best film: Marlon Brando has Francis Ford Coppola to thank (and certainly more than a little to thank the other way around) for this category with The Godfather and Apocalypse Now as clearly Brando’s top two films. Brando was already a living legend and acting icon in the 1970s (from his string of work in the 1950s) but undoubtedly in a long career tailspin when he and Coppola collaborated. Brando is electric in Apocalypse Now as Colonel Walter Kurtz – perhaps the greatest of all the Harry Lime-like roles (from Orson Welles in The Third Man – a character that is talked about for the entire running time but rarely appears on screen). When he finally does appear on screen – Brando is absolutely mesmerizing. He and Kurtz are most definitely worthy of such a buildup and this all in one of the two greatest films ever made.

Brando stuns in roughly fifteen (15) minutes of screen time in Apocalypses Now

after a long, dormant period – Brando would explode in 1972 with not one, but two of the best performances of the decade (including The Godfather)
best performance: On the Waterfront. With On the Waterfront and A Streetcar Named Desire Brando changed film acting. Sure, he is preceded (just a few years) by Montgomery Clift in regard to method acting and the generational shift at the midway point of the 20th century and yes, Paul Muni is an important figure in the lineage of Brando (Muni decades before of course) as well – specifically when talking about an actor transforming for a role (and one could argue Lon Cheney before that). But still, no one actor had the impact Brando did on film acting. His instinctual style in On the Waterfront is still significant today. Brando’s famous glove scene (improvising with Eve Marie Saint), the physical and emotional tour-de-force throughout, and the final speech to Rod Steiger in the back of the car at the end (inspiring monologues to end Raging Bull and Boogie Nights among others) show a true virtuoso at work.

Brando as Terry Malloy in On the Waterfront – the height of the Brando revolution in the 1950s
stylistic innovations/traits: Marlon Brando is, unequivocally, an artist. He is the most talented actor of all-time and if that is all that mattered for this list, then he would be, without hesitation, in the #1 slot. Brando’s resume makes for another story. His top five films below are strong indeed – he is more than acceptable there (though the masterpiece number is a sight lower than others that will follow Brando on this list). He is in, and sets the screen ablaze, in two of best films of all-time (Apocalypse Now, The Godfather). Brando gives two of the better performances of the 1950s (Streetcar, On the Waterfront) and gives two of the best performances of the 1970s (Last Tango, Godfather). These five films and the weight of his genius are the case for Brando. Julius Caesar may even slide into that group as a sort of backup dancer or be on the fringe of that upper class. The camerawork on Brando is in Julius Caesar is sublime – Mankiewicz knows he has something special – there is a crane that backs up and expands when Brando yells to give him space and then comes back in closer at the more intimate end of the scene. Brando’s case gets a little shaky beyond that top six (6) though. Slots seven (7) through ten (10) below cannot contend with his peers at the top of this list. Brando has twenty-one (21) total films in the archives – far less than most of the others the per film average argument does not work as his list of twenty-one (21) includes plenty of films like A Dry White Season, Superman, and The Freshman. Brando was often disinterested in his own career – and even sort of contemptuous of the profession of acting. He threw away almost an entire decade in his prime. His work in the 1960s is remarkable in its unremarkableness. And Brando was done after Apocalypse Now for all practical purposes at the age of fifty-five (55). Still, Brando is a fascinating sort of solo show in many films that ended up well outside of their respective year’s top twenty (20) – films like The Missouri Breaks, Guys and Dolls, Sayonara. Brando broke onto the scene in 1950 and rifled off an impressive run of six (6) straight archiveable films and four (4) Oscar nominations (and one win) in five (5) years. Speculation is that something happened with On the Waterfront (rumors persist that he felt betrayed by Elia Kazan who used the film as a defense for his HUAC actions). Kazan and Brando would never work together again despite their success together. Brando seems to have an air of disinterest in his own work (even when he is masterful) ever since. Again, his career from On the Waterfront to The Godfather (ages 30 to 48) is nothing special – and it does not include a single film that whiffs a top ten of the year. Still, when Brando was on – there was nobody better. For those glass half full people, the chills Brando can induce, witnessing him as Vito Corleone, Stanley Kowalski, or Mark Anthony – holds no match. For the glass have empty crew, there is a lot of headshaking to be had at that filmography, the clear apathy, and those wasted years.

Brando in Bertolucci’s Last Tango in Paris – an important role for Brando – it is on on the very short list of best performances of the 1970s
directors worked with: Elia Kazan (3), Joseph Mankiewicz (2), Francis Ford Coppola (2), Arthur Penn (2), Fred Zinnemann (1), Sidney Lumet (1), Bernardo Bertolucci (1)

the true start of Brando’s legend – as Stanley Kowalski in 1951’s A Streetcar Named Desire
top ten performances:
- On the Waterfront
- The Godfather
- A Streetcar Named Desire
- The Last Tango in Paris
- Apocalypse Now
- Julius Caesar
- The Wild One
- The Fugitive Kind
- The Young Lions
- The Missouri Breaks
archiveable films
| 1950- The Men |
| 1951- A Streetcar Named Desire |
| 1952- Vita Zapata |
| 1953- Julius Caesar |
| 1953- The Wild One |
| 1954- On the Waterfront |
| 1955- Guys and Dolls |
| 1957- Sayonara |
| 1958- The Young Lions |
| 1960- The Fugitive King |
| 1961- One-Eyed Jacks |
| 1965- Morituri |
| 1966- The Chase |
| 1969- Burn! |
| 1972- The Godfather |
| 1972- The Last Tango in Paris |
| 1976- The Missouri Breaks |
| 1978- Superman |
| 1979- Apocalypse Now |
| 1989- A Dry White Season |
| 1990- The Freshman |
Brando actually tried to replicate what he did with Last Tango in Paris 3 years earlier with Burn!. Starring in the follow-up film from an Italian director(Pontecorvo, Bertolucci) coming off a highly acclaimed film(The Battle of Algiers, The Conformist).
@Lionel- Burn! is a tough film -good for you tracking that down and crossing it off the list
21 archivable films from 36 credits between his start and his last one The Freshman in 1990. That’s a better ratio than Daniel Day-Lewis actually.
A strange thing with Brando, in his top 6 performances, I’m pretty sure On the Waterfront is the only one where he has the most screentime.
@Anderson- yes, that checks out- and that’s quite interesting
@Drake – “Marlon Brando is, unequivocally, an artist”
I am curious what you mean by this, not saying I disagree I just don’t know what it means. There are great actors who are not artists? Is Pacino an artist?
@James Trapp-I think he means actors like John Wayne, Clint Eastwood etc. who has the same screen persona. I could be wrong though.
*Eastwood and Wayne not artists like Brando as actors
@James Trapp- I think it is debatable for most of the other great actors – just description when comparing Brando to the more workmanlike unbelievably productive (superior to Brando’s) careers of both De Niro and Stewart ahead of Brando on this list.
@Drake – Okay, that makes sense. There is an undeniable magnetism with Brando that is hard to put into words, even compared to other great actors. Got Last Tango in Paris coming up soon for Bertolucci Study. I was actually thinking of doing a full on Brando Study at some point although that probably would not work as well as a director study so maybe just keep watching his films on the side.
@James Trapp-You should do a Dirk Bogarde study. I did a small one.
The Damned
Death in Venice
The Night Porter
Providence
A Bridge Too Far
Despair
Especially The Night Porter here is one you would not catch or get to in a director’s study. It’s a unique story/film with a poetic, brilliant performance from Bogarde. A Bridge too Far as well which is a big budget production with most of the best actors working at the time. It’s a bit weird to seem him here when he was doing all those European art house films but he has the lead role here(It’s ensemble but still) and delivers the famous line to Connery. Also the parachute landing sequence is undoubtedly one of the best scenes of 1977 even if the rest of the film can’t live up to it.
@Malith – I’ve seen 4 of the 5 films he made with Losey when I did my Losey study. Great actor. I love Rocco and his Brothers and The Leopard so I will probably do a study for him soon. I’ll add the others on my to watch list.
@Malith – and by him I meant Luchino Visconti, and then watch the others at some point
@James Trapp-Have you ever done a Fassbinder or Resnais study? I have only seen Despair and Providence from both each and was impressed. Especially Despair. Which is one of my favourite films of all-time. Bogarde has a home run demeaning the David Warner and Volker Spengler characters at every opportunity in the two films. The plot is very similar in the two films I thought for some reason. Although the execution is different of course
@Malith – No to both
@Drake – could you imagine Brando ever working with Welles? And I am not even referring to any specific film; could that have been a serious possibility or would their ego’s suffocate each other?
@James Trapp- Right- I can’t even picture it. I mean they could have acted together like Welles in support making a buck to fund his directing career as a maverick with Paul Newman in The Long, Hot Summer. But I can’t see it with Welles as director. It would have had to have been at a time when like Brando was an unknown for a half a minute on the way up in the early 1950s
@Drake – Yeah, I was trying to think of potential auteurs that Brando could have worked with. When this page first came out it occured to me that I had only seen 4 Brando films, although the 4 I had seen were 4 of the top 5; On the Waterfront, The Godfather, A Streetcar Named Desire, and Apocalypse Now. The only one I had not seen was The Last Tango in Paris. I have since watched it and was amazed by the performance. I have also since watched The Wild One and The Freshman. Brando is always amazing when he is on screen, and basically owns every moment. It really makes me wish he had worked with more auteurs and taken his career more seriously.
What’s your Brando performance ranking?
@Matthew – of the 7 Brando films I have seen I would go:
1. On the Waterfront
2. The Godfather
3. The Last Tango in Paris
4. Apocalypse Now
5. A Streetcar Named Desire
6. The Wild One
7. The Freshman
The Freshman (1990) he is playing a parody of his Godfather character. The film overall is nothing amazing but its kind of genius from a comedic standpoint
A strange thing I noticed about Brando is I have watched 7 of his films and he only has the most screentime in On The Waterfront I think. In films like A Streetcar Named Desire(V.Leigh), The Godfather(Pacino), Last Tango in Paris(Schneider), Missouri Breaks(Nicholson) and The Freshman(Broderick) others have more screentime even though Brando got top billing.
*Apocalypse Now(Sheen) as well
@Malith – I noticed this as well but he completely takes over when he is on screen. He owns every scene he is a part of. Even with The Godfather, arguably the greatest cast of all time, Brando commands your attention at all times.
@James Trapp-Right. He does.
@Malith- add Julius Caesar to the mix here – he dominates in a supporting role
https://thecinemaarchives.com/2019/02/06/julius-caesar-1953-mankiewicz/
@James: My interpretation was that it’s about actors who are on this list despite not collaborating with great directors that much. Actors who have their own style. On the mitchum page he says the following.
Mitchum is a bit of an anomaly as he largely succeeded, artistically, in his career without the backing of a singular collaborative auteur.
Mitchum’s on-screen persona (his style is closer to the classic Hollywood Humphrey Bogart type than the Marlon Brando/Montgomery Clift/James Dean type) is an existential longer, an outsider who does not give a rip. Mitchum called the dialogue “lyrics” and there is most definitely a rhythm to his way of delivery – very musical. If someone believes in the actor as auteur theory – Mitchum is a poster child. His character is always in the know, brooding, with his destiny set (usually against him).
Tough to make the argument for Brando considering he can disappear into the character and the fact he was disinterested for long stretches.
Every great actor can elevate a film but this is probably more about those who never got great material.
Mitchum & Newman, for example, are ranked ahead of Sydow despite him being a Bergman player.
@AP – Initially, I interpreted it differently, but your explanation makes more sense. By that definition I wonder if Denzel would qualify. He has a certain persona and makes otherwise unremarkable films like Training Day (2001), American Gangster (2007), and Flight (2012) watchable.
@AP- I like this- good work
@Drake – on the Bogart page you say the following:
“If there very was a case for the actor as auteur theory, Humphrey Bogart has to be its poster child. Robert Mitchum (the closest second), Paul Newman, The Marx Brothers, Steve McQueen – all fine choices – but Bogart makes the most sense. He is so damn good from 1941 to 1955 seemingly almost regardless of the director or material. He seems to elevate the level of every film he is in by a grade.”
Should Brando be on that top 5 list of actor as auteur? Maybe I am misinterpreting this concept but are you saying that certain actors, with Bogart being chief among them, can elevate a medicre film better than anyone else by putting their own stamp on the film.
@James Trapp- I think that’s part of it- and maybe looking at that group- I mean they’re doing most of their important work without the big auteurs.
Brando is always fascinating and worth watching because of the sheer abundance of talent- but there’s a certain lack of consistency there that I think would keep him away from a Bogart or Mitchum. I think some of that is Brando himself- just seems to be either bored at times (those 1960s are fairly rough) or challenging himself (hitting heights neither Bogart nor Mitchum could hit) – no middle ground
@Drake-Can you see Dirk Bogarde playing the Brando role in Last Tango in Paris?
@Anderson- I cannot. Bogarde is a superb actor and I’m sure he’d give it a valiant effort and one we’d applaud in a world where the Brando version didn’t exist. But in a world where the Brando world exists- I cannot see this.
Oh I’m not saying Bogarde would do better than Brando. But I think he would still give one of the best performances of the year in it if he landed the role. It would be different but he would really excel in scenes like the one with his dead wife’s corpse. He did scenes like these with Thulin(in a catatonic state at one point) in The Damned. Also this erotic passion, Dirk tackled in The Night Porter. A film that has quite a few similarities with Last Tango in Paris.
My ranking of Brando performances I have seen:
1.The Last Tango in Paris
2.The Godfather
3.On the Waterfront
4.A Streetcar Named Desire
5.Apocalypse Now
6.Missouri Breaks
7.The Freshman
Brando’s best films ranked:
1.The Godfather(1972)-MP
2.Apocalypse Now(1979)-MP
3.Last Tango in Paris(1972)-MS
4.On the Waterfront(1954)-MS
5.A Streetcar Named Desire(1951)-MS
6.Julius Caesar(1953)-HR
And that’s it. However his 21 archiveable films are quite impressive from only 45 acting credits. And he is the lead/co-lead in at least 19 of them. Even in the other two he got an Oscar nomination for his supporting role in A Dry White Season(1989)
@Malith – I have very similar list
1.The Godfather(1972)-MP
2.Apocalypse Now(1979)-MP
4.On the Waterfront(1954)-MP
3.Last Tango in Paris(1972)-MS
5.A Streetcar Named Desire(1951)-MS
Still need too watch Julius Caesar(1953)
@James-I have seen some of Brando’s other films like The Missouri Breaks(1976), The Freshman(1990) and even The Score(2001). But didn’t include them here because they are nothing special and not near top 10 of the year quality. Brando is definitely the most fascinating actor. Most of his performances has a mysterious quality. In the Godfather he is absent for most of the movie. Ditto for until the last 30 minutes of Apocalypse Now. Vivien Leigh is our narrative vehicle in A Streetcar Named Desire. Maria Schneider has more screen time than him in Last Tango in Paris and there is a substantial amount of time in the film without Brando with Schneider and Leaud. Even in Minor films like The Missouri Breaks he is completely absent in the first half of the movie. Ditto for The Freshman. Yet when he appears he takes over.
@Malith – agreed that he basically dominates when on screen. One of my favorite scenes from any film is the conversation between Vito and Michael near the end of The Godfather (1972). The “I never wanted this life for you” scene with Pacino’s Michael responding “we’ll get there pops”. Its brilliant in an understated way. The acting is so great from both of them that every time I watch it I always get so into the story that I am momentarily forgetting that I am watching arguably 2 of the top 5 or so actors of all time.
Yeah. That scene has grown on me. First time other scenes impressed me more. But now this one I would consider to be right at the top. Probably just behind the Pacino train noise amplifying murder.
@James-The ending is a disaster in this film. Everything about it. Took me out of it. The only film I have seen that had a worse ending than this is Hulk(2003) from Ang Lee. I really liked this one up until that point. This had some absolutely gold comic moments.
Obviously not a major film, but I just watched The Freshman, not sure I’ve ever seen an actor parody himself like that in another film. Of course other actors may parody a role but its pretty genius as far as comedy goes, quite hilarious. Brando brings back the Vito Corleone mannerisms and voice
@James Trapp- It is a strange sort of thing – De Niro does something similar in the Analyze This and Analyze That movies. He isn’t so much riffing on one specific role (like Brando with Vito Corleone)- but yeah
He worked with John Huston once in “Reflections in a Golden Eye”. Have you seen that one? Is it bad?
@George- I have seen it Reflections in a Golden Eye and did not see much in it to praise
Marlon Brando in Last Tango in Paris is the best film acting performance of all time. I’m with Ethan Hawke here. I don’t think the film is that good. It is very uneven. The Léaud character is a disaster. Brando makes it great. If another actor was in this role this could go wrong in so many ways.
@Malith – I just watched Last Tango in Paris for the very first time. I went into it knowing very little. It was an incredible performance, mesmerizing really. Brando disappears into roles but in a slightly different way than say Oldman or Daniel Day Lewis. It is kind of hard to describe actually but it’s almost like with Brando I start out aware that I am watching Brando but then forget where as with Oldman or Daniel Day Lewis they often look and talk so different that right from the start I’m not really consciously thinking about that I am watching them. I’ll try to articulate that better at some point, just relaying which initial thoughts
As for the Léaud character, it kills me to say it given how much I love him in Truffaut films particuarly the entire Antoine Doinel Series but I have to agree with you 100 percent here. Its almost like he’s acting in a Truffaut film, his character has similarities to his character in Day for Night (1973) plus the Antoine Doinel Series, especially the later ones. Basically its like he’s in an entirely different film than Brando, it just doesn’t work. Certainly Bertolucci deserves a good portion of the blame as well.
None the less it had tremendous moments, basically every Brando scene and then scenes that don’t work which was pretty much every scene with the Léaud character. So as you say, definitley uneven, but the artistic highs and performance from the 2 leads still makes it a very strong film in my opinion.
“He is the most talented actor of all-time and if that is all that mattered for this list, then he would be, without hesitation, in the #1 slot.”
This may be a difficult question to answer but how would you define “talent”
Here are some factors I thought of, feel free to disagree or add to the list
Ability to transform into a role, be a chameleon basically – some one like Daniel Day Lewis or Gary Oldman
Ability to have empathy for a character – someone like Sean Penn
Physical Giifts – someone like Tom Cruise
Versatility in Characters – someone like Philip Seymour Hoffman
Ability to effectively change gears within a film – Al Pacino woud be a good example
@James Trapp – Yes- the definition here would be the sort of natural aptitude textbook definition. But good question and I like this breakdown here
Are we back to daily pages with this and Stewart signalling that?
@Harry – That’s the goal- it won’t always happen I’m sure. But I figured every other day with 100 actors is over 6 months and I’d like to have this done well before the end of the year and get a few other projects done.
@Drake – that is fantastic news, love waking up to these pages.
@Malith- thank you for the cleanup help
The biggest surprise here for me is The Missouri Breaks at 10 in his best performances even above some of his oscar nominated roles like Viva Zapata!, Sayonara and A Dry White Season.
The most talented actor ever. My top 10 of his performances :
1 – The Godfather
2 – On The Waterfront
3 – A Streetcar Named Desire
4 – The Last Tango in Paris
5 – Apocalypse Now
6 – Julius Caesar
7 – The Chase
8 – Burn!
9 – One-Eyed Jacks
10 – The Wild One