best film: La La Land from Damien Chazelle
2016 was struggling a little until La La Land came along (debuted at Venice). Chazelle’s Whiplash is brilliant- but it was impossible to see this stylistic sonic boom coming.
- Peter Travers said it best- Chazelle’s La La Land has a “passion for cinema that radiates every frame”. https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-reviews/la-la-land-review-magical-modern-day-musical-will-sweep-you-off-your-feet-106357/ This is a major achievement- Chazelle is throwing fastballs here and nothing fails to land.
- There are hints of Jacques Demy with the primary colors and the genre.
- There are also elements of I Am Cuba (or Paul Thomas Anderson’s Boogie Nights) with the camera tracking through the party and going into the pool- a stunning sequence and shot.
- Gloriously shot in CinemaScope

The opening shot, the traffic jam—the tracking shot that also introduces the two characters. This is a highly ambitious long take with camera movements, choreography, humor.
- Very intentional in the believable color design in the mise-en-scene- green straws at the coffee shop where Emma Stone’s character works. Blue parka she wears, yellow umbrellas, purple trash cans outside her apartment, red light in the corner of their bed.
- Whip pans galore
- The song- “Someone in the Crowd”- the camera is flying through their house in perfect rhythm. This is Scorsese shooting Singin’ in the Rain.
- Ambitious and personal drive—themes consistent from Chazelle’s films—compromises, determination

The purple sky- —again later with “City of Stars” song at the magic hour- pier at dusk- stunningly beautiful picture frame on a wall
- Their fight during “Fall” season- no long takes or shared mise-en-scene between the actors- they are edited separately and apart. it is cliché maybe with the editing- but is exemplary. The execution is perfect.
most underrated: It is becoming tiresome to have to mention Nicolas Winding Refn again in this category but here we are with The Neon Demon. It sits at the #39 slot for the year 2016 on the TSPDT consensus list. However, there is a silver lining- it actually jumped up last year which means it is gaining some momentum. Richard Linklater’s Everybody Wants Some!! is the next closest as it sits at #34 on the TSPDT list. This film is as underrated as Dazed and Confused used to be (Everybody Wants Some!! is the spiritual sequel to that 1993 film). This one may take awhile- it took decades for Dazed and Confused to be properly recognized.

The Neon Demon from Refn- here Refn is working with Elliott Hostetter on the production design. Hostetter’s accomplishments include Spring Breakers (2012) and Waves (2019)

a sublimely staged cinematic painting

it is remarkable how prolific Refn is able to be while still clearly designing every stitch in every frame
most overrated: Toni Erdmann as the number one film of 2016 is a small tragedy. It is a fine story with a unique dramatic/comedic blend, solid writing and performances- but there is no dedication to an aesthetic — nor is there any sort of thundering formal achievement at all.
trends and notables:
- Young talents Damien Chazelle and Barry Jenkins (both under forty years old- Chazelle’s third film and Jenkins’ second) help buoy a rockier year
- It is worth pausing to admire the year of Jim Jarmusch- Paterson gives him a top ten film of the year in 2016- making it the fourth consecutive decade Jarmusch has had at least one top ten of the year film.

Paterson– the days of the week in an overhead shot in bed (overheads used very often in Only Lovers Left Alive– Jarmusch’s previous effort from 2013). Driver checks his watch, kisses his wife, she tells him her dream, cereal, work, he fills his deal with poetry and the creative process (through text on the screen, elliptical editing of his daydreaming), dinner, walk, bar… fade to black… repeat)… starts and ends on Monday morning as bookends. Unlike La La Land, The Revenant, Birdman, Gravity , The Social Network and some others from this decade- Paterson takes the entire running time length of the film to appreciate. One will not be that impressed twenty minutes in or even forty minutes in– as Jarmusch is building this thing- it takes the completion for the formal precision sinks in. It is awe-inspiring in its own slow burn, sort of way.
- Mostly here this section is here to accentuate the positives- but it is worth noting the rare semi misfire 2016 was for Martin Scorsese and The Coen Brothers. The expectations are so high so when they fail to come close to a top ten, even in a down year, it does seem to echo a little.
- Finding Dory and Rogue One dominate the box office with Captain America: Civil War not far behind.
- For Nicolas Winding Refn 2016 and The Neon Demon marks the fourth time in the last eight years where he has made one of the best ten films of the year.
- Chazelle already had an archiveable film under his belt coming into 2016 so one could argue, certainly, that Barry Jenkins (archiveable debut here with Moonlight) is the true breakthrough as far as directors go.

Moonlight – a loud proclamation of a new voice in cinema- Jenkins’ Moonlight is his arrival. It is a meditation on masculinity—and, quite miraculously, one of the 21st century’s best cinematic character studies. It is about a shy character- so rare and refreshing- a counter-point. The painterly pastel tones from James Laxton as cinematographer deserves praise.
- Florence Pugh is the story on that front from an acting standpoint- Pugh seems destined for great things and Lady Macbeth is her first archiveable film

Florence Pugh captured in a great shot of production design decor in Lady Macbeth
gems I want to spotlight: The answers here in 2016 are Certain Women from Kelly Reichardt and 20th Century Women from Mike Mills and I am not even trying to be thematic in these choices. These films barely missed the top ten of the year and with another viewing could easily land on the back half of that list.

Certain Women – another tale set in the Pacific Northwest from Reichardt where the setting (train to open the film, mountains, the ranch, Native Americans in mall in Billings) is very much a character in the film. The 16mm graininess works with this approach as well. Reichardt emphasizes patience and dedramatizing big moments. There is realism here- just like her previous works- she shows the Gladstone (and Lily Gladstone is the best performance here and her and Kristen Stewart’s story the best of the three stories of women that are loosely connected in this anthology film) character going back to work after her meeting—cleaning horse stalls. The big scene with Gladstone and Stewart is so awkward, realistic and perfect- neither actress flinches. The film holds on many scenes and moments past the point of comfort in a 106 minute film- and this is a good thing.

20th Century Women is clearly a companion piece to Beginners (2010) from Mike Mills. Beginners was about his father and this is about his mother. Mills is an absolute master of tone and intimacy. The film is filled with great montages (more on that in a second) breaking up small honest moments between superb characters acted out by a top-notch cast (Annette Bening, Greta Gerwig, Billy Crudup, Elle Fanning, newcomer Lucas Jade Zumann. A gorgeous opening over the coast of Santa Barbara- a sort of a rag-tag makeshift family of supporting characters with Bening doing great work as the matriarch. Bright 1970’s California colors—yellow kitchen. Punk music photography montage. No less than three Talking Heads songs- inspired curation.
best performance male: Ryan Gosling has already put together an impressive career up to this point in 2016 but it seems unlikely that he will top La La Land. Gosling shows off some impressive piano playing skills- suspending our disbelief- and that Chet Baker-like voice is not bad either. Gosling is pitch perfect for the silent finale where his heart is just about removed from his body- he is stoic, an actor that underplays almost everything. There is no better cotemporary actor for this Steve McQueen “I’ll say it with my face” style. Emma Stone may give the better performance overall– but Gosling wins the big last moment of the best film of the year. Mahershala Ali is a revelation in Moonlight – a character of almost overwhelming goodness in his soul. Trevante Rhodes is one of three actors playing Moonlight’s Chiron/Little. Rhodes brilliantly pulls off playing a shy character– not easy to do. Adam Driver was in so many great films in the 2010s that they may all start to run together– but it is important to mark just how important Paterson was to his career. His first great performance in one of the best films of the year. Shia LaBeouf rocking a rattail slides into the final slot here for 2016- he does the best work of his career thus far in American Honey.

Trevante Rhodes in Barry Jenkins’ Moonlight. Rhodes quietly steals the film in the final chapter.
best performance female: Emma Stone gives her second great performance in a major 2010s masterpiece in 2016’s La La Land. The audition scene is Stone’s Naomi Watts in Mulholland Drive moment. The comedic talents of both Stone and Gosling are readily apparent. This is their third time working together and their chemistry is undeniable. There’s a sizeable gulf between Stone and anyone else here- but one would be remiss to overlook Kim Min-hee in The Handmaiden, Natalie Portman as Jackie O in Jackie, or Elle Fanning in Neon Demon (with some supporting help in 20th Century Women).

Emma Stone in Chazelle’s La La Land. Stone shows off her musical talents, comedic chops, and certainly dramatic acting abilities — all in a big, bold, heavyweight masterpiece.
top 10
- La La Land
- Moonlight
- Paterson
- The Handmaiden
- Jackie
- American Honey
- The Neon Demon
- Hell or High Water
- Everybody Wants Some!!
- Manchester by the Sea

a great composition from Cristian Mungiu- feels like a nod to the final shot from Asghar Farhadi’s 2011 film A Separation

Andrea Arnold (finest film to date easily)’s American Honey- wonderful use of music while riding in the van- a modern day Easy Rider in many ways – non professional actors used throughout including lead role- Sasha Lane.

Epic in scope (163 minutes) and stylistic ambition– cinema verite handheld– heavy closeups, fuzzy focus throttling, reoccurring use of sun spots. Some critics were down on the over the top social commentary and statement on poverty (a la Korine’s film– the stunning 2012 Spring Breakers film– also from A24)- but Arnold has some real sincerity here and this is a good love story. There may be some overlap- but Arnold and Korine are vastly different voices –American Honey is quite moving.

The Handmaiden was a reminder that Park Chan-wook is still one of the finest auteurs in contemporary cinema

again from Park Chan-wook’s work- a fine candidate for the greatest of all of 2016’s images and sequences

Arrival marks another resume-builder for auteur Denis Villeneuve and actor Amy Adams- both compiling an impeccable decade of work.

from James Schamus’ Indignation- David Bordwell has a must-read piece on the film http://www.davidbordwell.net/blog/2016/08/07/indignation-novel-into-film-novelistic-film/

setting the frame- symmetry and décor splendor from Pablo Larraín in Jackie

Larraín’s work is bolstered by his 2021 companion piece- Spencer. Both films are from the Todd Haynes’ (Safe, Carol) lineage.
Archives, Directors, and Grades
| 20th Century Women– Mills | R/HR |
| American Honey – Arnold | HR/MS |
| Arrival – Villeneuve | R/HR |
| Café Society- Allen | R |
| Captain America: Civil War- Russo | R |
| Certain Women– Reichardt | R/HR |
| Elle – Verhoeven | R/HR |
| Everybody Wants Some!! – Linklater | HR |
| Graduation – Mungiu | R |
| Hacksaw Ridge – Gibson | R |
| Hail, Caesar!- Coen | R |
| Hell or High Water- Mackenzie | HR |
| I, Daniel Blake – Loach | R |
| Indignation – Schamus | R |
| Jackie- Larraín | HR/MS |
| Julieta – Almodovar | R/HR |
| La La Land – Chazelle | MP |
| Lady Macbeth – Oldroyd | R |
| Love & Friendship – Stillman | R |
| Loving – J. Nichols | R |
| Manchester By the Sea– Lonergan | HR |
| Moonlight – B. Jenkins | MS/MP |
| Nocturnal Animals – T. Ford | R |
| Norman: The Moderate Rise and Tragic Fall of a New York Fixer – Cedar | R |
| Paterson – Jarmusch | MS |
| Raw – Ducournau | R |
| Silence – Scorsese | R |
| Split – Shyamalan | R |
| Sully – Eastwood | R |
| The Conjuring 2 – Wan | R |
| The Handmaiden- Chan-wook Park | HR/MS |
| The Jungle Book – Favreau | R |
| The Light Between Oceans – Cianfrance | R |
| The Lost City of Z – Gray | HR |
| The Neon Demon – Refn | HR/MS |
| The Salesman– Farhadi | R/HR |
| Things To Come- Hansen-Løve | R |
| Toni Erdmann – Ade | R |
| Train to Busan – Sang-ho Yeon | R |
| Under the Shadow – Anvari | R |
*MP is Masterpiece- top 1-3 quality of the year film
MS is Must-See- top 5-6 quality of the year film
HR is Highly Recommend- top 10 quality of the year film
R is Recommend- outside the top 10 of the year quality film but still in the archives
I think the castle in A Cure for Wellness is very much from the same ilk as the hotel in The Shining. The mountainside setting as well on the Swiss Alps. It’s a marvel of Set Design. Long corridors, hallways, caskets, tubs, oxygen tanks, vast sized laboratories etc. Not to mention the high-ceiling dance room. Verbinski has always been good at long and extensive set designs (and blowing them up). But this is peak. It’s a great setting. A naturalistic, isolated setting like The Shining. One of the trademarks with Verbinski is his pale green color scheme. I think in general it’s his preferred color. But there are shades of yellow and blue that are always around. Blue is actually very pronounced and is the main theme in The Weather Man. A more colorful blue than usual. Luc Besson is perhaps even closer to Kubrick in style. With his extensive tracking shots (Anna is the peak in this department) and the colourful set designs. Exotic and beautiful high society locations. You always get something extremely colorful and full of life with him which makes him stand out in this era of filmmaking. I think he is a filmmaker who is very much capable of making a masterpiece but hasn’t made one yet. I wish he had more patience and restraint. I think both Verbinski and Besson have a tendency to go for excess and outrageousness with the material. Both of them are bursting with ideas and high concepts as well. They are big personalities and I think it’s a great shame mainstream Hollywood lost these two. No matter how big or medium sized the budgets are they know what they want to do and do it. I love the passion they infuse into each and every film. Very worthy Kubrick acolytes.
A Cure for Wellness (2016)
https://imgur.com/a/cure-wellness-2016-YHfr3Gr
Some of the stories behind the making of Verbinski’s films are outrageous. The lengths he went to achieve Practical Effects. I gathered some snippets here.
“In A Cure for Wellness, The water tank scenes took two weeks to film. DeHaan and the director communicated through an intercom, and DeHaan wore a buoyancy and body-positioning waist harness connected with wires and an oxygen tank.”
“In A Cure for Wellness, Verbinski and the crew used a rubber drill in the scene where Dr. Brennan, the facility’s dentist, drills through Mr. Lockhart’s healthy tooth without anesthesia. According to DeHaan, he was genuinely nervous and his reaction was used in the filming. Verbinski stated that the scene had compositing, and DeHaan stated there was no outright CGI. DeHaan filmed the scene while wearing a dental gag and strapped to the chair.”
“In A Cure for Wellness, In the car crash scene, DeHaan was placed into a harness inside a device described by Bryan Alexander of USA Today as being similar to a rotisserie before being tossed around. DeHaan stated that he experienced his sole filming injury there, in which his arm was dislocated from and then relocated into the socket in its shoulder.”
“In The Lone Ranger, Armie Hammer recalled that the production budget was so extravagant that when needing to coach Tom Wilkinson on how to flip his pocket watch and chain, the world’s best yo-yo expert was flown in to teach Wilkinson, and continued to be on call during filming.”
“In The Lone Ranger, For the train scenes seen in the film, a large oval shaped track had to be built near Albuquerque, New Mexico, to have rail lines that went north, south, east, and west. There were a total of six railroad locations in the film, but the oval was the largest. All the work was done by the Gandy Dancer Railroad and Excavating Services, who brought in 3,889,425 pounds of 33-foot rail, bars, tie places, and ties from Blythe, California. The whole rail line had to be removed after filming was completed, because the rail line had no outside interchange.”
“In The Lone Ranger, The trains used in the film could reach 30 miles per hour, which was the standard speed for locomotives during that era. An EMD SW1500 diesel switcher was used for the scenes that did not show the steam locomotives.”
“In The Lone Ranger, The locomotives and rolling stock seen in the film were all built in a machine shop in Sun Valley, California. One of the two locomotives, a 4-6-0 or Ten-wheeler, was used in the beginning of the film and then was renovated into the “Constitution” locomotive seen later in the film. The other locomotive, a 4-4-0 or American, was based on the Central Pacific Jupiter that was on hand for the real Golden Spike Ceremony up on Promontory Point. For easy movement, the locomotives and rail cars were built in the same fashion as shipping containers so they could be added and removed from their chassis and then transported on flatbed trucks. This method was also used in part of the train chase scene that took place in the mountains since they could not build any railroad tracks up in the mountains.”
“In Rango, The movie was not motion captured. The actors actually perform the scenes as if making a live movie. And the footage was used as a reference to make the animation.”
“In PotC: At World’s End, The Singapore city was constructed out of 40 buildings within a tank that was 24 meters (78.7 feet) long, 40 meters (131.2 feet) wide, and one meter (3.2 feet) deep. Not much is known, historically, about 18th century Singapore, so the filmmakers based the set design on Chinese and Malaysian cities of the same period, in an Expressionist style.”
“In PotC: At World’s End, According to Gore Verbinski, the Singapore scenes were intended to parody spa culture. A naturally humid atmosphere was achieved with a careful combination of lighting equipment and gallons of water, and fungi were allowed to grow within the set, to enhance the mood.”
“In PotC: At World’s End, The climactic sea battle was shot in an air hanger at Palmdale, California, where the cast had to wear wetsuits underneath their costumes on angle-tipped ships. The water-drenched set was kept in freezing temperatures to prevent bacterial infection.”
“In PotC: At World’s End, The maelstrom sequence took ten weeks to film, and was extremely difficult for the actors. Keira Knightley said, “[The water is] literally in your eyes the entire time, and you’ve got an entire camera crew… coming at you.” Geoffrey Rush said, “When [my] costume is wet, I weigh 45 pounds more. And underneath, you can barely move.” Kevin McNally said, “Oh, my God. How wet can a man be?”
“In PotC: Dead Man’s Chest, Gore Verbinski wanted to keep the Flying Dutchman crew realistic, rejecting a character with a turtle shell, and the animators watched various David Attenborough documentaries to study the movement of sea anemones and mussels.”
“In PotC: The Curse of the Black Pearl, It was important to differentiate the Black Pearl crew members from one another even when they were in their skeleton form. The eyes used for the characters are actually the actors’ eyes, just one of the decisions made between Gore Verbinski and ILM to give the skeletal versions of the characters a personality. Likewise, in the end scene, Johnny Depp’s real eyes are used for skeleton Jack Sparrow. Verbinski notes that Geoffrey Rush’s Barbossa is the only character in the film who delivers the typical, pirate, hard R.”
“In PotC: The Curse of the Black Pearl, After the box office failure of The Country Bears (2002), then Disney CEO Michael Eisner attempt to shut down production of the film because he thought it wouldn’t perform well and wasn’t a fan of Johnny Depp’s performance. However, Gore Verbinski told his concept artists to keep working on the picture, and when Eisner came to visit, the executive was astonished by what had been created.”
“In PotC: The Curse of the Black Pearl, Gore Verbinski talks about two terms that were created on set, “visual effects ad lib” and “stunt ad lib.” Verbinski would come up with stunts and action beats on set that he would pitch to stunt coordinator George Ruge, and the coordinator would devise how to perform the action right then and there. Sometimes this would come after months of rehearsing one action only to throw in a different stunt to replace it on the spot. One such stunt was the one at the end of the film where Sparrow launches up out of the water and lands on the deck of his ship.”
“In MouseHunt, The mousetraps scene was completed without any digital effects. Over 800 mousetraps were set individually and rigged with wires under the floor. It took several takes, so each trap had to be reset, baited, and wired one at a time.”
“In MouseHunt, While close-ups used an animatronic rodent, and some scenes involved CGI, most shots were made using a team of 60 field mice trained by animal trainer Boone Narr. The mice were trained for everything from running and climbing to sleeping in a sardine can underneath a tissue paper blanket.”
“In MouseHunt, Having analyzed mountains of reference material, the Winston team used soft foam to construct the mouse body. “A mouse is a very squishy little animal,” said Mahan. “It’s always compressing or inflating. It can go under little cracks in doors because it’s so flexible. So we thought we’d make him light and floppy-looking rather than have too many hard skeletal structures inside. That way, we could flatten him down or puff him up.” From a sculpture by Paul Mejias, the body was fabricated by Lynette Eklund with small metal legs that were then attached and covered in silicone skin.”
Gore Verbinski filmography ranked-:
Films ranked:
1. A Cure for Wellness (2016) – MP
2. The Weather Man (2005) – MP
3. The Ring (2002) – MS
4. Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die (2025) – HR
5. Rango (2011) – HR
6. MouseHunt (1997) – HR
7. The Mexican (2001) – HR
8. Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl (2003) – HR
9. The Lone Ranger (2013) – R/HR
10. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest (2006)/At World’s End (2007) – R/HR
– Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest (2006) – R/HR
– Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End (2007) – R/HR
Performances ranked:
1. Nicolas Cage – The Weather Man
2. Dane DeHaan – A Cure for Wellness
3. Michael Caine – The Weather Man
4. Nathan Lane – MouseHunt
5. Mia Goth – A Cure for Wellness
6. Haley Lu Richardson – Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die
7. Naomi Watts – The Ring
8. Johnny Depp – Rango
9. Geoffrey Rush – Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl
10. James Gandolfini – The Mexican
11. Tom Wilkinson – The Lone Ranger
12. Jason Isaacs – A Cure for Wellness
13. Johnny Depp – Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl
14. Sam Rockwell – Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die
15. Bill Nighy – Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest/At World’s End
16. Johnny Depp – Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest/At World’s End
17. Geoffrey Rush – Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest/At World’s End
18. Chow Yun-fat – Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End
19. Bill Nighy – Rango
20. Ned Beatty – Rango
21. Jack Davenport – Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl
22. James Badge Dale – The Lone Ranger
23. Naomie Harris – Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest/At World’s End
24. Juno Temple – Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die
25. Michael Peña – Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die
26. Johnny Depp – The Lone Ranger
27. Armie Hammer – The Lone Ranger
28. Martin Henderson – The Ring
29. Lee Evans – MouseHunt
30. Christopher Walken – Mousehunt
31. William Fichtner – The Lone Ranger
32. David Dorfman – The Ring
33. Jack Davenport – Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest/At World’s End
34. Stellan Skarsgård – Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest/At World’s End
35. Brian Cox – The Ring
36. Harry Groener – A Cure for Wellness
37. Harry Dean Stanton – Rango
38. Ruth Wilson – The Lone Ranger
39. Isla Fisher – Rango
40. William Hickey – MouseHunt
I think changing the visual design of your film to suit the narrative and story is an underrated trait. I mean Fassbinder for example always went for particular colour schemes for his films. Especially something like Lola is lit and shot in candy colours. Which is completely different from something like The Marriage of Maria Braun. Then you have someone like Argento who used fluorescent lighting which was specific for Suspiria and Inferno. But his other films like Tenebre for example have a completely different visual design. Phenomena with its rural lush landscapes have its own specific visual design. One cannot bash Tenebre for not having the same visual style of Suspiria. If Argento used the same style it would have looked completely out of place in Tenebre. Of course Mario Bava is another director who always changed up the visual design of his films to suit the narrative in that specific film. Look at Blood and Black Lace vs The Whip and the Body. If Bava used the same lighting design as Blood and Black Lace for The Whip and the Body it would look completely out of place. The point is not being a fan of one visual design over the other but the ability to change up the style to suit the story you are telling.
Now coming to Verbinski, he is also someone who employs a specific visual design especially in his top films. Having beautiful colours is not the point in either The Ring or A Cure for Wellness. These are sick worlds, sick societies. They don’t have much colour and liveliness in them. The Ring uses heavy green tinting. Which could be make or break for some. But its done to show the sickness in the society. Then there is also subtle nuances like getting rid of the green tinting altogether when they arrive at the girl’s cabin. And using a warm yellow color palette. A Cure for Wellness have a drastic location change from the cold, sterile offices in the US to rural, warm countryside of the Swiss Alps. The latter is the main setting. This film has astonishing attention to detail. The pale greens and whites are everywhere. Long hallways. It’s set design apex. Desaturated colour palette.
Now, The Weather Man is another different visual design. If someone bashes Verbinski for the desaturated colours in some of his films like The Lone Ranger and A Cure for Wellness, the Weatherman has extremely strong colorful blues and a natural colour palette. It’s everywhere from the set designs to the costumes to the objects/equipment. In one scene a character goes on a ride in his car and even the roadside billboards are heavily decorated with strong blues. Crazy attention to detail.
Like I said for A Cure for Wellness before, The Mexican also has a drastic location change from the US to Mexico. The colour palette for US is more sterile, cold while the colour palette for Mexico is harsh and warm. The cross cutting between the Brad Pitt storyline and the Julia Roberts storyline exemplifies the difference. Some of the flashbacks in A Cure for Wellness also uses this difference to great effect. Not only that The Mexican also has location specific decor and detail. The US setting seems to have a lot of blues while The Mexican setting has greenish lighting in multiple instances. The Mexican even has a 3rd ancient setting which is shot with a completely desaturated colour palette.
It’s amazing the way Verbinski integrates the weather and changing of the seasons into his narratives in both MouseHunt and especially in The Weather Man
Not to mention showing a deteriorating society (eating fast food, watching television, mobile phones addiction, using virtual reality equipment, drug use by minors) in many of his works
One thing I love about Verbinski’s films are the complex characterizations. First, the protagonists. I think the protagonists in films like MouseHunt (the Nathan Lane character), Rango, A Cure for Wellness are thematically very consistent. These are people who have a false sense of what is true success. They disregard good values and relationships in favour of monetary and hierarchical success. With the issues they face in the film they realize what they were doing is wrong and building relationships and caring for others is essential as much as personal success. Now coming to the antagonists. The antagonists in Rango, The Lone Ranger, A Cure for Wellness are extremely rich characters. They present themselves as saviours. The person who can guide society towards glory. They do all the right things, speak all the right things and certainly behave very much like good guys in public. But underneath they have their own personal goals which are detrimental to the society. These are people who believe in advancement at the cost of human lives and livelihood.
From the very start there is a theme here with Verbinski where it’s the human beings and their actions that causes their doom not surreal or non human entities like the mouse or Samara. A Cure for Wellness represents this as well as the earlier antagonist theme I spoke about in his filmography. Rango and The Lone Ranger are a bit tame in the earlier department but very much feature the second. The Weather Man also taps into the earlier protagonist theme I mentioned where the protagonist have a false sense of success (professionally here) and basically acts as a puppet just like in Rango.
In quite a few of his films, Verbinski shoots some sections of his films in complete washed out monochrome. The Pistol backstory scenes in the ancient setting in The Mexican, The scenes inside Davy Jones’ Locker in Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End, The meeting with the Spirit of the West in Rango. It’s an excellent choice and gives off that otherworldly feeling.
Favourite scene from every Gore Verbinski-:
* MouseHunt (1997) – The climax
* The Mexican (2001) – The lover assassination
* The Ring (2002) – The horse escape
* Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl (2003) – The duel between Sparrow and Turner
* The Weather Man (2005) – The ice skating race
* Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest (2006) – Searching for the treasure at the island
* Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End (2007) – Sparrow with himself at Davy Jones’ Locker
* Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides (2011) – The Epilogue with Sparrow and Gibbs
* Rango (2011) – The meeting with the Spirit of the West
* The Lone Ranger (2013) – The Rangers massacre
* A Cure for Wellness (2016) – The sequence with Mia Goth at the bar
* Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die (2025) – The sequence inside the boy’s living room
I’m amused by the difference in dynamic between Jena Malone and Abbey Lee here in The Neon Demon to both of them in Horizon: An American Saga – Chapter 1. These two play very different characters in the latter and have a completely different dynamic with each other. Talented actresses. Costner is stiff as he always seems to be. The walk up the hill sequence between Costner and Jamie Campbell Bower is probably the best sequence in Horizon. But Horizon goes up a notch whenever these two are on the screen. Especially together. This film goes off the rails after Jena Malone disappears from the film.
A Cure for Wellness is is the greatest crystallization of Gore Verbinski’s exposed neurosis on screen. It’s like he was constrained by the limits of big budget family-friendly filmmaking with a lighter tone and let it all out here. He was always a very gifted Production Designer and Visual Effects artist. But this is something else.
Dane DeHaan had a moment here with A Cure for Wellness in 2016 and Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets in 2017.
@Drake- What are the Sebastian Stan films you have in the archives?
@Malith- – I recently added The Apprentice — unvetted:
2008- Rachel Gettting Married
2010- Black Swan
2015- The Martian
2017- I, Tonya
2017- Lucky Logan
2018- Black Panther
2020- The Devil All the Time
2022- Fresh
2023- Sharper
2023- Dumb Money
@Drake- What did you think of A Different Man? Is it worth watching?
@Drake- These pages are not working.
* 20th Century Women
* Graduation
* Manchester by the Sea
* Nocturnal Animals
* Toni Erdmann
@Malith- Thank you- should be fixed
The contrast in dynamic between Jena Malone and Abbey Lee in The Neon Demon to them in Horizon: American Saga – Chapter 1 is striking.
The 15 Best Films and Performances of 2016 according to 11 users of this site:
1. La La Land
2. The Handmaiden
3. Moonlight
4. Paterson
5. The Neon Demon
6. Jackie
7. Arrival
8. American Honey
9. Silence
10. Manchester By the Sea
11. The Night Of
12. Hell or High Water
13. The Lost City of Z
14. Raw
15. Everybody Wants Some!!
1. Emma Stone – La La Land
2. Ryan Gosling – La La Land
3. Natalie Portman – Jackie
4. Adam Driver – Paterson
5. Casey Affleck – Manchester by the Sea
6. Kim Min-hee – The Handmaiden
7. Mahershala Ali – Moonlight
8. John Turturro – The Night Of
9. Riz Ahmed – The Night Of
10. Andrew Garfield – Silence
11. Amy Adams – Arrival
12. Elle Fanning – The Neon Demon
13. Isabelle Huppert – Elle
14. Kim Tae-ri – The Handmaiden
15. Travante Rhodes – Moonlight
@Drake- Have you seen Christine (2016) from Antonio Campos?
Heathcote plays a very different character in Relic than here in The Neon Demon. Same with Malone in Horizon: American Saga than here in The Neon Demon. Impressive range from both actresses in solid meaty roles.
Also the dynamic between Malone & Abbey Lee in Horizon: America Saga is very different than in The Neon Demon. They have great chemistry together.
And Toni Erdmann – Ade, Train to Busan – Sang-ho Yeon, Under the Shadow – Anvari, Silence – Scorsese, Nocturnal Animals-Ford, Moonlight-Jenkins, Manchester by the Sea-Lonergan, La La Land-Chazelle, Julieta-Almodovar, Graduation-Mungiu, 20th Century Women-Mills, Arrival-Villeneuve.
Jena Malone got more award attention for The Neon Demon than Elle Fanning.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1974419/awards/?ref_=tt_awd