the content and the style (for style at least in the first episode). The series is composed out of five distinct episodes, each reflecting on a different stage in Patrick’s life, showcasing his psychological evolution. The fragmented narrative structure mirrors the fractured nature of Patrick’s mind, drawing from his past traumas and present struggles in a non-linear fashion – Berger reinforces this with casual jump-cuts and match-cuts from past to present and vice versa – a “memory” structure.
The camera adopts a very subjective perspective, especially in the first episode during Patrick’s drug-fueled hallucinations and visual distortions – wide-angle lenses, disorienting close-ups, negative space, rapid editing – to immerse the audience in his disjointed mental state, blending reality and his perception of it. The color palette also shifts dramatically depending on Patrick’s emotional and psychological condition. Bright saturated colors dominate his childhood and his happier present moments, while the more muted, shadowy tones reflect his somber, mostly present, moments – a striking emotional contrast between his highs and lows. Similarly Berger contrasts the expressive sets from the opulent estate in the south of France to the grimy, blue-ish London flats – the grandeur of his family vacation estate feels suffocating (oppressive childhood), while the chaotic, cramped spaces during his addiction reflect his spiraling, though eventually liberating, mental journey. A wonderful example of mise-en-scene as an extension of the character.
The cast is great all around, but Cumberbatch gives the best male performance of 2018. He delivers a tour-de-force across the multiple episodes, each one revealing a different mask over his tormented soul. In the first episode he is a frenetic whirlwind, navigating the chaos of addiction with a manic energy, balancing grim humor with harrowing self-destruction. His charm is razor-thin, revealing deep scars of trauma when his bravado slips. By the third episode, Cumberbatch calms down a bit, transforming Patrick into a haunted, sober observer. The mania is gone, replaced by quiet, introspective pain – his eventual breakdown is devastating, a man desperately trying to hold the weight of his past battles together. As we reach the final episodes, he is unraveling yet again, this time with a quieter agony. His shifts are subtle, but precise, masterfully portraying his internal collapse and tentative, imperfect attempts at redemption, making the performance a dynamic study of a person’s absolute brokenness.”
A rewatch of Tree of Life was my first film of 2023, felt even more spellbinding this time. Beyond the obvious photographic marvels and supremely ambitious ideas, the film wields the powerful tool of the montage in so many great ways. It sunk in a bit more this time just how perfectly paced and entrancing everything was. I don’t necessarily agree with the people you see around who claim that this is an “entirely new type of film” or anything like that, but rather I believe it just pulls everything off with such grace and attention to detail and that’s what makes it special. Truly a spellbinding watch and a great way to kick off the calendar year.
@ga – Wow- you can write- “beyond the obvious photographic marvels and supremely ambitious ideas, the film wields the powerful tool of the montage in so many great ways.” – Really well said.
Has anyone seen the 188 min extended cut? Link below
I just watched this film again yesterday, with my sister and her boyfriend, both were impressed. I have it on Criterion Blue Ray and noticed that there is a 2nd disc which is the extended cut. I have not checked out yet but I’m planning on it sometime, curious if anyone else has watched?
https://www.indiewire.com/2018/08/criterion-tree-of-life-terrence-malick-new-movie-1201999468/
@James Trapp- I have not as of yet
@Drake – until a couple days ago I was not even aware of it’s existence. I initially assumed the 2nd disc was special features.
[…] The Tree of Life – Malick […]
« Poor boy… Poor boy »
The best movie of the decade, top 50-30 of all time for me. Pitt’s character reminds me of my father.
This one took a 3 viewings to really sink in, I posted on the Malick page that “I had trouble the first 2 times with the back and forth between the birth of the universe and the O’Brien Family. I respected the idea of juxtaposing the story of the entire Universe with something as infinitesimal as one random family in Texas and found in brilliant from the 1st viewing. But it was not until this most recent viewing where I found myself completely engaged in every aspect of the film and it was magnificent.”
For anyone who has only viewed this film only once and had trouble I would definitely recommend sticking with it. Like 2001, there is so much to digest here that multiple viewings are absolutely necessary, I don’t care how intelligent and/or film knowledgeable you are there is no way to absorb everything with one viewing.
Interesting and maybe not all that surprising that Malick has a bachelor’s and master’s in philosophy; the bachelor’s from Harvard and the master’s degree from Oxford, 2 pretty good schools! Who said a philosophy degree is useless? ha
Will A Hidden Life be flying up in the rankings with your recent revisit?
I love how this is a post about one of THE greatest films and all I can do is talk about his next one.
@Zane- I wouldn’t say flying up the rankings