Skip to content
Mirror – 1975 Tarkovsky
- Extremely personal “auteur” cinema but at the same time very political
- Features, like many of his other films, much of his fathers’ poetry
- There are some gorgeous shots features rain or water dripping- a reoccurring visual trait for Tarkovsky- there’s a stunning one featured here with rain dripping from the roof in the foreground with a log cabin burning in the background
- Features many black and white sequences intermingled… doc footage of the war as well
- The wind is constantly moving objects
- There’s a definite surreal or Dali influence
- Dream sequences featuring slow motion of woman (mother/lover) washing hair
- Mother obsession for Tarkovsky—Freud or Oedipus
- Duel roles- Bunuel influence… Bergman
- Water sound dripping constantly
- There’s also a sequence of flicking through a book and looking at the pages for a few minutes
- A very personal stream of consciousness film
- Some brilliant citizen kane-like staging and foreground/background shots- one of her picking potatoes off the ground with rain coming off the roof in the back
- Mirror has many possible meanings- dual roles for actors/characters, past vs present, reality vs. dreams
- Not as many as Stalker but there are many very nice tracking shots
- You can see the influences (moving grass with wind- black and white sequences in both Malick and Bela Tarr
- Top 5 quality of 1975
- Must-See
Drake2021-05-31T15:14:03-04:00
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
The first 35 minutes or so are by far the film’s highest cinematic point, yes ? I’m kind of in the same spot as you in the disconnect with the consensus.
Every time I rewatch it, I spend the first 35 minutes thinking “yes, this is it, now it clicks” only to be underwhelmed following those 30 minutes outside of a few instances.
OTOH Stalker is consistently strong from start to finish, and my appreciation only grows with each rewatch.
@Vaanilla- Really good share here- thank you!